References
Aberdein, A., & Dove, I. J. (Eds.). (2013). The argument of mathematics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Cabassut, R., Conner, A., İşçimen, F. I., Furinghetti, F., Jahnke, H. N., & Morselli, F. (2012). Conceptions of proof–In research and teaching. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 169–190). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Gueudet, G., Bosch, M., Disessa, A., Kwon, O. N., & Verschaffel, L. (2016). Transitions in mathematics education. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31622-2.
Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 389–399.
Hersh, R. (1995). Fresh breezes in the philosophy of mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 102(7), 589–594.
Hersh, R. (Ed.). (2006). 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
Kelton, M. L., & Ma, J. Y. (2018). Reconfiguring mathematical settings and activity through multi-party, whole-body collaboration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(2), 177–196.
Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation-based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom. ZDM, 47(7), 1107–1120.
Mariotti, M. A. (2000). Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–2), 25–53.
Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41–51.
Mithalal, J., & Balacheff, N. (2019). The instrumental deconstruction as a link between drawing and geometrical figure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(2), 161–176.
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., Kalavasis, F., & Meimaris, M. (2019). “My relationship with mathematics”: Multimodal realisations and realities. In A. Moutsios-Rentzos, A. Giannakoulopoulos, & M. Meimaris (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Digital Storytelling Conference “Current Trends in Digital Storytelling: Research & Practices” (pp. 186–194). Club UNESCO Zakynthos: Zakynthos.
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., Kritikos, G., & Kalavasis, F. (2019). Co-constructing teaching and learning spaces in and between mathematics and physics at school. Proceedings of CIEAEM 70. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica, 2(3), 215–220.
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., & Micha, I. (2018). Proof and proving in high school geometry: A teaching experiment based on Toulmin’s scheme. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 395–402). Umeå, Sweden: PME.
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., Shiakalli, M. A., & Zacharos, K. (2019). Supporting mathematical argumentation of pre-school children. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 6(1), 216–224.
Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 45–65.
Recio, A. M., & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 83–99.
Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 289–321.
Stylianides, G. J, Buchbinder, O., Cramer, J., Durand-Guerrier, V., Moutsios-Rentzos, A., & Valenta, A. (2019). Introduction to Thematic Working Group 1: Argumentation and proof. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397987
Thurston, W. P. (1995). On proof and progress in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 29–37.
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35.
Zack, V. (1997). “You have to prove us wrong”: Proof at the elementary school level. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 291–298). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moutsios-Rentzos, A. Book Review: Andreas J. Stylianides (2016) Proving in the elementary mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math 103, 375–381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09936-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09936-5