Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Tending to the midpoint”: an intuitive rule in mathematical thinking

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study introduces an effective intuitive rule focusing on “tending to the midpoint” in individuals’ mathematical thinking. The rule concerns the intuitive tendency towards choosing the midpoint of a change, as a salient point among all the points. To test the proposed rule, 120 students in grade 9 were interviewed. We analyzed the data using premises from the dual-process theory. Our findings revealed that “tending to the midpoint” is conceivable as an intuitive rule in individuals’ mathematical thinking, and that the answers given to the relevant questions were much affected by the rule consisting of a salient variable as midpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babai, R., Brecher, T., Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2006). Intuitive interference in probabilistic reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babai, R., Levyadun, T., Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2006). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: A reaction time study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(8), 913–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babai, R., Nattiv, L., & Stavy, R. (2016). Comparison of perimeters: Improving students’ performance by increasing the salience of the relevant variable. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48, 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagni, G.T. (2007). Didactics and history of numerical series, 100 years after Ernesto Cesaro’s death (1906): Guido Grandi, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz and Jacobo Riccati. Retrieved from http://www.syllogismos.it/history/GrandiJointMeeting.pdf.

  • Barahmand, A. (2017). The boundary between finite and infinite states through the concept of limits of sequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zeev, T. (1998). Rational errors and the mathematical mind. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borodin, A. (2016). The need for an application of dual-process theory to mathematics education. CORERJ: Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research e-Journal, 3, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D., & Melamed, U. (1981). Is it possible to measure the intuitive acceptance of mathematical statements? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In T. Frangsmyr (Ed.), Les prix Nobel: The Nobel prizes 2002 (pp. 449–489). Stockholm, Sweden: The Nobel Foundation.

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2009). Intuitive vs analytical thinking: Four perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn, C., & Stephens, M. (2007). Whole number knowledge and number lines help develop fraction concepts. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), Hobart (Vol. 2, pp. 601–610) Sydney, Australia: MERGA.

  • Stavy, R., & Babai, R. (2010). Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: Insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., Goel, V., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. (2006). Intuitive interference in quantitative reasoning. Brain Research, 1073-1074(1), 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (1996). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: The case of ‘more of A -- more of B’. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 653–667.

  • Tirosh, D., & Stavy, R. (1996). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: The case of ‘Everything can be divided by two’. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 669–683.

  • Tirosh, D., & Stavy, R. (1999). Intuitive rules: A way to explain and predict students’ reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Aboulafia, M. (1998). Is it possible to confine the application of the intuitive rule: ‘Subdivision processes can always be repeated’? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(6), 813–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Cohen, S. (1998). Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1257–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P. (2002). The intuitive rule ‘same A-same B’: The case of triangles and quadrilaterals. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 24(4), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Ronen, I. (2001). Intuitive rules: A theory and its implications to mathematics and science teacher education. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, M. Komorek, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education – past, present, and future (pp. 167–175). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Educated adults are still affected by intuitions about the effect of arithmetical operations: Evidence from a reaction- time study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Weyers, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). The predictive power of intuitive rules: A critical analysis of the impact of ‘more A–more B’ and ‘same A–same B’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R. (1999). Intuitive rules in number theory: Example of ‘the more of A, the more of B’ rule implementation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

    Ali Barahmand

Authors
  1. Ali Barahmand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Barahmand.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barahmand, A. “Tending to the midpoint”: an intuitive rule in mathematical thinking. Educ Stud Math 102, 221–238 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09909-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09909-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation