Abstract
A broad categorisation of different reading styles for mathematics text is generated in this research. The styles derive from those found in literature around academic reading skills. These styles are inductively refined using video transcripts of five specially chosen students studying out loud from a prescribed mathematics textbook. The context is a self-study mathematics course directed at high school mathematics teachers with weak content knowledge. Reading is understood as a transaction (enacted curriculum) between text (written curriculum) and reader. Reading styles are characterised in terms of depth of reading, focus on different components of text or not, connections within text or to prior knowledge, and performance on exercises. Five different styles of reading mathematics text are identified: close reading with strong connections, close reading with some connections, scanning, skimming, and avoiding. The different reading styles are also interpreted in terms of structure, voice, and genre of the textbook.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2011). Modelling teaching in mathematics teacher education and the constitution of mathematics for teaching. In K. Ruthven & T. Rowland (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 139–160). Dordrecht: Springer.
BBC. (2011). Skillswise: English and maths for adults. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/skillswise/factsheet/en05skim-e3-f-skimming-and-scanning. Accessed 6 Jan 2017.
BBC & British Council. (2008). Intensive reading. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/intensive-reading. Accessed 6 Jan 2017.
Berger, M. (2016). Reading and learning from mathematics textbooks: An analytic framework. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitanyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 83–90). Szeged: PME.
Berger, M. (2017). Reading mathematics text: A study of two empirical readings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9867-6
Bruner, J. S. (1985). The role of interaction formats in language acquisition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 31–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Gerofsky, S. (1999). Genre analysis as a way of understanding pedagogy in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 36–46.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
Kilpatrick, J. (2014). From clay tablets to computer tablet: The evolution of school mathematics textbooks. International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) 29–31 July 2014, University of Southampton, UK.
Lithner, J. (2003). Students’ mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 29–55.
Massey University. (2012). The online writing and learning link. Reading styles. Retrieved from owll.massey.ac.nz/study-skills/reading-styles.php. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2016). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. USA: Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 28 May 2017.
Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 325–346.
Österholm, M. (2008). Do students need to learn how to use their mathematics textbooks? The case of reading comprehension. NOMAD -Nordisk Matematikkdidakticc, 13(3), 53–73.
Österholm, M., & Bergqvist, E. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 751–763.
Remillard, J. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to “lived” resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rezat, S. (2006). The structures of German mathematics textbooks. ZDM, 38(6), 482–487.
Rezat, S. (2008). Learning mathematics with textbooks. In O. Figueras, L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 4, pp. 177–184). Morelia: PME.
Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: Students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbook related to self-regulated practices. ZDM, 45, 659–670.
Rezat, S., & Straesser, R. (2014). Mathematics textbooks and how they are used. In P. Andrews & T. Rowland (Eds.), MasterClass in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 51–62). London & New York: Bloomsbury.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepherd, M. D., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University students’ reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256.
Sierpinska, A. (1997). Formats of interaction and model readers. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(2), 3–12.
Sullivan, M. (2012). Precalculus (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 49–63.
Funding
This work is based on research supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa: UID Number 85685.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berger, M. Different reading styles for mathematics text. Educ Stud Math 100, 139–159 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9871-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9871-y