Abstract
Educators and several national standards highlight the role that problem solving should play in students’ mathematics education: problem solving is recognized as one of the most significant activities of doing mathematics. From the research point of view, nowadays, it is well established that cognitive and affective factors come into play in problem solving activities, but some affective issues remain unexplored. In particular, we want to study pupils’ attitudes towards (mathematical) problems, analyzing their evolution from kindergarten (where the word ‘mathematics’ is rarely explicitly mentioned) to primary school. In a well-defined affective theoretical framework, where attitude is a three-dimensional construct including beliefs and emotions, we carried out a qualitative and narrative study involving 284 students of seven different Italian schools: 121 from kindergarten and grade 1 and 163 from grade 3 to 5. Analyzing the qualitative data collected, we described primary students’ attitudes towards problems and we compared these with those developed in kindergarten, where the word ‘mathematics’ is not explicitly mentioned.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardelle, C., & Di Martino, P. (2012). E-learning in secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics: For what purpose? ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 787–800.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2003). Role of the amygdala in decision-making. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 985, 356–369.
Caplan, J. B., & Caplan, P. J. (2005). The perseverative search for sex differences in mathematics abilities. In A. Gallagher & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 25–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, P. (1985). Two children's anticipations, beliefs, and motivations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(2), 111–126.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, R. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Demazière, D., & Dubar, C. (1997). Analyser les entretiens biographiques. Paris: Éditions Nathan.
Di Martino, P., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017). Beyond performance results: Analyzing the informational and developmental potentials of standardized mathematics test. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(3), 6–11.
Di Martino, P., & Gregorio, F. (2018). The mathematical crisis in secondary–tertiary transition. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9894-y
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(4), 471–483.
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gerofsky, S. (1996). A linguistic and narrative view of word problems in mathematics education. For The Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 36–45.
Goldin, G. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219.
Goldin, G. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 293–307.
Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (2002). “The answer is really 4.5”: Beliefs about word problems. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 271–292). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover Publications.
Halmos, P. (1980). The heart of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519–524.
Hannula, M. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25–46.
Hannula, M. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137–161.
Hannula, M. (2015). Emotions in problem solving. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 269–288). New York: Springer.
Hannula, M., Pantziara, M., & Di Martino, P. (2018). Affect and mathematical thinking: Exploring developments, trends, and future directions. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education—Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 128–141). London: Routledge Falmer.
Jakobsen, A., & Ribeiro, M. (2013). Teachers’ reflections on non-standard students work. In M. Ogunniyi, O. Amosun, K. Langenhoven, S. Kwofie, & S. Dinie (Eds.), Proceeding of the 21st annual meeting of the southern African association for research in mathematics (pp. 44–54). Cape Town: University of the Westen Cape.
Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (1997). The world according to Johnny: A coping perspective in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 265–292.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Liljedahl, P. (2008). The AHA! experience. Mathematical contexts, pedagogical implications. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
Liljedahl, P. (2016). Flow: A framework for discussing teaching. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the IGPME (Vol. 3, pp. 203–210). Szeged: PME.
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. ICME-13 topical surveys. New York: Springer.
Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton.
McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575–596). New York: MacMillan.
McLeod, D., & Adams, V. (Eds.). (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York: Springer.
Mellone, M., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). The effect of rewording and dyadic interaction on realistic reasoning in solving word problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 1–12.
Mershet, K. (1993). How old is the shepherd? An essay about mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 548–554.
NCTM – National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Perkins, D. (2000). Archimedes’ bathtub: The art of breakthrough thinking. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte: Information Age.
Poincaré, H. (1952). Science and method. New York: Dover Publications Inc..
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.
Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J., & Jäder, J. (2015). Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 533–552.
Sowder, L. (1988). Children’s solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227–238.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Zan, R. (2011). The crucial role of narrative thought in understanding story problems. In K. Kislenko (Ed.), Current state of research on mathematical beliefs (Vol. XVI, pp. 287–305). Tallin: Tallin University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Martino, P. Pupils’ view of problems: the evolution from kindergarten to the end of primary school. Educ Stud Math 100, 291–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9850-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9850-3