Abstract
The paper focuses on four upper secondary students’ collaborative small-group mathematical reasoning (MR) with respect to a sinusoidal function. The students were collaboratively engaged in a process of MR regarding the relationships between mathematical theoretical descriptions of parameters in the algebraic expression of the sinusoidal function and their counterparts when identifying these parameters together with their numerical value in a problem situation. Students’ reasoning on the mathematical tool of this sinusoidal function is manifold and multicoloured. Adopting a dialogical approach to the analyses of student interaction, the study reveals that the students’ MR, viewed as comprising both process aspects and structural aspects, is characterised by three features. Firstly, the analyses show that the students’ MR is characterised by tensions between the mathematical tool and its use in situ, called resistance. Secondly, the students’ MR is characterised by their use of semiotic means of objectification such as deictics, gestures, linguistic devices and the text book. Thirdly, the analyses reveal that MR is characterised by the students’ efforts to interthink and collaborate in order to achieve the goal of their collective task solving. All four students contributed to the collective MR, however, in various ways and to a varying degree.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Transcription codes = continued utterances, (( )) Non-verbal activity/comments, ( ) inaudible fragments, Under emphasised words, CAPS loud utterance, . Prolonged sound
In the used mathematics text book, the correct answers to the tasks are presented at the end.
References
Andresen, M. (2015). Students’ strategies for modelling a Ferris wheel. In H. Silfverberg, T. Kärki, & M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education – proceedings of NORMA14, Turku, June 3–6, 2014. Studies in Subject didactics 10 (pp. 247–256). The Finnish Research Association for Subject Didactics.
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Erstad, G., Heir, O., Bjørnsgård, I., Borgan, Ø., Pålsgård, J., & Skrede, P. A. (2002). Matematikk 3MX [Mathematics 3MX]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels. Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. In Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in task solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Markovà, I. (1990). Introduction. In I. Markovà & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 102–138.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017691.13428.b9
Niss, M. (2004). Key issues and trends in research on mathematical education. In H. Fujita, Y. Hashimoto, B. R. Hodgson, P. Y. Lee, S. Lerman, & T. Sawada (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress on mathematical education (pp. 37–57). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer.
Parnafes, O. (2007). What does “fast” mean? Understanding the physical world through computational representations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 415–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413443
Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.
Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Río, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 455–486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
Weber, K. (2005). Students’ understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217423
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlsen, M. Upper secondary students’ mathematical reasoning on a sinusoidal function. Educ Stud Math 99, 277–291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9844-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9844-1