Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reconceptualizing Working Memory in Educational Research

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, research from cognitive science has provided a solid theoretical framework to develop evidence-based interventions in education. In particular, research into reading, writing, language, mathematics and multimedia learning has been guided by the application of Baddeley’s multicomponent model of working memory. However, an over-reliance on this single perspective has overlooked the theoretical diversity of contemporary research into working memory. We review the successes and shortcomings of applying Baddeley’s model in accounting for a range of evidence and draw attention to alternative models that have been largely ignored within educational research. Specifically, we evaluate frameworks of working memory provided by Kane, Engle and colleagues (attentional control model) and Cowan (embedded process model). We conclude that these alternative views can support a reconceptualization of the contributions of working memory to academic learning that may not be afforded by interpretations of the prevailing multicomponent model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007). Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: a general or specific deficit? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 197–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford Psychology Series #11. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: theory and practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), R136–R140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. A. (2002). Prose recall and amnesia: implications for the structure of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1737–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Vallar, G., & Wilson, B. A. (1987). Sentence comprehension and phonological memory: some neuropsychological evidence. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: the psychology of reading (pp. 509–529). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2011). Developmental change in working memory strategies: from passive maintenance to active refreshing. Developmental Psychology, 47, 898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chein, J. M., Ravizza, S. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2003). Using neuroimaging to evaluate models of working memory and their implications for language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(4), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (1996). Profiles of reading comprehension difficulties: an analysis of single cases. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and intervention (pp. 113–136). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-process model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? In Sossin, W. S., Lacaille, J. C., Castellucci, V. F., & Belleville, S. (Eds.), Progress in brain research, Vol 169. Elsevier.

  • Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four how is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Rouder, J. N., Blume, C. L., & Saults, J. S. (2012). Models of verbal working memory capacity: what does it take to make them work? Psychological Review, 119, 480–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., Shankweiler, D., Macaruso, P., & Barshalom, E. (1990). Working memory and comprehension of spoken sentences: investigations of children with reading disorders. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 477–508). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill reexamined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII: the psychology of reading (pp. 491–508). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, J. P., & Janzen, C. (2004). Learning math: basic concepts, math difficulties, and suggestions for intervention. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 32(2), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: assessment an intervention. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Uber das Gedachtnis. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 972–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999a). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–132). Cambridge University Press.

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999b). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: a latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, V., Barrouillet, P., Jarrold, C., & Camos, V. (2011). Developmental differences in working memory: where do they come from? Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2004). Working memory and classroom learning. Dyslexia Review, 15, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: a study of young children learning arbitrary names of toys. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 8, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, G. J., Towse, J. N., & Hutton, U. (2001). What limits children’s working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbo, I., Vandierendonck, A., & De Rammelaere, S. (2007). The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: number and value of the carry. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 708–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbo, I., Vandierendonck, A., & Vergauwe, E. (2008). The role of working memory in carrying and borrowing. Psychological Research, 71, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 403–404). New York: Henry Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahana, M. J., Sederberg, P. B., & Howard, M. W. (2008). Putting short-term memory into context: reply to Usher, Davelaar, Haarmann, and Goshen-Gottstein (2008). Psychological Review, 115, 1119–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 336–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 637–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatekin, C. (2004). A test of the integrity of the components of Baddeley’s model of working memory in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Child Psychological and Psychiatry, 45, 912–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (1999). Components of working memory in text production. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing (pp. 143–161). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kercood, S., & Grskovic, J. A. (2009). The effects of highlighting on the math computation performance and off-task behavior of students with attention problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman’s g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: their nature and measurement (pp. 49–76). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, C. M., & Marek, P. (1999). Testing components of Kellogg’s multicomponent model of working memory in writing: the role of the phonological loop. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing (pp. 25–41). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J., & Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, D. L., Evans, A. D., Jeffrey, T. R., Palmer, K. R., Wikstrom, C. S., & Doolittle, P. E. (2009). Multimedia learning and individual differences: mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 636–651. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00848.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multi-media learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory impairments in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, M., Desert, M., Auburn, A., & Seron, X. (2001). Involvement of short-term memory in complex mental calculation. Memory and Cognition, 29, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Modeling working memory: a computational implementation of the time-based resource-sharing theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 10–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Sub, H. M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity—facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olive, T. (2004). Working memory in writing: empirical evidence from the dual-task technique. European Psychologist, 9, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem-solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, B. P. (1993). Arithematic disabilities, specific and otherwise: a neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, J., & Rummer, R. (2014). Attention, working memory, and long-term memory in multimedia learning: an integrated perspective based on process models of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 1–22.

  • Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and continguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(1), 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (2000). Are working memory deficits in readers with learning disabilities hard to change? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. (1994). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 7, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Saez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 252–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.

  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronsky, L. N. (2005). Strategy use, the development of automaticity, and working memory involvement in complex multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 33, 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M., Davelaar, E. J., Haarmann, H. J., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2008). Short-term memory after all: comment on Sederberg, Howard, and Kahana (2008). Psychological Review, 115, 1108–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderberg, R., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20(7), 721–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Was, C. A., & Woltz, D. J. (2007). Reexamining the relationship between working memory and comprehension: the role of available long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4), 761–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Boada, R., Ogline, J. S., Tunick, R. A., Chhabildas, N. A., & Olson, R. K. (2001). A comparison of the cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada

    Barbara Fenesi, Faria Sana, Joseph A. Kim & David I. Shore

Authors
  1. Barbara Fenesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faria Sana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph A. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David I. Shore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Fenesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fenesi, B., Sana, F., Kim, J.A. et al. Reconceptualizing Working Memory in Educational Research. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 333–351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9286-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9286-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation