Abstract
In egg contaminant studies, it is necessary to calculate egg contaminant concentrations on a fresh wet weight basis and this requires accurate estimates of egg density and egg volume. We show that the inclusion or exclusion of the eggshell can influence egg contaminant concentrations, and we provide estimates of egg density (both with and without the eggshell) and egg-shape coefficients (used to estimate egg volume from egg morphometrics) for American avocet (Recurvirostra americana), black-necked stilt (Himantopus mexicanus), and Forster’s tern (Sterna forsteri). Egg densities (g/cm3) estimated for whole eggs (1.056 ± 0.003) were higher than egg densities estimated for egg contents (1.024 ± 0.001), and were 1.059 ± 0.001 and 1.025 ± 0.001 for avocets, 1.056 ± 0.001 and 1.023 ± 0.001 for stilts, and 1.053 ± 0.002 and 1.025 ± 0.002 for terns. The egg-shape coefficients for egg volume (K v ) and egg mass (K w ) also differed depending on whether the eggshell was included (K v = 0.491 ± 0.001; K w = 0.518 ± 0.001) or excluded (K v = 0.493 ± 0.001; K w = 0.505 ± 0.001), and varied among species. Although egg contaminant concentrations are rarely meant to include the eggshell, we show that the typical inclusion of the eggshell in egg density and egg volume estimates results in egg contaminant concentrations being underestimated by 6–13 %. Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of the eggshell significantly influences estimates of egg density, egg volume, and fresh egg mass, which leads to egg contaminant concentrations that are biased low. We suggest that egg contaminant concentrations be calculated on a fresh wet weight basis using only internal egg-content densities, volumes, and masses appropriate for the species. For the three waterbirds in our study, these corrected coefficients are 1.024 ± 0.001 for egg density, 0.493 ± 0.001 for K v , and 0.505 ± 0.001 for K w .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA (2010) Accuracy of egg flotation throughout incubation to determine embryo age and incubation day in waterbird nests. Condor 112:438–446. doi:10.1525/cond.2010.090070
Ackerman JT, Herzog MP, Schwarzbach SE (2013) Methylmercury is the predominant form of mercury in bird eggs: a synthesis. Environ Sci Technol 47:2052–2060
Ainley DG, Nettleship DN, Carter HR, Storey AE (2002) Common Murre (Uria aalge). Birds North Am Online. doi:10.2173/bna.666
Brown WY (1976) Egg specific gravity and incubation in the Sooty Tern and Brown Noddy. Auk 93:371–374
Drent R (1970) Functional aspects of incubation in the Herring Gull. Behav Suppl 1–132
Hartman CA, Ackerman JT, Herring G et al (2013) Marsh wrens as bioindicators of mercury in wetlands of Great Salt Lake: do blood and feathers reflect site-specific exposure risk to bird reproduction? Environ Sci Technol 47:6597–6605. doi:10.1021/es400910x
Henny CJ, Anderson TW, Crayon JJ (2008) Organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, metals, and trace elements in waterbird eggs, Salton Sea, California, 2004. Hydrobiologia 604:137–149. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8806-3_11
Hoyt DF (1979) Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk 73–77
Manning T (1979) Density and volume corrections of eggs of seven passerine birds. Auk 96:207–211
Maurer G, Russell DGD, Cassey P (2010) Interpreting the Lists and Equations of Egg Dimensions in Schönwetter’s Handbuch Der Oologie. Auk 127:940–947. doi:10.1525/auk.2010.09260
Maurer G, Portugal SJ, Cassey P (2012) A comparison of indices and measured values of eggshell thickness of different shell regions using museum eggs of 230 European bird species. Ibis (Lond 1859) 154(4):714–724
Paganelli CV, Olszowka A, Ar A (1974) The avian egg: surface area, volume, and density. Condor 76(3):319–325
Pearl R, Surface F (1914) A biometrical study of egg production in the domestic fowl: III. Variation and correlation in the physical characters of the egg. Bur Anim Ind Bull 110:171–241
Pyle P, Sydeman WJ, Mclaren E, Sydeman W (1999) Organochlorine concentrations, eggshell thickness, and hatchability in seabirds off Central California. Waterbirds 22:376–381
Rahn H, Paganelli CV (1989) The initial density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schönwetter. J Ornithol 130:207–215
Rahn H, Parisi P, Paganelli CV (1982) Estimating the initial density of birds’ eggs. Condor 84:339–341
Roberts CA (1997) Organochlorine Contaminants in Eggs of Tern Species and the Western Snowy Plover Nesting in San Diego Bay. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Romanoff A (1932) Fat metabolism of the chick embryo under standard conditions of artificial incubation. Biol Bull 62:54–62
Schönwetter M (1960–1992) Handbuch der Oologie. Akademie Verlag, Berlin
Stickel L, Wiemeyer S, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustment for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–196
Westerskov K (1950) Methods for determining the age of game bird eggs. J Wildl Manag 14:56–67. doi:10.2307/3795978
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center and the CALFED Bay-Delta Program’s Ecosystem Restoration Program. We thank Sarah Stoner-Duncan and Brittany Wensky for assistance in the field and lab, and Julie Yee for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The use of trade, product, or firm names in the publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest related to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herzog, M.P., Ackerman, J.T., Eagles-Smith, C.A. et al. It’s what’s inside that counts: egg contaminant concentrations are influenced by estimates of egg density, egg volume, and fresh egg mass. Ecotoxicology 25, 770–776 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1635-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1635-9