Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in ecological impacts of systemic insecticides with different physicochemical properties on biocenosis of experimental paddy fields

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental risks of pesticides are typically determined by laboratory single-species tests based on OECD test guidelines, even if biodiversity should also be taken into consideration. To evaluate how realistic these assessments are, ecological changes caused by the systemic insecticides imidacloprid and fipronil, which have different physicochemical properties, when applied at recommended commercial rates on rice fields were monitored using experimental paddy mesocosms. A total of 178 species were observed. There were no significant differences in abundance of crop arthropods among the experimental paddies. However, zooplankton, benthic and neuston communities in imidacloprid-treated field had significantly less abundance of species than control and fipronil fields. Significant differences in abundance of nekton community were also found between both insecticide-treated paddies and control. Influences on the growth of medaka fish were also found in both adults and their fries. Both Principal Response Curve analysis (PRC) and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) showed the time series variations in community structure among treatments, in particular for imidacloprid during the middle stage of the experimental period. These results show the ecological effect-concentrations (LOEC ~ 1 μg/l) of these insecticides in mesocosms, especially imidacloprid, are clearly different from their laboratory tests. We suggest that differences in the duration of the recovery process among groups of species are due to different physicochemical properties of the insecticides. Therefore, realistic prediction and assessment of pesticide effects at the community level should consider not only the sensitivity traits and interaction among species but also the differences in physicochemical characteristics of each pesticide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bambaradeniya CNB, Edirisinghe JP, Silva DND, Gunatilleke CVS, Ranawana KB, Wijekoon S (2004) Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Biodivers Conserv 13:1715–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran S, Kookana RS, Naidu R (1997) Determination of the insecticide imidacloprid in water and soil using high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatography 787:271–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beketov MA, Liess M (2005) Acute contamination with esfenvalerate and food limitation: chronic effect on the mayfly Cloeon dipterum. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1281–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beketov MA, Liess M (2006) The influence of predation on the chronic response of Artemia sp. populations to a toxicant. J Appl Ecol 24:1281–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Beketov MA, Liess M (2008) Acute and delayed effects of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid on seven freshwater arthropods. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:461–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beketov MA, Schäfer RB, Marwitz A, Paschke A, Liess M (2008) Long-term stream invertebrate community alterations induced by the insecticide thiacloprid: effect concentrations and recovery dynamics. Sci Total Environ 405:96–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesten JJTI, Köpp H, Adriaanse PI, Brock TCM, Forbes VE (2007) Conceptual model for improving the link between exposure and effects in the aquatic risk assessment of pesticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 66:291–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell PJ, Arnold DJS, Brock TCM, Grandy NJ, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund SJ, Streloke M (1999) Guidance document on higher tier aquatic risk assessment for pesticide (HARAP). SETAC Press, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Caquet T, Hanson ML, Roucaute M, Graham DW, Lagadic L (2007) Influence of isolation on the recovery of pond mesocosms from the application of an insecticide. II Benthic macroinvertebrate responses. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1280–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE, Schoenly K, Heong KL, Justo H, Arida G, Barrion AT, Litsinger JA (1994) A food web approach to evaluating the effect of insecticide spraying on insect pest population dynamics in a Philippine irrigated rice ecosystem. J Appl Ecol 31:747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diveristy (CBD) Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. (http://www.cbd.int/sp/)

  • Graney RL, Kennedy JH, Rodgers JH (1994) Aquatic mesocosm studies in ecological risk assessment. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekara AS, Truong T, Goh KS, Spurlock F, Tjeerdema RS (2007) Environmental fate and toxicology of fipronil. J Pestic Sci 32:189–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose GC, van den Brink PJ (2004) Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:511–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino T, Takase I (1993) New insecticide imidacloprid-safety assessment. Noyaku Kenkyu 39:37–45 [in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Plant Protection Association (JPPA) (2005) Pesticide handbook. Japan Plant Protection Association, Tokyo [in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinguji H, Ueda T, Goka K, Hidaka K, Matsura T (2009) Effects of imidacloprid and fipronil insecticide application on the larvae and adults of Sympetrum frequens (Libellulidae: Odonata). Trans Jap Soc Irrigat Drain Reclamat Eng 259:35–41 [in Japanese with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall RD, Akerman J (1992) Terrestrial wildlife exposed to agrochemicals: an ecological risk assessment perspective. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:1727–1749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman W, Segawa R (1995) Interim report of the pesticide chemistry database 1995. Environmental Hazards Assessment Program. EH95-04. State of California, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch

  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Liess M (2002) Population response to toxicants is altered by intraspecific interaction. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:138–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liess M, Beketov M (2011) Traits and stress: keys to identify community effects of low levels of toxicants in test systems. Ecotoxicology 20:1328–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liess M, von der Ohe PC (2005) Analyzing effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities in stream. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:954–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Mancisidor P, Carbonell G, Fernàndez C, Tarazona JV (2008) Ecological impact of repeated applications of chlorpyrifos on zooplankton community in mesocosms under Mediterranean conditions. Ecotoxicology 17:811–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masutti CSM, Mermut AR (2007) Degradation of fipronil under laboratory conditions in a tropical soil from Sirinhaém Pernambuco, Brazil. J Environ Sci Health B 42:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mesléard F, Garnero S, Beck N, Rosecchi E (2005) Uselessness and indirect negative effects of an insecticide on rice field invertebrates. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328:955–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2005) 2005th annual statistics on pests and pesticides. Japan Plant Protection Association, Tokyo [in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2009) FY 2009 Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo (http://www.maff.go.jp/e/annual_report/2009/index.html)

  • Nemeth-Konda L, Fűleky Gy, Morovjan Gy, Csokan P (2002) Sorption behavior of aetochlor, atrazine, carbendazim, diazinon, imidacloprid, and isoproturon on Hungarian agricultural soil. Chemosphere 48:545–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004) Daphnia sp., acute immobilization test, vol 202. OECD, Paris

  • Oyama J, Kidokoro T, Ono T (2005) Effects of pesticide on natural enemies in paddy field. Bull Miyagi Pref Furukawa Agric Exp Stat 5:31–42 [in Japanese with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters BJ, Paschke A, Reynaldi S, Kraak MHS, Admiraal W, Liess M (2005) Influence of food limitation on the effects of Fenvalerate pulse exposure on the life history and population growth rate of Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2254–2259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP (2001) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert KH, Giddings JM, Judd L (2002) Effects analysis of time-varying or repeated exposures in aquatic ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1977–1992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Goka K (2006a) Ecological effects of the insecticide imidacloprid and a pollutant from antidandruff shampoo in experimental rice fields. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1677–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Goka K (2006b) Influence of light in acute toxicity bioassays of imidacloprid and zinc pyrithione to zooplankton crustaceans. Aquat Toxicol 78:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Yamashita H, Osaka R, Yoneda M, Goka K (2007) Ecological effects of imidacloprid on arthropod communities in and around a vegetable crop. J Environ Sci Health B 42:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer RB, Caquet T, Siimes K, Mueller R, Lagadic L, Liess M (2007) Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural headwater streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe. Sci Total Environ 382:272–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer RB, van den Brink PJ, Liess M (2011) Impacts of pesticides on freshwater ecosysytem. In Sánchez-Bayo F, van den Brink PJ, Mann R (eds) Ecological impact of toxic chemicals. Bentham Science Publishers, pp 261–278

  • Shan Z, Wang L, Cai D, Gong R, Zhu Z, Yu F (2003) Impact of fipronil on crustacean aquatic organisms in a paddy field-fishpond ecosystem. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 70:746–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song MY, Stark JD, Brown JJ (1997) Comparative toxicity of four insecticides, including imidacloprid and tebufenozine, to four aquatic arthropods. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:2494–2500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takamura K, Yasuno M (1986) Effects of pesticide application on chironomid larvae and ostracods in rice fields. Appl Entomol Zool 21:370–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes HA (2010) The significance of the Druckrey-Küpfmüller equation for risk assessment—the toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides to arthropods is reinforced by exposure time. Toxicology 276:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin CDS (2001–2002) The e-Pesticide Manual. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey

  • Tourenq C, Bennetts RE, Kowalski H, Vialet E, Lucchesi J-L, Kayser Y, Isenmann P (2001) Are ricefields a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camargue, southern France? Biol Conserv 100:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traas TP, Janse JH, van den Brink PJ, Brock TCM, Aldenberg T (2004) A freshwater food web model for the combined effects of nutrients and insecticide stress and subsequent recovery. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:521–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink PJ, ter Braak CJF (1999) Principal response curve: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Straalen NM (2002) Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 11:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wijngaarden RPA, Brock TCM, van den Brink PJ (2005) Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review. Ecotoxicology 14:355–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby A, Lan LP, Heong KL, Huyen NPD, Quang NH, Minh NV, Thomas MB (2006) Arthropod diversity and community structure in relation to land use in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Ecosystems 9:538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying G-G, Kookana RS (2001) Sorption of fipronil and its metabolites on soils from South Australia. Environmental fate and toxicology of fipronil. J Environ Sci Health B 36:545–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analyses. Prentice-Hall International, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Masako Ikejima for helping with fieldwork. Our special thanks to Yoshio Suzuki, Chizuko Yoshida and Akira Kawada (staffs of the Kawakami F.C.) for preparing the paddies transplanting the rice seedlings and looking after the paddy during the experiment. The authors wish to thank Dr. Takehiko Hayashi, Dr. Hiroyuki Mano and Dr. Takashi Nagai for valuable technical advices. The paper benefited from the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Hayasaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayasaka, D., Korenaga, T., Sánchez-Bayo, F. et al. Differences in ecological impacts of systemic insecticides with different physicochemical properties on biocenosis of experimental paddy fields. Ecotoxicology 21, 191–201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0778-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0778-y

Keywords

Navigation