Abstract
This research investigated the effectiveness of an assistive technology tool, the Livescribe Pen (LSP), with an elementary student identified with dyslexia. Using interview and focus group methodologies over the span of one academic year, the study probed the perceptions of teachers, parent, and child. While the LSP was primarily utilized for curriculum accessibility and an audio tool to promote academic independence, the study’s findings reveal its impact as an assistive technology on both academic success for children with disabilities as well as non-academic gains. These included an increase in independence, more time for social activities, and the ability to develop strategies for homework success. Most importantly, the academic team and the parent reported a sense of higher aspirations for this student; ones they had not thought possible previously. Finally, the study revealed two elements critically important for students with disabilities. Those are the importance of fostering communities of support and the importance of self-determination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abadiano, R., & Turner, J. (2003). Home-school partnership: what works? The Nera Journal, 39(3), 58–62.
Baker, L. (2003). The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(1), 87–106. doi:10.1080/10573560308207.
Brante, E. (2013). ‘I don’t know what it is to be able to read’: how students with dyslexia experience their reading impairment. Support for Learning, 28(2), 79–86.
Brooking, K. (2007). Home-school Partnerships. What are they really? Teaching and Learning, 14–17.
Christenson, S. L., Rounds, T., & Franklin, M. J. (1992). Home-school collaboration: effects, issues, and opportunities. In S. L. Christenson & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Home-school collaboration: enhancing children’s academic and social competence (pp. 193–214). Washington, D.C.: National Association of School Psychologists.
Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: facts, trends and emerging issues (p. 2014). New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
Cosden, M., Elliott, K., & Noble, S. (1999). Self-understanding and self-esteem in children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(4), 279–290.
Cox, D. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions using home-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(4), 473–497.
Crozier, G., & Reay, D. (Eds.) (2005). Activating participation: parents and teachers working towards partnership. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Eide, F. (February 24, 2016). Too much homework for students with dyslexia. Retrieved from http://dyslexicadvantage.org/too-much-homework-for-dyslexic-students/
Epstein, J., & Sheldon, M. (2006). Prospects for change: preparing educators for school, family and community partnerships. Peabody Journal for Education, 81(2), 81–120.
Frankenberger, C. (2016). Technology: livescribe pen. In The Yale Center for Dyslexia & creativity .Retrieved from http://dyslexia.yale.edu/TECH_livescribe.html
Kennedy, M., & Deshler, D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 289–298.
Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: a phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 171–196.
Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480–500.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Livescribe.com (2016). Livescribe 3 Smartpen. Retrieved from: https://www.livescribe.com/blog/noteworthy2/wpcontent/uploads/2014/03/Livescribe3StandardPenSideview.jpg
Maor, D., Currie, J., & Drewry, R. (2011). The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: a review of research-based studies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3), 283–298.
McConaughey, S., Kay, P. J., & Fitzgerald, M. (1999). The achieving, behaving, caring project for preventing ED: two year outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7(4), 224–239.
Morrow, L. (1995). Family literacy: connections in schools and communities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Morrow, L., & Young, J. (1997). A family literacy program connecting school and home: effects on attitude, motivation and literacy achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 736–742.
Patton, J. R., Jayanthi, M., & Polloway, E. A. (2001). Home-school collaboration about homework: what do we know and what should we do? Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 17(3), 227–242. doi:10.1080/10573560152121010.
Poelma, J. (2002). Do parent educational aspirations affect the educational aspirations of adolescents with learning disabilities? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62(8-B), p. 3851.
Pryor, E., & Church, B. (1995). Family-school partnerships for the twenty-first century. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11(3), 297–303. doi:10.1080/1057356950110307.
Ryan, M. (2016). The number one way to succeed on the job is to use technology. The University of Michigan Dyslexia Help .Retrieved from http://dyslexiahelp.umich.edu/tools/software-assistive-technology
Ryan, B. A., & Adams, G. R. (1995). The family-school relationship model. In B. Ryan (Ed.), The family-school connection: theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–28). Beverly Hils, CA: Sage.
Strobel, W., Arthanat, S., Bauer, S., & Flagg, J. (2007). Universal design for learning: critical need areas for people with learning disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4(1), 81–98.
Teale, W., & Yokata, J. (2000). Beginning reading and writing: perspectives on instruction. In D. S. Strickland & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Beginning reading and writing (pp. 3–21). New York: Teachers College Press.
Thompson, C. (September 16, 2010). The pen that never forgets. The New York times magazine. Retrieved from http://..nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19Livescribe-t.html?_r=1
Wehmeyer, M., Palmer, S., Smith, S., Davies, D., & Stock, S. (2008). The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: a single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 21–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the USDOE OSEP #325 T Grants in Teacher Preparation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harper, K.A., Kurtzworth-Keen, K. & Marable, M.A. Assistive technology for students with learning disabilities: A glimpse of the livescribe pen and its impact on homework completion. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2471–2483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9555-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9555-0