Skip to main content
Log in

NAFLD Induction Delays Postoperative Liver Regeneration of ALPPS in Rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) is a promising two-step hepatectomy that is beneficial for accumulative regeneration of the future liver remnant (FLR) and avoids postoperative liver failure.

Aims

Our study aimed to evaluate whether nonalcoholic fatty liver disease affected the liver regeneration induced by ALPPS.

Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats fed a high-fat diet were used to construct the NAFLD model. ALPPS were performed, and blood and future liver remnant samples were collected at postoperative days 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD7.

Results

The hepatic regeneration rate (HRR) of ALPPS was higher than that of portal vein ligation (PVL) at POD3 and POD7 (p < 0.05), and the number of Ki-67-positive hepatocytes (POD3) and CD68-positive Kupffer cells (POD7) per visual field was higher in the ALPPS group than in the PVL group (p < 0.05). The serum TNF-α, hepatocyte growth factor protein, and the serum IL-6 level were higher in the ALPPS group than in the PVL group at POD3 and POD7. Compared with those of the standard laboratory diet (SLD)-fed rats, the rats with NAFLD exhibited a decrease in the HRR, Ki-67-positive hepatocytes, and CD68-positive Kupffer cells in the FLR. The number of CD68-positive Kupffer cells was lower in rats with NAFLD than that in SLD-fed rats; noteworthily, the serum level of IL-6 and TNF-α changed dramatically after surgeries.

Conclusions

NAFLD induction delayed liver regeneration induced by the ALPPS procedure, which might be associated with hepatocyte proliferation and the number of Kupffer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FLR:

Portal vein ligation

SLD:

Standard laboratory diet

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

LML:

Left median lobe

LLL:

Left lateral lobe

PLF:

Postoperative liver failure

PBE:

Portal branch embolization

TCHO:

Total cholesterol

ALPPS:

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

References

  1. Clavien PA, Oberkofler CE, Raptis DA, Lehmann K, Rickenbacher A, El-Badry AM. What is critical for liver surgery and partial liver transplantation: size or quality? Hepatology. 2010;52:715–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149:713–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012;255:405–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Makuuchi M, Takayasu K, Takuma T, et al. Preoperative transcatheter embolization of the portal venous branch for patients receiving extended lobectomy due to the bile duct carcinoma. J Jpn Pract Surg Soc. 1984;45:1558–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budai A, Fulop A, Hahn O, et al. Animal models for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): achievements and future perspectives. Eur Surg Res. 2017;58:140–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellentani S. The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2017;37:81–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baffy G, Brunt EM, Caldwell SH. Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an emerging menace. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1384–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White DL, Kanwal F, El-Serag HB. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk for hepatocellular cancer, based on systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1342–1359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Picard C, Lambotte L, Starkel P, et al. Steatosis is not sufficient to cause an impaired regenerative response after partial hepatectomy in rats. J Hepatol. 2002;36:645–652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao MS, Papreddy K, Abecassis M, Hashimoto T. Regeneration of liver with marked fatty change following partial hepatectomy in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:1821–1826. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010654908938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garnol T, Kucera O, Stankova P, Lotkova H, Cervinkova Z. Does simple steatosis affect liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats? Acta Med (Hradec Kralove). 2016;59:35–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamauchi H, Uetsuka K, Okada T, Nakayama H, Doi K. Impaired liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in db/db mice. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2003;54:281–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeAngelis RA, Markiewski MM, Taub R, Lambris JD. A high-fat diet impairs liver regeneration in C57BL/6 mice through overexpression of the NF-kappaB inhibitor, IkappaBalpha. Hepatology. 2005;42:1148–1157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murata H, Yagi T, Iwagaki H, et al. Mechanism of impaired regeneration of fatty liver in mouse partial hepatectomy model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2173–2180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Veteläinen RVVAV. Severe steatosis increases hepatocellular injury and impairs liver regeneration in a rat model of partial hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;1:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamano M, Ezaki H, Kiso S, et al. Lipid overloading during liver regeneration causes delayed hepatocyte DNA replication by increasing ER stress in mice with simple hepatic steatosis. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:305–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Caldwell SH. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: summary of an AASLD Single Topic Conference. Hepatology. 2003;37:1202–1219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlegel A, Lesurtel M, Melloul E, et al. ALPPS: from human to mice highlighting accelerated and novel mechanisms of liver regeneration. Ann Surg. 2014;260:839–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao L, Li C, Ge X, et al. Establishment of a rat model of portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting. Plos One. 2014;9:e105511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi H, Yang G, Zheng T, et al. A preliminary study of ALPPS procedure in a rat model. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei W, Zhang T, Zafarnia S, et al. Establishment of a rat model: associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Surgery. 2016;159:1299–1307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Pérez R, Revilla-Nuin B, Martínez CM, et al. Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) versus selective portal vein ligation (PVL) for staged hepatectomy in a rat model Similar regenerative response? PLoS One. 2015;10:e144096.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Almau TH, Moulin LE, Padin JM, Stringa P, Gondolesi GE, Barros SP. Development of an experimental model of portal vein ligation associated with parenchymal transection (ALPPS) in rats. Cir Esp. 2014;92:676–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhar DK, Mohammad GH, Vyas S, et al. A novel rat model of liver regeneration: possible role of cytokine induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 in augmented liver regeneration. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2015;9:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Michalopoulos GK. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Moris D, Vernadakis S, Papalampros A, et al. Mechanistic insights of rapid liver regeneration after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for stage hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:7613–7624.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishiyama K, Nakashima H, Ikarashi M, et al. Mouse CD11b+ Kupffer cells recruited from bone marrow accelerate liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Plos One. 2015;10:e136774.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shiratori Y, Hongo S, Hikiba Y, et al. Role of macrophages in regeneration of liver. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:1939–1946. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ. Liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2006;43:S45–S53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cressman DE, Greenbaum LE, DeAngelis RA, et al. Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Science. 1996;274:1379–1383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aldeguer X, Debonera F, Shaked A, et al. Interleukin-6 from intrahepatic cells of bone marrow origin is required for normal murine liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2002;35:40–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J, Kubes P. A reservoir of mature cavity macrophages that can rapidly invade visceral organs to affect tissue repair. Cell. 2016;165:668–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hsiao IT, Lin KJ, Chang SI, Yen TC, Chen TC, Yeh TS. Impaired liver regeneration of steatotic rats after portal vein ligation: a particular emphasis on (99 m)Tc-DISIDA scintigraphy and adiponectin signaling. J Hepatol. 2010;52:540–549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fund for Science and Technology Development of Jilin Province (20160101060JC, 20150101108JC); the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0502200, 2016YFD0501302); the Project of the Education Department of Jilin Province (No. 2016444).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Xu, H., Li, Y. et al. NAFLD Induction Delays Postoperative Liver Regeneration of ALPPS in Rats. Dig Dis Sci 64, 456–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5346-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5346-3

Keywords

Navigation