Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparisons of Fluticasone to Budesonide in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Topical steroids are first-line treatment agents for eosinophilic esophagitis; however, some studies have demonstrated modest efficacy in inducing histologic remission.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine response to two topical steroids (fluticasone and budesonide), compare their efficacy, and examine patient characteristics which could predict non-response to topical steroids.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of an established EoE registry. Inclusion criteria were patients >1 year of age who were diagnosed with EoE as defined by the most recent consensus guidelines. All patients were treated with an 8-week course of either swallowed fluticasone or viscous budesonide. Responders were defined as achieving <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) in both proximal and distal esophageal biopsies. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features were examined.

Results

The study cohort included 75 EoE patients with a median age of 33 years (range 2–64 years), 71 % adults, 84 % male, and 76 % Caucasian. Overall histologic response rate to topical steroids was 51 %, while clinical response was 71 %. There was no significant differences in histologic response to treatment between children and adults (68 vs. 44 %, p = 0.111). There was no significant difference in response between males and females (47 vs. 73 %, p = 0.191) and between the two types of steroids (48 vs. 56 %, p = 0.632). Responders and non-responders were similar in clinical presentation and baseline endoscopic findings. Following treatment, responders had significantly less peak proximal (4.0 ± 4.4 vs. 46 ± 53, p < 0.001) and distal eosinophil counts (3.5 ± 3.8 vs. 60 ± 47, p < 0.001) compared to non-responders. There were no predictors of response to steroids identified.

Conclusions

Histologic response to treatment was observed in approximately half the cohort, while more than two-thirds experienced clinical response to topical steroids. Response was similar between fluticasone and budesonide. Given the lack of differences in clinical presentation or endoscopic features, predictors of non-response were not seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EoE:

Eosinophilic esophagitis

PPI:

Proton-pump inhibitor

eos/hpf:

Eosinophils per high-powered field

PPI-REE:

Proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia

References

  1. Dellon ES, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, et al. ACG clinical guideline: evidenced based approach to the diagnosis and management of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:679–692. (quiz 693).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:3e6–20e6. (quiz 21–22).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Noel RJ, Putnam PE, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:940–941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora AS, Perrault J, Smyrk TC. Topical corticosteroid treatment of dysphagia due to eosinophilic esophagitis in adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:830–835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Remedios M, Campbell C, Jones DM, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: clinical, endoscopic, histologic findings, and response to treatment with fluticasone propionate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander JA, Jung KW, Arora AS, et al. Swallowed fluticasone improves histologic but not symptomatic response of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:742 e1–749 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Konikoff MR, Noel RJ, Blanchard C, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluticasone propionate for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1381–1391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson KA, Thomas KL, Hilden K, et al. Comparison of esomeprazole to aerosolized, swallowed fluticasone for eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1313–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butz BK, Wen T, Gleich GJ, et al. Efficacy, dose reduction, and resistance to high-dose fluticasone in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:324 e5–333 e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Straumann A, Conus S, Degen L, et al. Budesonide is effective in adolescent and adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1526–1537. (1537 e1).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aceves SS, Bastian JF, Newbury RO, et al. Oral viscous budesonide: a potential new therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis in children. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2271–2279. (quiz 2280).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dohil R, Newbury R, Fox L, et al. Oral viscous budesonide is effective in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:418–429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta SK, Vitanza JM, Collins MH. Efficacy and safety of oral budesonide suspension in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:66 e3–76 e3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellon ES, Sheikh A, Speck O, et al. Viscous topical is more effective than nebulized steroid therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:321 e1–324 e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moawad FJ, Dellon ES, Achem SR, et al. Effects of Race and Sex on Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015.

  16. Boldorini R, Mercalli F, Oderda G. Eosinophilic oesophagitis in children: responders and non-responders to swallowed fluticasone. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:399–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Francis DL, Foxx-Orenstein A, Arora AS, et al. Results of ambulatory pH monitoring do not reliably predict response to therapy in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:300–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolf WA, Cotton CC, Green DJ, et al. Predictors of response to steroid therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis and treatment of steroid-refractory patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:452–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Dustin M. Albert, Theresa A. Heifert, Steve B. Min, and Fouad J. Moawad substantially contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the final version to be published. Corinne L. Maydonovitch and Thomas P. Baker analyzed and interpreted the data; drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the final version to be published. Yen-Ju Chen acquired the data, drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final version to be published.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fouad J. Moawad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albert, D., Heifert, T.A., Min, S.B. et al. Comparisons of Fluticasone to Budesonide in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 61, 1996–2001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4110-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4110-9

Keywords

Navigation