Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential Action and Beliefs Under Partially Observable DSGE Environments

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a classification of DSGEs from a Markovian perspective, and positions the class of Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) to the center of a generalization of linear rational expectations models. The analysis of the POMDP class builds on the previous development in dynamic controls for linear system, and derives a solution algorithm by formulating an equilibrium as a fixed point of an operator that maps what we observe into what we believe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baxter B., Graham L., Wright S. (2011) Invertible and non-invertible information sets in linear rational expectations models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35(3): 295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., & Pesaran, M. H. (1995). Multivariate rational expectations models and macroeconometric modeling: A review and some new results. In M. H. Pesaran & M. R. Wickens (Eds.), Handbook of applied econometrics: Macroeconomics and finance. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Gali, J. (2007). A new Keynesian model with unemployment. Center for Financial Studies CFS working paper no. 2007/08.

  • Blanchard O., Kahn J. (1980) The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica 48(5): 1305–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagetti M., Hansen L. P., Sargent T., Williams N. (2002) Robustness and pricing with uncertain growth. Review of Financial Studies 15(2): 363–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassandra, A. (2005). Partially observable Markov decision processes. http://www.pomdp.org/pomdp/pomdp-faq.shtml.

  • Curdia, V. (2008). Optimal monetary policy under sudden stops. Staff report no. 323. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

  • Gertler, M., & Karadi, P. (2009). A model of unconventional monetary policy. New York University manuscript.

  • Geweke, J. (1999). Computational experiments and reality. Society for Computational Economics, Computing in Economics and Finance, paper no. 401.

  • Geweke J. (2001) A note on some limitations of CRRA utility. Economics Letters 71(3): 341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J. D. (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelbling L., Littman M., Cassandra A. (1998) Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101: 99–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick D., Amman H. (2006) A classification system for economic stochastic control models. Computational Economics 27: 453–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King R. G., Watson M. W. (1998) The solution of singular linear difference systems under rational expectations. International Economic Review 39(4): 1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein P. (2000) Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 24: 1405–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland F. E., Prescott E. C. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50(6): 1345–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littman M. (2009) A tutorial on partially observable Markov decision processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53(3): 119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni G. (2009) A theory of demand shocks. American Economic Review 99(5): 2050–2084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R. E. (1978) Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46(6): 1429–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum B. T. (1998) Solutions to linear rational expectations models: A compact exposition. Economics Letters 61(2): 143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W. (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258: 1315–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou A. (1927) Industrial fluctuations. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent T. (1991) Equilibrium with signal extraction from endogenous variables. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15(2): 245–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Grohe S., Uribe M. (2004) Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 28: 755–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets F., Wouters R. (2003) An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(5): 1123–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondik, E. (1971). The optimal control of partially observable Markov decision processes. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

  • Svensson L., Woodford M. (2003) Indicator variables for optimal policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 50(3): 691–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L., Woodford M. (2004) Indicator variables for optimal policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28(4): 661–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend R. M. (1983) Forecasting the forecasts of others. Journal of Political Economy 91(4): 546–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman M. L. (2007) Subjective expectations and asset-return puzzles. American Economic Review 97(4): 1102–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Hoon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SH. Sequential Action and Beliefs Under Partially Observable DSGE Environments. Comput Econ 40, 219–244 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-012-9323-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-012-9323-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation