Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Governmentality and the War on Terror: FBI Project Carnivore and the Diffusion of Disciplinary Power

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social control capabilities have increased significantly over the past several decades, particularly because of an increased utilization of technologically advanced surveillance methods. Following the tragic events of September 11,2001, U.S. Congress and the present Administration have granted law enforcement considerable new powers in the enforcement and prevention of terrorism-related crime. Collectively labeled under the heading of the so-called ‘‘war on terror’’ , the scope of such laws, policies and directives are challenged by civil rights organizations and numerous legislators for lack of definitional precision, arbitrary application of sanctions, and violation of privacy laws. One of federal law enforcement’s surveillance tools is ‘‘Project Carnivore,’’ a Justice Department Internet surveillance program that is administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to access information flowing to and from a central processing unit on a network connection. While, theoretically relying on Michel Foucault’s theory of discipline and governmentality, as well as related insights in the social control literature, this paper examines Project Carnivore relative to the larger context of state rationality and related privacy issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Civil Liberties Union (2002) Insatiable Appetite: The Government’s Demand for New and Unnecessary Powers After September 11. Author Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Civil Liberties Union (2003) The ACLU in the Courts Since 9/11. Author Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Baddeley (1997) Govemmentality B.D. Loader (Eds) The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring Routledge London 64–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdis, T. (2001). Justice Department asks Congress to clear wide-ranging antiterrorism legislation. The Wall Street Journal (September 19), A4.

  • D. Black (1976) The Behavior of Law Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Black (1993) The Social Structure of Right and Wrong Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cohen (1985) Visions of Social Control Polity Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, J.E. (2000a). Editorial Responses, 24 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov

  • Collingwood, J.E. (2000b). Editorial Responses, 25 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov

  • Collingwood, J.E. (2000c). Editorial Responses, 7 August. Available Online: www.fbi.gov

  • M. Deflem (1997) Surveillance and criminal statistics: Historical foundations of governmentality A. Sarat S. Silbey (Eds) Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. 17 JAI Press Greenwich, CT 149–184

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Deflem (Eds) (2004) Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, Vol. 5. Elsevier Science Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • G.S. Dunham (2002) ArticleTitleCarnivore, the FBI’s e-mail surveillance system: Devouring criminals, not privacy Federal Communications Law Journal 54 543–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, D. (2002a). Carnivore glitches blamed for FBI woes. Washington Post (May 29), A7.

  • Eggen, D. (2002b). FBI misused wiretaps, according to memo. Washington Post (October 10), A14.

  • Electronic Frontier Foundation (2000). “The Fourth Amendment and Carnivore.’’ Statement of The Electronic Frontier Foundation Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary. United States House of Representatives, July 28, 2000. Available Online: www.eef.org

  • Electronic Frontier Foundation (2003). “Chilling Effects of Anti-Terrorism’’. Available Online: www.eef.org

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000a). “Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 7/24/00’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000b). “Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 9/6/00’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2003). “Carnivore Diagnostic Tool’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov

  • M. Foucault (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison Vintage Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 Pantheon Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault (1981) ‘Omnes et Singulatim’. Towards a criticism of ‘Political reason’ S. M. McMurrin (Eds) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2. University of Utah Press Salt Lake City 223–254

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault (1991) Governmentality G. Burchell C. Gordon P. Miller (Eds) The Foucault Effect University of Chicago Press Chicago 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Garland (1997) ArticleTitle‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology Theoretical Criminology 1 IssueID2 173–214

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gilman (2001) ArticleTitleCarnivore: The uneasy relationship between the Fourth Amendment and electronic surveillance of internet communications CommLaw Conspectus 9 111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gooldstein C.H. Orr (2003) ArticleTitleApplication of the U.S.A. Patriot Act to criminal investigations violates the First and Fourth Amendments. Texas Bar Journal 66 IssueID2 40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gordon (1991) Governmental rationality: An introduction G. Burchell C. Gordon P. Miller (Eds) The Foucault Effect University of Chicago Press Chicago 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugliotta, G. and Krim, J. (2001). Push for increased surveillance worries some. Washington Post (September 25), A4.

  • T.C. Haas (2001) ArticleTitleCarnivore and the Fourth Amendment Connecticut Law Review 34 261–291

    Google Scholar 

  • P.K. Holmes (2001) ArticleTitleFBI’s Carnivore: Is the government eating away our right of privacy Roger Williams University Law Review 7 247–272

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIIT Research Institute (2000) Evaluation of Carnivore Diagnostic Tool Author Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, T. (2003). Judges uphold US detention of Hamdi. Washington Post (January 9), AI.

  • C.S. Lerner (2003) ArticleTitleThe reasonableness of probable cause Texas Law Review 81 IssueID4 951–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Marx (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. University of California Press Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Marx (1998) ArticleTitleAn ethics for the new surveillance The Information Society 14 IssueID3 171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Marx (1999) Measuring everything that moves: The new surveillance at work I. Simpson R. Simpson (Eds) The Workplace and Deviance. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 8. JAI Greenwich, CT 165–189

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Marx (2002) Technology and social control N. Smelser P. Baltes (Eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Pergamon Oxford, UK 15506–15511

    Google Scholar 

  • S.R. Merl (2001) ArticleTitleInternet communication standards for the 21st century: International terrorism must force the U.S. to adopt ‘Carnivore’ and new electronic surveillance standards. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 27 245–284

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Merton (1936) ArticleTitleThe unanticipated consequences of purposive social action American Sociological Review 1 IssueID6 894–904

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Harrow, R. (2001). FBI’s Carnivore might target wireless text. Washington Post (August 24), E1.

  • Rosen, J. (2002). Liberty wins: So far Bush runs into checks and balances in demanding new powers. Washington Post (September 15), Bl.

  • Scheeres, J. (2001). “Suppression Stifles Some Sites’’. Available online: www.wired.com.

  • J. Stanley B. Steinhardt (2003) Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The Growth of an American Surveillance Society ACLU New York

    Google Scholar 

  • StopCarnivoreNow (2003). “The Backdoor, the Rogue Agent, and the Mishap: The Hidden Dangers of Carnivore’’. Available online: www.stopcarnivore.org

  • A.Y. Strauss (2002) ArticleTitleA constitutional crisis in the digital age: Why the FBI’s ‘Carnivore’ does not defy the Fourth Amendment Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 20 231–258

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Tountas (2003) ArticleTitleCarnivore: Is the regulation of wireless technology a legally viable option to curtail the growth of cybercrime Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 11 351–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, J. (2003) “How Carnivore Works’’. Available online: www.howthingswork.com United States v. Katz (1967). 389 U.S. 347.

  • Vlahos, KB. (2001). “FBI Seeking to Wiretap Internet’’. Available online: www.foxnews.com

  • M.P. Voors (2003) ArticleTitleEncryption regulation in the wake of September 11, 2001: Must we protect national security at the expense of the economy Federal Communications Law Journal 55 IssueID22 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Walters (2003) ArticleTitleNew modes of governance and the commodification of criminological knowledge Social and Legal Studies 12 IssueID1 5–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina, USA

    Holly E. Ventura, J. Mitchell Miller & Mathieu Deflem

Authors
  1. Holly E. Ventura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Mitchell Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathieu Deflem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ventura, H.E., Miller, J.M. & Deflem, M. Governmentality and the War on Terror: FBI Project Carnivore and the Diffusion of Disciplinary Power. Crit Crim 13, 55–70 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6167-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6167-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation