Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Willingness to Cooperate with the Police in Four Central European Countries

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social order and security depend on mutual cooperation between the police and the public. Since the majority of crime is not detected by the police itself, informal control is needed to ensure order in society. This article aims to describe the circumstances under which people´s willingness to cooperate with the police is enhanced. Recent studies show that public compliance and cooperation with authorities who carry out criminal proceedings are linked with the extent to which people perceive these authorities as trustworthy and legitimate. Importantly, trust in police procedural fairness leads to the perception that institutions of justice are legitimate, which in turn enhances people´s willingness to cooperate with them in order to fight crime and disorder. This normative perspective is supported in many European countries. However, evidence exists that instrumental judgements, which focus on one´s self-interest and on outcomes of the justice system, could also be important in some countries. Drawing on procedural justice theory, we examine the importance of normative and instrumental factors in eliciting people´s readiness to help the police fight crime in four Central European countries: the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Hungary, and Poland. While the procedural justice pattern, i.e. the normative perspective, holds well in the Czech Republic and Hungary, in other analysed countries trust in police effectiveness or fear of crime, i.e. instrumental judgements, are relevant too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The concept of fear of crime was also part of the original proposal to the ESS R5 rotated module. For more information see http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round5/questionnaire/ESS5_final_trust_in_police_courts_module_template.pdf (Accessed 20 October 2014).

  2. ESS Round 5: European Social Survey Round 5 Data (2010). Data file edition 3.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.

References

  • Aebi, M. F. (2006). Comment mesurer la délinquance? Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aebi, M. F., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., Barclay, G., Gruszczyńska, B., Harrendorf, S., Heiskanen, M., Vasilika, H., Jaquier, V., Jehle, J.-M., Killias, M., Shostko, O., Smit, P., Þórisdóttir, R. (2010). European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics. The Hague, Home Office, Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Cesdip, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en documentatiecentrum. https://english.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/european-sourcebook-4e-editie.aspx. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2010). Cooperating with the Police: Social Control and the Reproduction of Police Legitimacy. Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1640958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., Huq, A. Z., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & Governance. doi:10.1111/rego.12012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buriánek, J. (2014). From Patience to problems: the Czech Experience of the transition. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philosophica et Historica, 2, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caparini, M., & Marenin, O. (2005). Crime, Insecurity and Police Reform in Post-Socialist CEE. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies. http://pipss.revues.org/330. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Čermák, D., & Stachová, J. (2010). Zdroje institucionální důvěry v České republice. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 46(5), 683–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S. (2001). Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, B. J., & Burgess, M. B. (2012). Putting Fear of Crime on the Map. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey. (2011). Trust in justice: topline results from round 5 of the European Social Survey. European Social Survey. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS5_toplines_issue_1_trust_in_justice.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • European Social Survey. (2012). Policing by consent: Understanding the dynamics of police power and legitimacy´, ESS Country Specific Topline Results Series Issue 1 (UK). Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168702. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., & Gadd, D. (2004). Research Note: The Frequency of the Fear of Crime. British Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1093/bjc/44.1.127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. F., & LaGrange, R. L. (1987). The Measurement of Fear of Crime. Sociological Inquiry. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1987.tb01181.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E., Jackson, J., & Farrall, S. (2008). Reassessing the Fear of Crime. European Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/1477370808090834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. (1996). Fear of Crime: A Review of the Literature. International Review of Victimology. doi:10.1177/026975809600400201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy. Policing. doi:10.1093/police/paq027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013a). Legitimacy, Trust and Compliance: An Empirical Test of Procedural Justice Theory Using European Social Survey. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration (pp. 326–352). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013b). The drivers of police legitimacy: Some European research. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, doi:. doi:10.1080/18335330.2013.821735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013c). The Governance of Criminal Justice, Legitimacy and Trust. In S. Body-Gendrot, R. Lévy, M. Hough, S. Snacken, & K. Kerezsi (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of European Criminology (pp. 243–265). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., & Sunshine, J. (2007). Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective. British Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1093/bjc/azl031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M., & Galev, T. (2011). Developing European indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/1477370811411458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., & Hough, M. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2013). Just authority?: Trust in the Police in England and Wales. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Kuha, J., & Hough, M. (2014). Empirical legitimacy as two connected psychological states. In G. Mesko & J. Tankebe (Eds.), Improving Legitimacy of Criminal Justice in Emerging Democracies. London: Springer. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/57216/. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., & Eva, G. (2007). Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. I. (2001). The impact of transition: A comparison of post-communist societies with earlier “societies in transition.”. In A. Kádár (Ed.), Police in transition (pp. 19–35). Hungary: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., Fields, C. B., Lobnikar, B., & Sotlar, A. (2013). Handbook on Policing in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer

  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies. The Journal of Politics. doi:10.2307/2998171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J. (1971). The Police and the Public. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory. American Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1086/229068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science. doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapsford, R., & Abbott, P. (2006). Trust, confidence and social environment in post-communist societies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.12.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedláčková, M. (2006). Obecná důvěra v druhé lidi jako dimenze sociální soudržnosti. In M. Tuček (Ed.), Soudržnost společnosti z pohledu české veřejnosti (pp. 149–165). Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedláčková, M. (2012). Důvěra a demokracie: přehled sociologických teorií důvěry od Tocquevilla po transformaci v postkomunistických zemích. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šelih, A., & Završnik, A. (2012). Crime and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankebe, J. (2009). Public Cooperation with the Police in Ghana: Does Procedural Fairness Matter? Criminology. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00175.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing Things Differently: The Dimensions of Public Perceptions of Police Legitimacy. Criminology. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 307–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S. (2009). Trust in the justice system: A comparative view across Europe. Prison Service Journal, 183, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J., van Kesteren, J., & Smit, P. (2007). Criminal victimisation in international perspective: key findings from the 2004-2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Key Findings from the. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

  • Visegrad Group. (2014). History of the Visegrad Group. Visegrad Group. http://www.visegradgroup.eu/about/history. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, P., Diblíková, S., Trávníčková, I., & Tomášek, J. (2010). Názory a postoje občanů v oblasti trestní politiky. Praha: Institut pro kriminologii a sociální prevenci.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Moravcová.

Additional information

This text was created with support of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, grant project no. LM2010012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moravcová, E. Willingness to Cooperate with the Police in Four Central European Countries. Eur J Crim Policy Res 22, 171–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9271-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9271-0

Keywords

Navigation