Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of “As Many As Can” Versus “Feel Like Continuing” Stop Rules During Worrying

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies are reported that investigated the processes involved in stopping worry. Study 1 found that the use of “as many as can” stop rules was significantly related to measures of trait worry and beliefs about the positive and negative consequences of worrying, and Study 2 demonstrated that the reported use of “as many as can” stop rules significantly predicted perseveration on behavioral measures of catastrophic worrying. Reported use of “feel like continuing” stop rules was unrelated to any measures of worry in both studies. These results indicate that the use of “as many as can” stop rules is a highly significant predictor of worry frequency and perseveration, and that beliefs about the positive and negative consequences of worry also independently predict the use of “as many as can” stop rules. These findings are consistent with (1) the view that the stop rules used by worriers are closely associated with, or directly derived from, the more stable, global beliefs that worriers hold about the utility of the worry process, and (2) predictions from the mood-as-input model of catastrophic worrying (H. M. Startup & G. C. L. Davey, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington DC.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC.

  • Borkovec, T. D., & Roemer, L. (1995). Perceived functions of worry among generalized anxiety disorder subjects: Distraction from more emotionally distressing topics. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 25–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhar, S. et al. (2001). Psychometric validation of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire and the interpretation of intrusions inventory: Part I. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 863–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Diaz, M. L. (1999). The role of positive beliefs about worry in generalized anxiety disorder and its treatment. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitholtz, E., Westling, B. E., & Ost, L. -G. (1998). Cognitions in generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder patients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 567–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., Antony, M. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1992). Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 33–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L. (1993). A comparison of three worry questionnaires. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 51–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L. (1994). Pathological worrying as exacerbated problem solving. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L., Hampton, J., Farrell, J. J., & Davidson, S. (1992). Some characteristics of worry: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L., Tallis, F., & Capuzzo, N. (1996). Beliefs about the consequences of worrying. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20, 599–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L., & Levy, S. (1998). Catastrophic worrying: Personal inadequacy and a perseverative iterative style as features of the catastrophizing process. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 576–586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L., Startup, H. M., Zara, A., MacDonald, C. A., & Field, A. P. (2003). The perseveration of Checking thoughts and mood-as-input hypothesis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 141–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 593–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionsism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, D. W., & Lewis, S. J. (1987). The assessment of shame and guilt. In C. D. Speilberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment (Vol. 6, pp. 89–114.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, D. W., & Zalma, A. (1990). Two promising shame and guilt scales: A construct validity comparison. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 729–745.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. M., & Davey, G. C. L. (1997). The psychological impact of negative TV news bulletins: The catastrophizing of personal worries. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 85–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). The future for cognitive assessment of anxiety: Let’s get specific. In L. Michaelson & L. M. Ascher (Eds.), Anxiety and stress disorders: Cognitive-behavioral assessment and treatment. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Talbot, F., & Dugas, M. J. (1997). Behavioural expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry. Behavior Modification, 21, 355–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. & Davies, B. (1998). Beyond Hedonism and associationism: A configural view of the role of affect in evaluation, processing, and self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, R. L., Miller, M. L., Cohen, M., Sofka, M., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Worry changes decision making: The effect of negative thoughts on cognitive processing. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, P., Tallis, F., & Eysenck, M. (1997). Information-processing, storage characteristics and worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1015–1023.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rheaume, J., Ladouceur, R., Freeston, M. H., & Letarte, H. (1994). Inflated responsibility and its role in OCD. II. Psychometric studies of a semi-idiographic measure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, L., Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1997). An investigation of worry content among anxious individuals. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 185, 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M., Rachman, S., Ladouceur, R., Freeston, M., Taylor, S., Kyrios, M., & Sica, C. (1996). Defining responsibility in obsessional problems. In OC Beliefs Working Group. Northamptonshire: Smith College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the Stait-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startup, H. M. (2001). Mood-as input and catastrophic worrying. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex.

  • Startup, H. M., & Davey, G. C. L. (2001). Mood-As-Input and Catastrophic Worrying. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 83–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Startup, H. M., & Davey, G. C. L. (2003). Inflated responsibility and the use of stop rules for catastrophic worrying. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 495–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steketee, G. et al. (2001). Development and initial validation of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire and the interpretation of intrusions inventory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 987–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis, F., Eysenck, M. W., & Mathews, A. (1991). Elevated evidence requirements and worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, M., & Borkovec, T. D. (1992). A catastrophizing assessment of worrisome thoughts. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., & Mason, A. (2002). Mood as input and rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Relationships between worry, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 899–913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sussex, UK

    Graham C. L. Davey Ph.D. (Professor of Psychology), Helen M. Startup, C. Benie MacDonald, Deborah Jenkins & Kate Patterson

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK

    Graham C. L. Davey Ph.D. (Professor of Psychology)

Authors
  1. Graham C. L. Davey Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen M. Startup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Benie MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deborah Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kate Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham C. L. Davey Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davey, G.C.L., Startup, H.M., MacDonald, C.B. et al. The Use of “As Many As Can” Versus “Feel Like Continuing” Stop Rules During Worrying. Cogn Ther Res 29, 155–169 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-3162-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-3162-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation