Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regulation and shadow economy: empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New empirical findings for the impact of regulations on economic activities in the shadow economy are presented here. A comprehensive regulation index covering major fields (e.g. labour and product market regulation and the quality of institutions) has been used to analyze the relationship between the density of regulations and the size of shadow economies. The empirical results from 25 OECD countries for the time period 1995–2005 show that—apart from tax burden and tax moral—main causes for the development of the size of shadow economies are labour and product market regulations, overall regulations and poor quality of official public institutions and administration. These findings can provide additional information on policy measures to tackle the problem of growing shadow economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison, J. T., & Teixeira, P. (2003). The economics of employment protection. Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 85–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajada, C., & Schneider, F. (2005). Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy. Farnham: Ashgate.

  • Berger, H., & Daninger, S. (2005). Labor and product market deregulation: Partial, sequential, or simultaneous reform? IMF Working Papers 05/227, International Monetary Fund, Washington.

  • Boockmann, B., & Rincke, J. (2005). Wirksamkeit der Bekämpfung der Schwarzarbeit durch die “Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit” – empirische Untersuchung der Entwicklung der Schwarzarbeit und des hierauf bezogenen Bewusstseins- und Wertwandels – Machbarkeitsstudie. Berlin: BMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botero, J., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shliefer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouev, M. (2005). State regulations, job search and wage bargaining: A study in the economics of the informal sector. Working paper Nr. 764, William Davidson Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Conway, P., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in the non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: Measurements and highlights. OECD Working Papers, Nr. 530, Paris.

  • Conway, P., Janod, V., & Nicoletti, G. (2005). Product market regulation in OECD countries: 1998 to 2003. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Nr. 419, Paris.

  • Davis, S. J., & Henrekson, M. (2005). Tax effects on work activity, industry mix and shadow economy size: Evidence from rich country comparison. In R. Gomez Salvador et al. (Eds.), Labour supply and incentives to work in Europe (pp. 44–111). Cheltenham: Elgar.

  • de Soto, H. (1989). The other path. New York: Harpercollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enste, D. H. (2005). The shadow economy in OECD and EU accession countries– empirical evidence for the influence of institutions, liberalization, taxation and regulation. In C. Bajada & F. Schneider (Eds.), Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy. Hants.

  • Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2006a). IW-Regulierungsindex: Methode, Analyse und Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs, IW-Analyse Nr. 16, Köln.

  • Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2006b). Regulierung, Arbeitsplatzsicherheit und Wohlbefinden, iw-trends 4/2006. Köln.

  • Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2007). Regulierung und Schattenwirtschaft, iw-trends 1/2007. Köln.

  • Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2008). Regulierung, Wohlstand und Beschäftigung – Eine empirische Wirkungsanalyse für 22 OECD-Länder. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 55, 819–838. Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enste, D. H., & Schneider, F. (Eds.) (2006). Jahrbuch Schattenwirtschaft 2006/2007. Muenster: LIT-Verlag.

  • EU-Commission. (2004). Undeclared work in an enlarged union. Brussels: Regioplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Commission. (2007). Undeclared work in the european union. Brussels: Special Eurobarometer 67.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Larsen, C. (2006). Strafen, Kontrollen und Schwarzarbeit: Einige Anmerkungen auf Basis von Befragungsdaten für Deutschland. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.

  • Fetchenhauer, D., Gresser, F., & Haferkamp, A. (2006). Ein Volk von Betrügern? Schwarzarbeit, Steuerhinterziehung und Versicherungsmissbrauch aus psychologischer Sicht. In Edited Volume “Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.

  • Fraser Institute. (2004). Economic freedom of the world 2004. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. (1984). The hidden economy: State and prospect for measurement. Review of Income and Wealth, 30(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1984). The hidden economy as an “unobserved” variable. European Economic Review, 26(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., & Mogee, M. E. (2004). Indicators for national science and technology policy: How robust are composite indicators? Research Policy, 33(9), 1373–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafemann, K., & van Suntum, U. (2004). Internationales Standort-Ranking 2004. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation (2005). Index of economic freedom. Washington.

  • Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2004). World competitiveness yearbook 2004. Lausanne.

  • International Monetary Fond (IMF). (2004). Annual report on exchange arrangements and exchange restrictions. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The unofficial economy in transition. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1998). Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemier, B. (2006). Monitoring the underground economy- a survey of methods and estimates. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.

  • Kirchgässner, G. (2006). Steuermoral und Schwarzarbeit. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.

  • Kladroba, A. (2005). Methodische Einflüsse auf die Ergebnisse von Rankings. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 56, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, M., & Strotmann, H. (2006). Steuermoral – Das Spannungsfeld von Freiwilligkeit und Regelverstoß durch Steuerhinterziehung. Tübingen: IAW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loayza, N. V., & Rigolini, J. (2006). Informality trends and cycles, Policy Research Working Paper Series 4078, The World Bank, Washington.

  • Loayza, N., Oviedo, A. M., & Serven, L. (2006). The impact of regulation on growth and informality cross-country evidence. In B. Guha-Khasnobis, R. Kanbur, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Linking the formal and informal economy, concepts and policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Giovannini, E., Hoffman, A., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics Working Paper, Nr. 3., OECD, Paris.

  • Nicoletti, G., & Pryor, F. L. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of governmental regulations in OECD nations. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 59, 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2005). Product market reforms and employment in OECD countries. In OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Nr. 472. Paris.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1997). The OECD report on regulatory reform, volume II: Thematic studies. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1999). OECD employment outlook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Measuring the non-observed economy. A handbook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). OECD employment outlook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renooy, P., Ivarsson, S., Wusten-Gritsai, O., & van der Meijer, R. (2004). Undeclared work in an enlarged Union - an analysis of undeclared work. An in-depth study of specific items. Final report. Brüssel.

  • Schneider, F. (2005). Shadow economies around the world: What do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy, 21(3), 598–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2002). The shadow economy. An international survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Pöll, G. (1999). Schattenwirtschaft. In Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik (pp. 382–432). Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlageshaus.

  • Tanzi, V. (1999). Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal, 109(June), 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thießen, U. (2003). The impact of fiscal policy and deregulation on the shadow economies in transition countries: The case of Ukranie. Public Choice, 114, 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. J. (1992). Informal economic activity. New York, London u.a. (Harvester/Weatsheaf).

  • Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2541.

  • World Bank. (2004). Doing business report. Washington D.C.

  • World Bank. (2005). Doing business report. Washington D.C.

  • World Bank. (2006). Doing business report. Washington D.C.

  • World Economic Forum (WEF). (2004). The global competitiveness report 2004–2005. Geneva.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to anonymous referees and to Friedrich Schneider for valuable comments on earlier drafts and to Hendrik Jürges for his great support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik H. Enste.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enste, D.H. Regulation and shadow economy: empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries. Const Polit Econ 21, 231–248 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-009-9081-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-009-9081-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation