Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Responses of Young People to Their Experiences of First-Episode Psychosis: Harnessing Resilience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a burgeoning literature on first-episode psychosis, the focus of which is early intervention. Little emphasis has been placed on the responses of young people to their experiences of psychosis. This study, therefore, aimed to describe and explain the responses of young people to their first episode of psychosis. Data obtained from ten young people who attended a community early intervention recovery program in Perth Western Australia were analysed using a grounded theory method. The results revealed that the basic psychosocial problem experienced by participants was loss of control resulting in disrupted lives and that the core variable, harnessing resilience, accounted for most of the variance in their behaviour to overcome this problem. The resultant framework described and explained how participants resiled and established direction in their lives. Although there are limitations with this qualitative study, such as the small size and the demographics of the sample, the findings have potential implications for approaches to service provision and phase specific interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andresen, R., Caputi, P., & Oades, L. (2006). Stages of recovery instrument: Development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 972–980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health services system in the 1990’s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C., & Jackson, J. S. (1990). The role of reciprocity in social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 173–198). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, D. (2004). Loss, trauma and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychology, 59(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell, D. (2009). Understanding “marginal” perspectives towards a social theory of resilience. Qualitative Social Work, 8(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boydell, K. M., Stasiulis, E., Volpe, T., & Gladstone, B. (2010). A descriptive review of qualitative studies in first episode psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 4, 7–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–537). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, L., & Petersen, A. (1993). Adolescent development: Health risks and opportunities for health promotion. In S. P. Millstein (Ed.), Promoting the health of adolescents: New direction for the twenty-first Century (pp. 13–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. G., & McGuinness, T. M. (1996). Resilience: Analysis of the concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(5), 276–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge, K., Yarrow, L., & Peet, M. (2004). Pathways to care in first episode psychosis. Journal of Psychiatric mental Health Nursing, 11(2), 125–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley California: The Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. R. (2011). A substantive theory of recovery from the effects of severe persistent mental illness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57(6), 564–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, R., Smith, J., Trower, P., & Griffin, C. (2005). What do psychotic experiences mean for young men? A qualitative investigation. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 78(2), 249–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, A. M., Esteroff, S. E., Perkins, D. O., & Penn, D. L. (2008). Recognizing and responding to early psychosis: A qualitative analysis of individual narratives. Psychiatric Services, 59(1), 96–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, A. M., Perkins, D. O., Nieri, J., & Penn, D. L. (2005). Pathways to care in first episode psychosis: A pilot study on help-seeking precipitants and barriers to care. Journal of Mental Health, 14(5), 465–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killackey, E., & Yung, A. R. (2007). Effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(2), 121–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, M. M., Pearson, V., Ng, R. M., Chiu, C. P., Law, C. W., & Chen, E. Y. (2010). What does recovery from psychosis means? Perceptions of young first-episode patients. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57(6), 580–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leiviskä Deland, A. C., Karlsson, G., & Fatouros-Bergman, H. (2011). A phenomenological analysis of the psychotic experience. Human Studies, 34, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, H., Marshall, M., Jones, P., Fowler, D., Amos, T., Kahn, N., et al. (2011). Views of young people in early intervention services for first-episode psychosis in England. Psychiatric Services, 62(8), 882–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, R. P. (2008). Recovery from disability: Manual of psychiatric rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 857–885.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, P. D., Hickie, I. B., Yung, A. R., Pantelis, C., & Jackson, H. J. (2006). Clinical staging of psychotic disorders: A heuristic framework for choosing earlier, safer and more effective interventions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(8), 616–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, P. D., & Yung, A. R. (2003). Early intervention in psychosis: An overdue reform. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37(4), 393–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, P. D., Yung, A. R., & Phillips, L. (2003). Ethics in early intervention in psychosis: Keeping up the pace and staying in step. Schizophrenia Research, 51(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C., Abdul-Al, R., Lappin, J. M., Jones, P., Fearon, P., Leese, M., et al. (2006). Clinical and social determinants of duration of untreated psychosis in the AESOP first-episode psychosis study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 446–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. M., Malla, A. K., Verdi, M. B., Hassall, L. D., & Fazekas, C. (2004). Understanding delay in treatment for first-episode psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 34(2), 255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman, S., & Anderson, P. (2011). Does prodromal diagnosis delay early intervention? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(7), 509–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, L., Birchwood, M., & Trower, P. (2003). Predicting engagement with services for psychosis: Insight, symptoms and recovery style. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 123–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tranulis, C., Park, L., Delano, L., & Good, B. (2009). Early intervention in psychosis: A case study on normal and pathological. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 33(4), 608–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the young people who participated in this study. We also thank Ms Jane Chadburn for her assistance with the research and preparation of the manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the Mental Health Commission of Western Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community, Culture and Mental Health Unit, School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, W Block L 6 Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, 6160, Western Australia

    Anthony R. Henderson

  2. Program Manager Early Intervention Recovery Program, Mental Illness Fellowship of WA, U 5/362 Fitzgerald St, North Perth, 6006, Western Australia

    Alan Cock

Authors
  1. Anthony R. Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Cock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony R. Henderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, A.R., Cock, A. The Responses of Young People to Their Experiences of First-Episode Psychosis: Harnessing Resilience. Community Ment Health J 51, 322–328 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9769-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9769-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation