Abstract
This study seeks to elucidate the interplay of interfirm rivalry and aspiration formation. Organizational aspiration serves as a categorical judgment over a desirable level of organizational performance. While aspiration as a driver of collective decision-making inside the firm is well recognized, our understanding is still limited as to the competitive consequence of aspiration-induced actions. From a computational model of aspiration-induced R&D, where competition is biased towards the status quo, this study suggests that although radical innovation calls for flexibility and diversity inside the firm, aspiration-induced action favors consensus such as a firm with machine bureaucracy either (1) in a market where a majority of consumers are unable to discern a small quality improvement, i.e., demand difficult to satisfy or (2) in a market where competitive advantage dissipates quickly, i.e., an unstable environment. In particular, this study shows that: (1) the level of organizational aspiration has little to do with the sustainability of competitive advantage; (2) aspiration strength—i.e., the extent of consensus among decision makers of the firm as to a legitimate level of organizational aspiration—interacts with the change in competitive advantage. The leading firm is likely to lose its competitive advantage when a follower has a stronger aspiration than the leader in a market whose demand is difficult to satisfy; and (3) the effect of aspiration strength on the sustainability of competitive advantage increases whenever organizational assets depreciate over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Admin Sci Quart 41(1):61–89
Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strat Manag J 23:667–688
Adner R, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation. Manag Sci 47(5):611–628
Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The red queen in organizational evolution. Strat Manag J 17:139–157
Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Manage Sci 42:1231–1241
Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Ann 3:65–107
Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ Sci 18(3):368–385
Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin Sci Quart 44:563–589
Capron L, Mitchell W (2012) Build, borrow or buy. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA
Carroll GR (1985) Concentration and specialization: dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Am J Soc 90:1262–1283
Chen M-J (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):100–134
Chen M-J, Miller D (2012) Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad Manag Ann 6:135–210
Christensen CM (1997) The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, MA
Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, NJ
Denrell J (2008) Organizational risk taking: adaptation versus variable risk preferences. Indust Corp Change 17(3):427–466
Diericks I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35(12):1504–1511
Diericks I, Cool K, Almeida-Costa L (2013) The dynamics of resource erosion. INSEAD Working Paper (2013/87/ST)
Dobrev S, Kim T-Y, Hannan MT (2001) Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. Am J Soc 106:1299–1337
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strat Manag J 21:1105–1121
Eisenstadt SN (1980) Cultural orientations, institutional entrepreneurs and social change: comparative analyses of traditional civilizations. Am J Soc 85:840–869
Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ Sci 20(1):4–21
Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Organ Studies 28(7):957–969
Gomes-Casseres B (2003) Competitive advantage in alliance constellations. Strat Organ 1(3):327–335
Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin Sci Quart 41:29–60
Greve HR (2002) Sticky aspirations: organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ Sci 13:1–17
Greve HR (2003a) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Acad Manag J 46(6):685–702
Greve HR (2003b) Organizational learning from performance feedback: a behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge University Press, New York
Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin Sci Quart 40:398–422
Hrebiniak LG (2005) Making strategy work. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: an empirical exploration. Manag Sci 38:623–644
Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2006) Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of firm and industry profits. Manag Sci 52(5):757–772
Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2007) Interdependency, competition, and industry dynamics. Manag Sci 53(4):599–615
Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strat Manag J 13:111–125
Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manag Sci 43(7):934–950
Levinthal DA, March JG (1981) A model of adaptive organizational search. J Econ Behav Organ 2:307–333
Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Organ Sci 14:95–112
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Soc 14:319–340
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych Rev 99:172–183
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York
Mezias S, Chen Y, Murphy P (2002) Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: a field study. Manag Sci 48:1285–1300
Miller KD, Chen W-R (2004) Variable organizational risk preferences: tests of the March-Shapira Model. Acad Manag J 47(1):105–115
Mosakowski E (1993) A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy-performance relationship: an empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in entrepreneurial firms. J Manag 19:819–839
Mosakowski E, McKelvey B (1997) Predicting rent generation in competence-based competition. In: Heene A, Sanchez R (eds) Competence-based strategic management. Wiley, New York
Moscovici S (1980) Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 13. Academic Press, New York, pp 209–239
Moscovici S, Zavalloni M (1969) The group as a polarizer of attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol 12:125–135
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, MA
Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strat Manag J 18:187–206
Oorschot KEV, Akkermans H, Sengupta K, Wassenhove LNV (2013) Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Acad Manag J 56:285–307
Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Zemsky P (2007) The timing of resource development and sustainable competitive advantage. Manag Sci 53(4):651–666
Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strat Manag J 14(3):179–191
Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Am J Soc 98:829–872
Posen H, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: exploration and exploitation in a dynamic environment. Manag Sci 58(3):587–601
Rhee M, Haunschild P (2006) The liability of good reputation: a study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organ Sci 17(1):101–117
Ridgeway CL, Erickson KG (2000) Creating and spreading status beliefs. Am J Soc 106:579–615
Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strat Manag J 23:1077–1093
Seo M, Creed D (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):222–247
Simon HA (1945) Administrative behavior. Macmillan, New York
Smith KG, Grimm CM, Gannon MJ, Chen M-J (1991) Organizational information processing, competitive responses and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Acad Manag J 34:60–85
Sorensen JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin Sci Quart 47:70–91
Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: synonyms or separate concepts? Strat Organ 12(1):62–69
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat Manag J 18(7):509–533
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource based view of the firm. Strat Manag J 5:171–180
White HC (2000) PARAMETERIZE! Notes on mathematical modelling for sociology. Sociol Theor 18(3):505–509
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, I., Bae, J. Politics, strong institution and competitive advantage: an examination of organizational aspiration for competition. Comput Math Organ Theory 22, 412–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-015-9206-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-015-9206-9