Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delayed carbon sequestration and rising carbon prices

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We set out a dynamic model to investigate optimal time paths of emissions, carbon stocks and carbon sequestration by land conversion, allowing for non-instantaneous carbon sequestration. Previous research in a dynamic general equilibrium framework, assuming instantaneous carbon sequestration, has shown that land conversion should take place as soon as possible. On the contrary, previous research within a partial equilibrium framework has shown that, with increasing carbon prices, it is optimal to delay carbon sequestration through land conversion. We show that land use change alternatives, e.g. reforestation, have to be used as soon as possible before the singular path is reached, i.e. the unique trajectory that brings the system to the steady-state. We also show that faster increasing carbon prices can induce a reduction in the rate of reforestation, and that this may take place after an initial phase of increased reforestations or even immediately, depending upon the shape of the increase in carbon prices. Finally, we show that the type of species used is relevant and that the land conversion rate gets smaller the longer it takes the trees to grow. We analyze four different carbon accounting methods, describing the conditions that make them efficient and discussing the comparative advantages of each of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberola E, Chevallier J (2007) European carbon prices and banking restrictions: evidence from phase I (2005–2007). Ecomomix Working Paper 2007-32

  • Caparrós A, Jacquemont F (2003) Conflicts between biodiversity and carbon offset programs: economic and legal implications. Ecol Econ 46:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caparrós A, Zilbermann D (2008) Optimal sequestration path when different biological or physical sequestration functions are available. AERNA 2008 conference, Mallorca, 4–6 June 2008

  • Caparrós A, Campos A, Martín D (2003) Influence of carbon dioxide abatement and recreational services on optimal forest rotation. Int J Sustain Dev 6(3):345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caparrós A, Cerdá E, Ovando P, Campos P (2009) Carbon Sequestration with reforestations and biodiversity-scenic values. Environ Resour Econ (forthcoming)

  • Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiol 11:49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Englin J, Callaway JM (1993) Global climate change and optimal forest management. Nat Resour Modeling 7(3):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Zhao J, Kling CL (2002) The time path and implementation of carbon sequestration. Am J Agric Econ 84(1):134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena JF (1975) Optimal control problems with delay, the maximum principle and necessary conditions. J Eng Math 9(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubowski RN, Plantinga AJ, Stavins RN (2006) Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function. J Environ Econ Manage 51:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura-Costa P, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration – description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 5(1):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olschewski R, Benitez PC (2005) Secondary forests as temporary carbon sinks? The economic impact of accounting methods on reforestation projects in the tropics. Ecol Econ 55:380–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragot L, Schubert K (2008) The optimal carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: do the dynamics of the physical process matter? J Econ Dyn Control 32:3847–3865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards KR, Sampson RN, Brown S (2006) Agricultural & forestlands: U.S. carbon policy strategies. PEW Center, Washington

  • Richards KR, Stokes C (2004) A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Clim Change 63:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R (2003) An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. Am J Agric Econ 85(2):448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins RN (1999) The cost of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. Am Econ Rev 89:994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kooten GC, Binkley CS, Delcourt G (1995) Effects of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am J Agric Econ 77:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Veld K, Plantinga A (2005) Carbon sequestration or abatement? The effect of rising carbon prices on the optimal portfolio of greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies. J Environ Econ Manage 50:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Caparrós.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caparrós, A. Delayed carbon sequestration and rising carbon prices. Climatic Change 96, 421–441 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9633-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9633-z

Keywords

Navigation