Abstract
Climate change raises a number of difficult issues concerning the management of scientific uncertainty. Urgent decisions seem to call for quantified probability statements as the basis of rational policy-making. Yet the answers to many important questions such as the likely rate of sea level rise are not easily quantified, and the utilization of any estimates based on ‘collective subjective probability’ necessarily depends on value-laden judgments about burden-of-proof and the distribution of risk. We suggest that there is a need for a new form of risk assessment that is based in, but not limited to, the scientific community, in which rapid but credible processes address the critical questions that we are now facing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baer P, Spash C (2009) Is climate change cost-benefit analysis defensible? A critique of the Stern Report. In Pereira AG, Funtowicz S (eds) Science for policy: New challenges, new opportunities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 229
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1994) The Worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 10:197–207.
Hansen J (2008) Tipping point: Perspective of a climatologist. In: Woods W (ed) State of the wild 2008–2009: a global portrait of wildlife, wildlands, and oceans. Wildlife Conservation Society/Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 6–15
IPCC (2005) Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC fourth assessment report on addressing uncertainties. Technical Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p 4
Moss R, Schneider SH (2000) Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In: Pachauri R, Taniguchi T, Tanaka K (eds) Guidance papers on the cross cutting issues of the third assessment report of the IPCC. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, pp 33–51
Risbey J (2008) The new climate discourse: alarmist or alarming? Global Environ Change 18(1):26–37
Swart R, Bernstein L, Ha-Duong M, Petersen A (2009) Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Clim Change 92:1–2 (this isse)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baer, P., Risbey, J.S. Uncertainty and assessment of the issues posed by urgent climate change. An editorial comment. Climatic Change 92, 31–36 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9529-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9529-3