Adams, D. M. and Haynes, R. W.: 1996, ‘The 1993 timber assessment market model: Structure, projections, and policy simulations, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-368. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,’ Pacific Northwest Research Station. 58 p.
Adams, D. and Latta, G.: 2004, ‘Effects of a forest health thinning program on land and timber values in eastern Oregon,’ J. Forestry
(8), 9–13.Google Scholar
Adams, D., Alig, R., McCarl, B., Winnett, S. and Callaway, J.: 1999, ‘Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests’, Land Economics
(3), 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexeyev, V. A. and Birdsey, R. A. (eds): 1998, ‘Carbon Storage in Forests and Peatlands of Russia’. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-244. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,' Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 137 p.
Alexeyev, V. A., Markov, M. V. and Birdsey, R. A.: 2004, ‘Statistical Data on Forest Fund of Russia and Changing of Forest Productivity in the Second Half of 20th century, St. Petersburg Forest Ecological Center Publishers,’ St. Petersburg, Russia. 272 p.
Alig, R., Lewis, B. and Morris, P.: 1984, ‘Aggregate Timber Supply Analysis. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report RM-GTR-106. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station,’ Ft. Collins, Colo.
Alig, R., Adams, D. and McCarl, B.: 1997, ‘Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agricultural sectors,’ Environmental and Resource Economics
, 259–274.Google Scholar
Alig, R., Zheng, D., Spies, T. and Butler, B.: 2000, ‘Forest cover dynamics in the Pacific Northwest west side: Regional trends and Projections’ Res. Pap. PNW-RP-522. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,' Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p.
Alig, R.: 2003, ‘U.S. landowner behavior, land use and land cover changes, and climate change mitigation’, Silva Fennica
(4), 511–527.Google Scholar
Alig, R., Plantinga, A., Ahn, S., and Kline, J.: 2003, ‘Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050’ Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-587. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 92 p.
Alig, R. and Butler, B.: 2004, ‘Forest cover changes in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050' Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-613, Portland, OR: U.S. Department of agriculture, forest service,' Pacific Northwest Research Station. 106p.
Alig, R., Kline, J., and Lichtenstein: 2004, ‘Urbanization on the U.S. landscape: Looking ahead in the 21st century’, Landscape and Urban Planning
Aksenov, D., Dobrynin, D., Dubinin, M. et al.: 2000, ‘Atlas of Russia's Intact Forest Landscapes, Biodiversity Conservation Center, Greenpeace Russia, International Socio-Ecological union,’ World Resources Institute, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
Birdsey, R., Alig, R., and Adams, D.: 2001, ‘Mitigation options in the forest sector to reduce emissions or enhance sinks of greenhouse gases’ In: Joyce, L. and Birdsey, R., eds., The Impacts of Climate Change on America's Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-59. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service,' Rocky Mountain Research Station, 112–131. Chapter 8.
Caspersen, J., Pacala, S., Jenkins, J., Hurtt, G., Moorcroft, P., and Birdsey, R.: 2000, ‘Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S.’, Forests Science
(5494), 1148–1151.Google Scholar
Conard, S. G., Sukhinin, A. L. Stocks, B. et al.: 2002, ‘Determining effects of area burned and fire severity on carbon cycling and emissions in Siberia’, Climatic Change
(1), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filimonov, B. K., Kukuev, Y. A, Strakhov, V. V., Filipchuk, A. N., Dyakun, F. A., Sdobnova, V. V. and Danilova, S. V.:1995, ‘Forest fund of Russia’ Statistical summary. (survey of January 1, 1993; in Russian).
Harmon, M. E.: 2001, ‘Carbon sequestration in forests: Addressing the scale question,’ Journal of Forestry
(4), 24–29.Google Scholar
Harmon, M. E. and Marks, B.: 2002, ‘Effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon stores in forest stands,’ Canadian Journal of Forest Research
, 863–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R., tech. coord.: 1990, ‘An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1989–2040. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-1995. Ft. Collins, CO., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,’ Pacific Northwest Research Station. 286 p.
Haynes, R., tech. coord.: 2003, ‘An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-560. Portland, OR, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,’ Pacific Northwest Research Station. 254 p.
Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J. L., and Lawrence, K. T.: 1999, ‘The U.S. carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change,’ Science
, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, P. 1999, ‘Long-range outlook for U.S. paper and paperboard demand, technology, and fiber supply-demand equilibria,’ in: Proceedings of the society of American Foresters 1998 National Convention. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters, 330–343.
Kasischke, E. S. Bergen, K. et al., 1999, ‘Satellite imagery gives clear picture of Russia's boreal forest fires’, EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 80
(13), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasischke, E. S. and Bruhwiler, L. M.: 2002, ‘Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and methane from boreal forest fires in 1998,’ Journal of Geophysical Research
108 (D1) 8146, doi:10.1029/2001JD000461.
Kauppi, P., Sedjo, R., Apps, M., Cerri, C., Fujimori, T., Janzen, H., Krankina, O., Makundi, W., Marland, G., Masera, O., Nabuurs, G.-J., Razali, W. and Ravindranath, N.H.: 2001, ‘Technical and economic potential of options to enhance, Maintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and geo-engineering’ in: Climate change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. (IPCC). Pp. 301–343.
Krankina, O. N., Fiorella, M., Cohen, W., and Treyfeld, R. F.: 1998, ‘The use of Russian forest inventory data for carbon budgeting and for developing carbon offset strategies’ World Resource Review
(1), 52–66.Google Scholar
Krankina, O. N., Treyfeld, R. F., Harmon, M. E., Spycher, G., and Povarov, E. D.: 2001, Coarse woody debris in the forests of St. Petersburg region, Russia, Ecol. Bull
, 93–104.Google Scholar
Krankina, O. N., Harmon, M. E., Cohen, W. B., et al. 2004a, ‘Carbon stores, sinks, and sources in forests of northwestern Russia: Can we reconcile forest inventories with remote sensing results?’ Climatic Change
(2–3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krankina, O. N., Bergen, K. M., Sun, G., Masek, J. G., Shugart, H. H., Kharuk, V., Kasischke, E., Cohen, W. B., Oetter, D. R. and Duane, M. V.: 2004b, Northern Eurasia: Remote sensing of boreal forest in selected regions in: G. Gutman et al. (eds.), Land Change Science: Observing, Monitoring, and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth's Surface. Series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, Vol. 6. Springer E-book, pp.123–138.
Kukuev, Y. A., Krankina, O. N., and Harmon, M. E.: 1997, ‘The forest inventory system in Russia,’ Journal of Forestry
(9), 15–20.Google Scholar
Kurz, W. A. and Apps, M. J.: 1999, A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector.Ecological Application
(2): 526–547.Google Scholar
McCarl, B., Adams, D., Alig, R., Burton, D. and Chen, C.: 2000. Effects of global climate change on the U.S. forest sector: response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator. Climate Research
: 195–205.Google Scholar
Mills, J. and Kincaid, J.:1992, ‘The aggregate timberland analysis system – ATLAS: A comprehensive timber projection model,’ Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-281. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 160p.
Murray, B., Prisley, S., Birdsey, R., and Sampson, N.: 2000, Carbon sinks in the kyoto protocol: Potential relevance for U.S. forests. Journal of Forestry
: 6–11.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. and Birdsey, R.:1993, ‘Carbon fluxes resulting from U.S. private timberland management’, Climatic Change
: 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvidenko, A. and Nilsson, S.: 2003, A synthesis of the impact of Russian forests on the global carbon budget for 1961–1998. Tellus B.
Smith, W. B., Vissage, J., Sheffield, R. and Darr, D.: 2001, ‘Forest resources of the United States, 1997' Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-219. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 190 p.
Treyfeld, R. F., Kobak, K. I. and Grjazkin A.V.: 2003, ‘The dynamic of carbon fund in a live biomass of the Leningrad region forest,’ (eds), in Grjaznov, S. E., Kuzminykh, Y. V., Krankina, O. N., and Belgavskaya, M. V., Dynamics of Carbon Store in the Forest of the Northwest: Ecology, Economics and Politics, Works of the International Science and Technology Conference, Forest Technical Academy, 2003, St. Petersburg, Russia St. Petersburg Technical Academy, 2003, pp. 21–38.
Turner D. P., Koerper G. J., Harmon M. E, and Lee, J.: 1995, ‘A carbon budget for forests of the conterminous United States,’ Ecological Applications
: 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Global Change Research Program.: 2000, ‘Our changing planet’, A Report by the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources of the National Science and Technology Council A Supplement to the President's Fiscal Year 2000 Budget.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)/FAO. 2000. Forest resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand (industrialized temperature/boreal countries). New York, USA and Geneva, Switzerland, UN.
Waggoner, P. E.: 1994, ‘How much land can ten billion people spare for nature ? Council for Agricultural Science and Technology,’ Task Force Report No. 121. Ames, IA, 64pp.