Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Generational Divide in Support for Environmental Policies: European Evidence

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines age variations in support for environmental protection policies that affect climate change using a sample of over 14,000 respondents to a 1999 Eurobarometer survey. There is a steady decline with age in whether respondents are willing to incur higher gasoline prices to protect the environment. This relationship remains after controlling for socioeconomic characteristics. There are age-related differences in information about environmental risks, information sources about the environment, perceived health risks from climate change, and degree of worry about climate change. However, taking these factors into account does not eliminate the age variation in willingness to pay more for gasoline to protect the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J.: 1995, Risk, University College London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldy, J. E., Barrett, S. and Stavins, R. N.: 2003, ‘Thirteen plus one: A comparison of global climate policy architectures’, Climate Policy 3, 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S.: 2003, Environment and State Craft, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. and Fovell, R. G.: 1999, ‘Public perceptions of climate change: A “willingness to pay” assessment’, Climatic Change 41(3–4), 413–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. and Read, D.: 1994, ‘What do people know about global climate change?: 1. Mental models’, Risk Analysis 14(6), 959–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R., Flores, N. and Meade, N.: 2001, ‘Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence’, Environmental and Resource Economics 19, 173–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H. and Gallup, A. M.: 1993, ‘Results of the health of the planet survey’, Environment 35(9), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and Furby, L.: 1988, ‘Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 147–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J. and Viscusi, W. K.: 2004, ‘Paying for climate change policies in Europe’, Harvard Law School Olin discussion paper 503.

  • Israel, D. K.: 2004, ‘International support for environmental protection’, Environment and Development Economics, 9 (6), 781–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, D. K. and Levinson, A.: 2004, ‘Willingness to pay for environmental quality: Testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature’, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 31(1), article 2.

  • Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.: 1992, ‘Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W.: 1991a, ‘Public understanding of global warming’, Society and Natural Resources 4(4), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W.: 1991b, ‘Lay perspectives on global climate change’, Global Environmental Change 1(3), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W.: 1997, ‘How the public views climate change’, Environment 39(9), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W. and Craig, P.: 1993, ‘European thinking on global climate change’, Environment 35(3), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R.: 1991, ‘Climate change perceptions and energy-use decisions in northern Sweden’, Environmental Change 1, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G. and Fischhoff, B.: 1994, ‘What do people know about global climate change?: 2. Survey studies of educated lay people’, Risk Analysis 14 (6), 971–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. and Read, N. L.: 2004, ‘Time discounting over the lifespan’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 94, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.: 1997, ‘The cost of combating global warming: Facing the tradeoffs’, Foreign Affairs 76(6), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. B., and Wiener, J. B.: 2003, Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, The AEI Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Amsberg, J.: 1995, ‘Excessive environmental risks: An intergenerational market failure’, European Economic Review 39 (8), 1447–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joni Hersch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hersch, J., Viscusi, W.K. The Generational Divide in Support for Environmental Policies: European Evidence. Climatic Change 77, 121–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9074-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9074-x

Keywords

Navigation