Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon Accounting and Cost Estimation in Forestry Projects Using CO2Fix V.3

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon and financial accounting of projects in the Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry sector is a topic of hot debate. Large uncertainty remains concerning the carbon dynamics, the way they should be accounted and the cost efficiency of the projects. Part of the uncertainty can be alleviated by standardisation and transparency of reporting methods. For this reason we further developed CO2FIX, a forest ecosystem carbon model, with modules for carbon and financial accounting. The model is applied to four cases: 1) Joint implementation afforestation project in Romania, 2) Forest management project in Central Europe, 3) Reduced impact logging possibly under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in the future, and 4) Afforestation with native species under the Clean Development Mechanism. The results show the wide applicability of CO2FIX, from degrading grasslands as baseline cases to multiple cohort forest ecosystems. Also the results show that Forest Management in the European case can generate considerable amounts of carbon emission reductions. Further, the results show that although reduced impact logging is not yet an allowed option under the Clean Development Mechanism, it shows promising results in that it is 1) very cost effective, 2) seems to be able to generate intermediate amounts of credits and 3) seems to us as a project type that is not prone to leakage issues. These results are yet another indication to seriously consider reduced impact logging as an eligible measure under the CDM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boer, R.: 2001, ‘Economic assessment of mitigation options for enhancing and maintaining carbon sink capacity in Indonesia’, Mit. Adap. Stra. Gl. Ch. 6, 257–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boscolo, M., Vincent, J. R. et al.: 1998, ‘Discounting costs and benefits in carbon sequestration projects’, Dev. Discuss. Pap. 638, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Phillips, H. et al.: 2002, ‘Romania Afforestation of Degraded Agricultural Land Project’, Baseline Study, Emission Reductions Projection and Monitoring Plans, Prototype Carbon Fund.

  • Camacho, M. and Finegan, B.: 1997, ‘Efectos del aprovechamiento forestal y el tratamiento silvicultural en un bosque húmedo del noreste de Costa Rica’, CATIE-Serie Técnica. Informe técnico 295, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. M., Lashof, D. A. et al.: 2000, ‘Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry’, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Global Change 5, 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurgiu, V., Decei, J. et al. (eds.): 1973, Biometria Arborilor Si Arboretelor Din Romania-Table Dendrometrice-Bucuresti.

  • Hänninen, R.: 2002, Finnish Forest Sector Economic Outlook 2002–2003, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, METLA, p. 57.

  • Hoen, H. F. and Solberg, B.: 1995, ‘Valuation of global afforestation programs for carbon mitigation’ by Sten Nilsson, Clim. Change 30, 259–266 [Editorial Comment].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knippers, T., van Putten, B., Nabuurs, G. J., and van Esch, P. W.: submitted, ‘Quantifying uncertainties in carbon sequestration estimates in a tropical and temperate forest’, Forest Ecol. Manage.

  • Masera, O. R., Garza-Caligaris, J. F. et al.: 2003, ‘Modelling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: The CO2FIX V.2 approach’, Ecol. Model. 164, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura Costa, P. and Wilson, C.: 2000, ‘An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and Sequestration – Description and applications in forestry’, Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Global Change 5, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs, G., Garza-Caligaris, J. F., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Lapvetelainen, T., Liski, J., Masera, O., Mohren, G. M. J., Olgin, M., Pussinen, A., and Schelhaas, M. J.: 2002, CO 2 FIX V2.0. Manual of a model for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems and wood products, Wageningen, Alterra, Report 445, p. 44.

  • Nabuurs, G. J. and Mohren, G. M. J.: 1993, ‘Carbon in Dutch forest ecosystems’, Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 41(4), 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, H.: 2002, Afforestation of Degraded Agricultural Land in Romania – Technical, Financial and Environmental Assessment Report, Prototype Carbon Fund, World Bank, Washington, p. 44.

  • SBB: 2000, Normenboek staatsbosbeheer 2000–2001, Driebergen, Staatsbosbeheer, Afdeling Personeel en Bedrijf, Sectie Bedrijfsbeleid en Juridische Zaken.

  • Schelhaas, M. J., van Esch, P. W., Groen, T. A., de Jong, B. H. J., Kanninen, M., Liski, J., Masera, O., Mohren, G. M. J., Nabuurs, G. J., Palosuo, T., Pedroni, L., Vallejo, A., and Vilén, T.: 2004, CO 2 FIX V 3.1 – A Modelling Framework for Quantifying Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems, Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-rapport 1068, p. 122.

  • UNFCCC: 1997, The Kyoto Protocol, UNEP Information Unit for Conventions.

  • UNFCCC: 2001, Review of the Implementation of Commitments and of Other Provisions of the Convention, Preparations for the First Session of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (Decision 8/CP.4), Decision 5/CP.6, Implementation of the Buenos Aires Plan of Action, United Nations Office, Geneva, p. 14.

  • UNFCCC: 2002a, Views from Parties on Issues Related to Modalities for the Inclusion of Afforestation and Reforestation Project Activities Under the Clean Development Mechanism in the First Commitment Period, Submissions from Parties, United Nations Office, Geneva, p. 58.

  • UNFCCC: 2002b, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakech from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, Conference of the Parties (CoP7), United Nations Office, Marrakech.

  • UNFCCC: 2003, Modalities and Procedures for Afforestation and Reforestation Project Activities under the Clean Development Mechanism in the First Commitment Period of the Kyoto Protocol (Decision 19/CP.9)" (FCCC/CP/2003/6/Add.2).

  • UNFCCC: 2004, Clean Development Mechanism Guidelines for Completing the Project Design Document for A/R (CDM-AR-NBM), the Proposed New Methodology for A/R: Baseline (CDM-AR-NBM), and the Proposed New Methodology for A/R: Monitoring (CDM_AR_NMM).

  • Van Vliet, O. P. R., Faaij, A. P. C., and Dieperink, C.: 2003, ‘Forestry projects under the clean development mechanism?’, Clim. Change 61, 123–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Groen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groen, T., Nabuurs, G.J. & Schelhaas, M.J. Carbon Accounting and Cost Estimation in Forestry Projects Using CO2Fix V.3. Climatic Change 74, 269–288 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-1827-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-1827-z

Keywords

Navigation