Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Climatic Variability on US Irrigation Adoption

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature underscoring the importance of climatic variance by developing a framework for incorporating the means and tails of the distributions of rainfall and temperature into empirical models of agricultural production. The methodology is applied to estimate the impact of climate change on the discrete choice decision to adopt irrigation since it is an important adaptation to climate change. We develop a discrete choice model for the decision to install irrigation capacity that captures the effects of both climate means and extremes. Climatic means and frequencies of climatic events in the upper tails of the temperature and precipitation distributions are used to estimate the parameters of a normal distribution for temperature and a Weibull distribution for precipitation. Using estimates from a probit model, we examine the independent effects of changing climatic mean and variance on the probability of adopting irrigation. Increasing the mean temperature, holding variance constant, shifts the entire distribution toward warmer temperatures—increasing the frequency of extreme temperatures. For precipitation, the specification captures the separate effects of mean rainfall, frequency of rainfall, and frequency of extreme events. The results show that the tails of the temperature and precipitation distributions, not the means, are the dominant climatic determinants in irrigation adoption. The results also show that water availability, soil characteristics, farm size and operator demographics are important determinants of irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, Alaa: 1998, ‘Nonparametric spatial rainfall characterization using adaptive kernel estimation’, J. Geogr. Inform. Decision Anal. 2(2), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census: 1996. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey (1994), 1992 Census of Agriculture, Related Surveys AC92-RS-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC.

  • Chambers, R. G. and Just, R. E.: 1989, ‘Estimating multioutput technologies’, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71, 980–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, M. G.: 1997, ‘The welfare bias from omitting climatic variability in economic studies of global warming’, J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33, 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, B. L. and Segerson, K.: 1999, ‘Impacts of increased climate variability on the profitability of midwest agriculture’, J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 31(3), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J., Selker, J. and Grant, G. E.: 1988, ‘Evaluation of probability density functions in precipitation models for the Pacific Northwest’, J. Am. Water Resources Assoc. 34(3), 617–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service: 1996, ERS’s New ARMS Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/ARMS.

  • Economic Research Service: 2003, ‘Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, Agricultural Handbook No. AH722,’ U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, P., Hellerstein, D. and Hansen, L.: 1999, ‘Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits and the Targeting of Conservation Programs: The Case of the CRP’, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William: 1998, LIMDEP, Version 7.0 Users Manual, Econometric Software Inc., Plainview, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. M., Crosson, P.: 1995, ‘Implications of Climate change for U.S. Agriculture’, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 734–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, M. T.: 1993, ‘Pricing subsidies and economic efficiency: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’, J. Law Econ. 36 (April), 205–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. and Brown, B. G.: 1992, ‘Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages’, Clim. Change 21, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandrowski, J. and Schimmelpfennig, D.: 1999, ‘Economic implications of climate change for U.S. Agriculture Assessing Recent Evidence’, Land Econ. 75(1), 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S. J.: 1998, Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Advanced Quantitative Techniques for the Social Sciences, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Mearns, L. O., Rosenzweig, C. and Goldberg, R.: 1996, ‘The effect of changes in daily and interannual climatic variability on CERES-Wheat: A sensitivity study’, Clim. Change 32, 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. and Shaw, D. G.: 1994, ‘The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis’, Am. Econ. Rev. 84(4), 753–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. and Shaw, D. G.: 1999, ‘The impact of climate variation on US agriculture’, in Mendelsohn, R. and Neumann, J. E. (eds.), The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. R. and Dinar, A.: 1995, ‘Water and land as quantity-rationed inputs in California agriculture: Empirical tests and water policy implications’, Land Econ. 71(4), 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service: 1997, Agriculture Statistics 1997, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agstats.htm.

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service: 1998a, Agriculture Prices 1997 Summary. Pr1-3 (98), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service: 1998b, Agriculture Statistics 1998, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agstats.htm.

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service: 1999, 1997 Census of Agriculture, Vol. 1, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Climatic Data Center: 1997, Data Documentation for TY 3220 Data Set: Summary of the Month Cooperative, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Asheville, NC, http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/ol/documentlibrary/datasets.html#TD3220.

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service: 1995, State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database: Data Use Information, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1492, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/pdf/statsgo_db.pdf.

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service: 1999, 1997 National Resources Inventory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/NRI/1997/intro.html.

  • Negri, D. H. and Brooks, D. H.: 1990, ‘Determinants of irrigation technology choice’, Western J. Agric. Econ. 15(2), 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Yang, X. B., Epstein, P. R. and Chivian, E.: 2000, ‘Climate change and U.S. agriculture: The impacts of warming and extreme weather events on productivity, plant diseases, and pests’, Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School.

  • Runge, E. C. A.: 1968, ‘Effects of rainfall and temperature interactions during the growing season on corn yield’, Agron. J. 60(5), 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelpfennig, D.: 1996, ‘Uncertainty in economic models of climate change impacts’, Clim. Change 33, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, C. R., Pope, R. and Nash, E.: 1984, ‘Allocatable fixed inputs and jointness in agricultural production: Implications for economics modeling’, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66,72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solley, W. B., Pierce, R. R. and Perlman, H. A.: 1998, ‘Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995,’ U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, Circular 1200.

  • Whittaker, G. and Scott, D. W.: 1999, ‘Nonparametric regression for analysis of complex surveys and geographic visualization’, Indian J. Stat. 61 (Series B, Pt. 1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald H. Negri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Negri, D.H., Gollehon, N.R. & Aillery, M.P. The Effects of Climatic Variability on US Irrigation Adoption. Climatic Change 69, 299–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1817-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1817-6

Keywords

Navigation