Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of an endothelial roll preparation for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty by a cornea bank using “no touch” dissection technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) selectively replaces the damaged posterior part of the cornea. However, the DMEK technique relies on a manually-performed dissection that is time-consuming, requires training and presents a potential risk of endothelial graft damages leading to surgery postponement when performed by surgeons in the operative room. To validate precut corneal tissue preparation for DMEK provided by a cornea bank in order to supply a quality and security precut endothelial tissue. The protocol was a technology transfer from the Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS) to Lyon Cornea Bank, after formation in NIIOS to the DMEK “no touch” dissection technique. The technique has been validated in selected conditions (materials, microscope) and after a learning curve, cornea bank technicians prepared endothelial tissue for DMEK. Endothelial cells densities (ECD) were evaluated before and after preparation, after storage and transport to the surgery room. Microbiological and histological controls have been done. Twenty corneas were manually dissected; 18 without tears. Nineteen endothelial grafts formed a double roll. The ECD loss after cutting was 3.3 % (n = 19). After transportation 7 days later, we found an ECD loss of 25 % (n = 12). Three days after cutting and transportation, we found 2.1 % of ECD loss (n = 7). Histology found an endothelial cells monolayer lying on Descemet membrane. The mean thickness was 12 ± 2.2 µm (n = 4). No microbial contamination was found (n = 19). Endothelial roll stability has been validated at 3 days in our cornea bank. Cornea bank technicians trained can deliver to surgeons an ECD controlled, safety and ready to use endothelial tissue, for DMEK by “no touch” technique, allowing time saving, quality and security for surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW (2012) Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119(3):536–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P et al (2008) Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 115(9):1525–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayyoud T, Röck D, Hofmann J et al (2012) Precut technique for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty, preparation and storage in organ culture. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 229(6):621–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann T, Brockmann C, Maier A-K et al (2014) Clinicopathology of graft detachment after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol (Cph) 92(7):e556–e561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busin M, Scorcia V, Patel AK et al (2011) Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 95(8):1172–1173 (author reply 1173)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GRJ (2009) Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK—the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20(4):299–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmann AS, Goins KM, Reed C et al (2008) Eye bank survey of surgeons using precut donor tissue for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 27(6):634–639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krabcova I, Studeny P, Jirsova K (2011) Endothelial cell density before and after the preparation of corneal lamellae for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim. Cornea 30(12):1436–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krabcova I, Studeny P, Jirsova K (2013) Endothelial quality of pre-cut posterior corneal lamellae for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S): two-year outcome of manual preparation in an ocular tissue bank. Cell Tissue Bank 14(2):325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse FE, Schrehardt US, Tourtas T (2014) Optimizing outcomes with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(4):325–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L et al (2008) Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(9):1578–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lie JT, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Ham L et al (2010) More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 94(9):1265–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melles GRJ (2006) Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 25(8):879–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraine M (2008) Endothelial keratoplasty. J Fr Ophtalmol 31(9):907–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraine M, Gueudry J, He Z et al (2013) Novel technique for the preparation of corneal grafts for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 156(5):851–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM et al (2009) Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 116(12):2361–2368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauen MP, Goins KM, Sutphin JE et al (2012) Impact of eye bank lamellar tissue cutting for endothelial keratoplasty on bacterial and fungal corneoscleral donor rim cultures after corneal transplantation. Cornea 31(4):376–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO et al (2012) Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119(3):528–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T et al (2013) Reproducibility of graft preparations in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 120(9):1769–1777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkman LR, Price FW, Price MO (2014) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation: navigating challenges and improving efficiency. Cornea 33(3):319–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES et al (2009) Precut tissue for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 116(2):248–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thuret G, Manissolle C, Campos-Guyotat L et al (2005) Animal compound-free medium and poloxamer for human corneal organ culture and deswelling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(3):816–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venzano D, Pagani P, Randazzo N et al (2010) Descemet membrane air-bubble separation in donor corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(12):2022–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazoe K, Shinozaki N, Shimazaki J (2013) Influence of the precutting and overseas transportation of corneal grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty on donor endothelial cell loss. Cornea 32(6):741–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoeruek E, Hofmann J, Bartz-Schmidt K-U (2013) Comparison of swollen and dextran deswollen organ-cultured corneas for Descemet membrane dissection preparation: histological and ultrastructural findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(13):8036–8040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, Rife L, Yiu S et al (2006) Technique for preparation of the corneal endothelium-Descemet membrane complex for transplantation. Cornea 25(6):705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Sophie Marty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Viridiana Kocaba and Celine Auxenfans are co-authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marty, AS., Burillon, C., Desanlis, A. et al. Validation of an endothelial roll preparation for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty by a cornea bank using “no touch” dissection technique. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 225–232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9544-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9544-y

Keywords

Navigation