Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

MDCT evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: What should radiologists know?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an important tool for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome and stable angina, coronary CT angiography has been increasingly being performed in patients presenting with atypical chest pain. In order to help treating patients more efficiently, it is crucial for radiologists to have a comprehensive understanding about mechanisms and clinical aspects as well as CT findings of coronary atherosclerosis per se. A thorough understanding and optimal performance of coronary CT angiography may lead to reduction of unjustified downstream testing. This article provides a clinical and radiological overview of coronary atherosclerosis, and a practical guideline about how to interpret degree of stenosis on coronary CT angiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbate A, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Agostoni P et al (2007) Recurrent angina after coronary revascularization: a clinical challenge. Eur Heart J 28(9):1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(21):1724–1732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Dunning AM et al (2011) Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(5):510–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Wang J et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: the effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective. Acta Radiol 51(7):727–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Libby P (2013) Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 368(21):2004–2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hattori K, Ozaki Y, Ismail TF et al (2012) Impact of statin therapy on plaque characteristics as assessed by serial OCT, grayscale and integrated backscatter-IVUS. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5(2):169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Libby P (2005) The forgotten majority: unfinished business in cardiovascular risk reduction. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(7):1225–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nidorf SM, Eikelboom JW, Budgeon CA et al (2013) Low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(4):404–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J (2011) Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(Suppl 1):9–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann U, Brady TJ, Muller J (2003) Cardiology patient page. Use of new imaging techniques to screen for coronary artery disease. Circulation 108(8):e50–e53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST et al (2007) Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(18):1860–1870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong ND, Budoff MJ, Pio J et al (2002) Coronary calcium and cardiovascular event risk: evaluation by age- and sex-specific quartiles. Am Heart J 143(3):456–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Budoff MJ, Gul KM (2008) Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag 4(2):315–324

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ et al (1999) Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 74(3):243–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee HY, Song IS, Yoo SM et al (2010) Can the extent of epicardial adipose tissue thickness or the presence of descending thoracic aortic calcification predict significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with a zero coronary calcium score on multi-detector CT? Atherosclerosis 212(2):495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL et al (2009) Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 53(4):345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meijs MF, Meijboom WB, Prokop M et al (2009) Is there a role for CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic angina? Effect of coronary calcium score on identification of stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(8):847–854

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score reference values. http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org/Calcium/input.aspx. Cited 16 Feb 2013

  21. Muhlenbruch G, Klotz E, Wildberger JE et al (2007) The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo. Eur Radiol 17(2):321–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Budoff MJ, Hokanson JE, Nasir K et al (2010) Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(12):1229–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK (2003) Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT-assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods. Radiology 227(3):795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Techasith T, Cury RC (2011) Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(8):905–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308(12):1237–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sundaram B, Patel S, Agarwal P et al (2009) Anatomy and terminology for the interpretation and reporting of cardiac MDCT: part 2, CT angiography, cardiac function assessment, and noncoronary and extracardiac findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3):584–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert, Consensus D, Mark DB, Berman DS et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(23):2663–2699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(2):122–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kerl JM, Hofmann LK, Thilo C et al (2007) Coronary CTA: image acquisition and interpretation. J Thorac Imaging 22(1):22–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferencik M, Ropers D, Abbara S et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology 243(3):696–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li M, Zhang J, Pan J et al (2013) Obstructive coronary artery disease: reverse attenuation gradient sign at CT indicates distal retrograde flow—a useful sign for differentiating chronic total occlusion from subtotal occlusion. Radiology 266(3):766–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tacelli N, Remy-Jardin M, Flohr T et al (2010) Dual-source chest CT angiography with high temporal resolution and high pitch modes: evaluation of image quality in 140 patients. Eur Radiol 20(5):1188–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology 260(2):390–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(12):1161–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M et al (2007) Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(4):319–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(1):49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Otsuka K, Fukuda S, Tanaka A et al (2013) Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(4):448–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP et al (2000) Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20(5):1262–1275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ et al (2009) Quantification and characterization of obstructive coronary plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(2):186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Halliburton SS, Schoenhagen P, Nair A et al (2006) Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: a high-resolution, multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused, human ex vivo coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis 17(6):553–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2005) Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 15(7):1426–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M et al (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(4):328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248(1):254–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Layritz C et al (2013) Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose < 0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 23(3):597–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Sungnam, Korea

    Hye Rin Kim, Seung Min Yoo & Ji Young Rho

  2. Smile Radiologic Clinic, Seoul, Korea

    Hwa Yeon Lee

  3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Charles S. White

Authors
  1. Hye Rin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seung Min Yoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji Young Rho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hwa Yeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles S. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Min Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H.R., Yoo, S.M., Rho, J.Y. et al. MDCT evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: What should radiologists know?. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30 (Suppl 1), 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0411-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0411-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation