Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding rural–urban differences in risk factors for breast cancer in an Indian population

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although cancer registry data indicate that there are large differences in breast cancer (BC) rates between rural and urban regions of India, the reasons for these differences are not well understood.

Methods

We conducted a hospital based case–control study (1,637 breast cancer cases; 1,515 visitor controls) in Mumbai, India, during the years 2009–2013. Extensive questionnaire data, anthropometry measurement and blood samples were collected on all participants. Using logistic regression models, we estimated risk based on odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for various reproductive and anthropometric measures, stratified by rural–urban status depending upon residence in first 20 years of life.

Results

Waist-to-hip ratio of ≥0.95 compared to ratio ≤0.84 was strongly associated with risk of BC in both rural and urban populations (ORurban = 4.10, 95 % CI 3.03–5.56; ORrural = 3.01, 95 % CI 1.85–4.90). First full-term pregnancy after the age of 25 compared to first full-term pregnancy below 20 years of age was associated with risk of BC in both urban and rural women (ORurban = 1.78, 95 % CI 1.32–2.41; ORrural = 2.24, 95 % CI 1.13–4.43). The prevalence of age at first full-term pregnancy was significantly lower in rural (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 19.39 years) versus urban women (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 22.62 years), whereas mean waist circumference was much higher in urban women (82.13 cm) compared to rural women (79.26 cm). We did not observe any association between breast feeding and risk of BC.

Conclusions

Differences in the prevalence of central adiposity and age at first full-term pregnancy between rural and urban women from India may explain some differences in breast cancer rates between these two populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N et al (2012) Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13:790–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagrani R, Budukh A, Koyande S et al (2014) Rural urban differences in breast cancer in India. Indian J Cancer 51:277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey S, Soliman AS, Hablas A et al (2010) Urban–rural differences in breast cancer incidence in Egypt (1999–2006). The Breast 19:417–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathew A, Gajalakshmi V, Rajan B et al (2009) Physical activity levels among urban and rural women in south India and the risk of breast cancer: a case–control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 18:368–376. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832e1c46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Okasha M, McCarron P, Gunnell D, Smith GD (2003) Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78:223–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch E, Bogado M, Araya F et al (2008) Impact of parity on anthropometric measures of obesity controlling by multiple confounders: a cross-sectional study in Chilean women. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:461–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. StataCorp (2011) Stata statistical software. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma H, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Ursin G (2006) Hormone-related risk factors for breast cancer in women under age 50 years by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: results from a case–control and a case–case comparison. Breast Cancer Res 8:R39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ursin G, Bernstein L, Lord SJ et al (2005) Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology. Br J Cancer 93:364–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrieu N, Prevost T, Rohan TE et al (2000) Variation in the interaction between familial and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer according to age, menopausal status, and degree of familiality. Int J Epidemiol 29:214–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SH, Akuete K, Fulton J et al (2003) An increased risk of breast cancer after delayed first parity. Am J Surg 186:409–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG et al (2002) Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 346:2025–2032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A et al (2012) Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 156:635–648

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipworth L, Bailey LR, Trichopoulos D (2000) History of breast-feeding in relation to breast cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:302–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang L, Jacobsen KH (2008) A systematic review of the association between breastfeeding and breast cancer. J Womens Health 17:1635–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagata C, Mizoue T, Tanaka K et al (2012) Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiologic evidence among the Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2008) National family health survey india (NFHS-3): 2005–06. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Maharashtra, India

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gajalakshmi V, Mathew A, Brennan P et al (2009) Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk in India: a multicenter case–control study. Int J Cancer 125:662–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang Y, Zhang X, Li W et al (2014) A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control 25:227–236. doi:10.1007/s10552-013-0325-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braüner CM, Overvad K, Tjønneland A, Attermann J (2013) Induced abortion and breast cancer among parous women: a Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:700–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P et al (2008) Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study. Contraception 77:391–396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ammon Avalos L, Galindo C, Li D-K (2012) A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 94:417–423. doi:10.1002/bdra.23014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reeves GK, Kan S-W, Key T et al (2006) Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 119:1741–1745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Paoletti X, Clavel-Chapelon F (2003) Induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study. Int J Cancer 106:270–276. doi:10.1002/ijc.11203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCourt HJ, Hunter SJ, Cardwell CR et al (2013) Adiponectin multimers, body weight and markers of cardiovascular risk in adolescence: Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Int J Obes 37:1247–1253. doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deepa R, Sandeep S, Mohan V (2006) Abdominal obesity, visceral fat and type 2 diabetes-“asian indian phenotype.” In: Type 2 diabetes South Asians epidemiology, risk factors and prevention. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, pp 138–152

  29. Misra A, Khurana L (2011) Obesity-related non-communicable diseases: South Asians vs White Caucasians. Int J Obes 35:167–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harris HR, Willett WC, Terry KL, Michels KB (2011) Body fat distribution and risk of premenopausal breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study II. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:273–278. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Connolly BS, Barnett C, Vogt KN et al (2002) A meta-analysis of published literature on waist-to-hip ratio and risk of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer 44:127–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng C-C, Pike MC (2007) Body size, hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer in Asian-American women. Int J Cancer 120:844–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lahmann PH, Hoffmann K, Allen N et al (2004) Body size and breast cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer 111:762–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Boggs DA et al (2007) A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1795–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Enas EA, Mohan V, Deepa M et al (2007) The metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia among Asian Indians: a population with high rates of diabetes and premature coronary artery disease. J Cardiometab Syndr 2:267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shu X-O, Jin F, Dai Q et al (2001) Association of body size and fat distribution with risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer 94:449–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Misra A, Shrivastava U (2013) Obesity and dyslipidemia in South Asians. Nutrients 5:2708–2733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Opdahl S, Nilsen TIL, Romundstad PR et al (2008) Association of size at birth with adolescent hormone levels, body size and age at menarche: relevance for breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 99:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by International Agency for Research on Cancer and Department of Biotechnology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Dikshit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nil.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagrani, R., Mhatre, S., Boffetta, P. et al. Understanding rural–urban differences in risk factors for breast cancer in an Indian population. Cancer Causes Control 27, 199–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0697-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0697-y

Keywords

Navigation