Abstract
Purpose
Although cancer registry data indicate that there are large differences in breast cancer (BC) rates between rural and urban regions of India, the reasons for these differences are not well understood.
Methods
We conducted a hospital based case–control study (1,637 breast cancer cases; 1,515 visitor controls) in Mumbai, India, during the years 2009–2013. Extensive questionnaire data, anthropometry measurement and blood samples were collected on all participants. Using logistic regression models, we estimated risk based on odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for various reproductive and anthropometric measures, stratified by rural–urban status depending upon residence in first 20 years of life.
Results
Waist-to-hip ratio of ≥0.95 compared to ratio ≤0.84 was strongly associated with risk of BC in both rural and urban populations (ORurban = 4.10, 95 % CI 3.03–5.56; ORrural = 3.01, 95 % CI 1.85–4.90). First full-term pregnancy after the age of 25 compared to first full-term pregnancy below 20 years of age was associated with risk of BC in both urban and rural women (ORurban = 1.78, 95 % CI 1.32–2.41; ORrural = 2.24, 95 % CI 1.13–4.43). The prevalence of age at first full-term pregnancy was significantly lower in rural (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 19.39 years) versus urban women (mean age at first full-term pregnancy = 22.62 years), whereas mean waist circumference was much higher in urban women (82.13 cm) compared to rural women (79.26 cm). We did not observe any association between breast feeding and risk of BC.
Conclusions
Differences in the prevalence of central adiposity and age at first full-term pregnancy between rural and urban women from India may explain some differences in breast cancer rates between these two populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90
Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N et al (2012) Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13:790–801
Nagrani R, Budukh A, Koyande S et al (2014) Rural urban differences in breast cancer in India. Indian J Cancer 51:277–281
Dey S, Soliman AS, Hablas A et al (2010) Urban–rural differences in breast cancer incidence in Egypt (1999–2006). The Breast 19:417–423
Mathew A, Gajalakshmi V, Rajan B et al (2009) Physical activity levels among urban and rural women in south India and the risk of breast cancer: a case–control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 18:368–376. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32832e1c46
Okasha M, McCarron P, Gunnell D, Smith GD (2003) Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 78:223–276
Koch E, Bogado M, Araya F et al (2008) Impact of parity on anthropometric measures of obesity controlling by multiple confounders: a cross-sectional study in Chilean women. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:461–470
World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva
StataCorp (2011) Stata statistical software. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX
Ma H, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Ursin G (2006) Hormone-related risk factors for breast cancer in women under age 50 years by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: results from a case–control and a case–case comparison. Breast Cancer Res 8:R39
Ursin G, Bernstein L, Lord SJ et al (2005) Reproductive factors and subtypes of breast cancer defined by hormone receptor and histology. Br J Cancer 93:364–371
Andrieu N, Prevost T, Rohan TE et al (2000) Variation in the interaction between familial and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer according to age, menopausal status, and degree of familiality. Int J Epidemiol 29:214–223
Lee SH, Akuete K, Fulton J et al (2003) An increased risk of breast cancer after delayed first parity. Am J Surg 186:409–412
Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG et al (2002) Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 346:2025–2032
Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A et al (2012) Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 156:635–648
Lipworth L, Bailey LR, Trichopoulos D (2000) History of breast-feeding in relation to breast cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:302–312
Yang L, Jacobsen KH (2008) A systematic review of the association between breastfeeding and breast cancer. J Womens Health 17:1635–1645
Nagata C, Mizoue T, Tanaka K et al (2012) Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiologic evidence among the Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42:124–130
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2008) National family health survey india (NFHS-3): 2005–06. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Maharashtra, India
Gajalakshmi V, Mathew A, Brennan P et al (2009) Breastfeeding and breast cancer risk in India: a multicenter case–control study. Int J Cancer 125:662–665
Huang Y, Zhang X, Li W et al (2014) A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control 25:227–236. doi:10.1007/s10552-013-0325-7
Braüner CM, Overvad K, Tjønneland A, Attermann J (2013) Induced abortion and breast cancer among parous women: a Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:700–705
Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P et al (2008) Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study. Contraception 77:391–396
Ammon Avalos L, Galindo C, Li D-K (2012) A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 94:417–423. doi:10.1002/bdra.23014
Reeves GK, Kan S-W, Key T et al (2006) Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 119:1741–1745
Paoletti X, Clavel-Chapelon F (2003) Induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study. Int J Cancer 106:270–276. doi:10.1002/ijc.11203
McCourt HJ, Hunter SJ, Cardwell CR et al (2013) Adiponectin multimers, body weight and markers of cardiovascular risk in adolescence: Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Int J Obes 37:1247–1253. doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.214
Deepa R, Sandeep S, Mohan V (2006) Abdominal obesity, visceral fat and type 2 diabetes-“asian indian phenotype.” In: Type 2 diabetes South Asians epidemiology, risk factors and prevention. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, pp 138–152
Misra A, Khurana L (2011) Obesity-related non-communicable diseases: South Asians vs White Caucasians. Int J Obes 35:167–187
Harris HR, Willett WC, Terry KL, Michels KB (2011) Body fat distribution and risk of premenopausal breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study II. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:273–278. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq500
Connolly BS, Barnett C, Vogt KN et al (2002) A meta-analysis of published literature on waist-to-hip ratio and risk of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer 44:127–138
Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng C-C, Pike MC (2007) Body size, hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer in Asian-American women. Int J Cancer 120:844–852
Lahmann PH, Hoffmann K, Allen N et al (2004) Body size and breast cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer 111:762–771
Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Boggs DA et al (2007) A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1795–1802
Enas EA, Mohan V, Deepa M et al (2007) The metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia among Asian Indians: a population with high rates of diabetes and premature coronary artery disease. J Cardiometab Syndr 2:267–275
Shu X-O, Jin F, Dai Q et al (2001) Association of body size and fat distribution with risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer 94:449–455
Misra A, Shrivastava U (2013) Obesity and dyslipidemia in South Asians. Nutrients 5:2708–2733
Opdahl S, Nilsen TIL, Romundstad PR et al (2008) Association of size at birth with adolescent hormone levels, body size and age at menarche: relevance for breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 99:201–206
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by International Agency for Research on Cancer and Department of Biotechnology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Nil.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagrani, R., Mhatre, S., Boffetta, P. et al. Understanding rural–urban differences in risk factors for breast cancer in an Indian population. Cancer Causes Control 27, 199–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0697-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0697-y