Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying promising practices for evaluation: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a systematic screening and assessment process to identify promising practices implemented by grantees of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and its partners that were appropriate for rigorous evaluation.

Methods

The systematic screening and assessment (SSA) process was conducted from September 2010 through March 2012 and included five steps: (1) nominations of promising practices; (2) a first rating by subject matter experts; (3) field-based evaluability assessments; (4) a second rating by experts; and (5) use of results. Nominations were sought in three program areas including health education and promotion, quality assurance and quality improvement, and case management/patient navigation.

Results

A total of 98 practices were nominated of which 54 % were eligible for the first review by the experts. Fifteen practices were selected for evaluability assessment with ten forwarded for the second review by the experts. Three practices were ultimately recommended for rigorous evaluation, and one evaluation was conducted. Most nominated practices were based on evidence-based strategies rather than representing new, innovative activities. Issues were identified through the process including inconsistent implementation and lack of implementation fidelity.

Conclusion

While the SSA was successful in identifying several programs for evaluation, the process also revealed important shortcomings in program implementation. Training and technical assistance could help address these issues and support improved programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breast and Cervical Cancer Mortality Prevention Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–354 (1990)

  2. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (2014). http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm. Accessed 8 May 2014

  3. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148 (2010)

  4. USPSTF A and B Recommendations: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/. Accessed 8 May 2014

  5. Institute of Medicine (2012) Primary care and public health: exploring integration to improve population health. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph D, DeGroff A, Hayes N, Wong F, Plescia M (2011) The Colorectal Cancer Control Program: partnering to increase population level screening. Gastrointest Endosc 73(3):429–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Plescia M, Wong F, Pieters J, Joseph D (2014) The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in the era of health reform: a vision forward. Cancer 120(16):2620–2624

  8. Frieden TR (2010) A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health 100:590–595

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The Guide to Community Preventive Services (2014) http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html. Accessed 8 May 2014

  10. Green LW (2006) Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health 96:406–409

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glasgow RE, Green LW, Klesges LM, Abrams DB, Fisher EB, Goldstein MG et al (2006) External validity: we need to do more. Ann Behav Med 31:105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen HT, Garbe P (2011) Assessing program outcomes from the bottom-up approach: an innovative perspective to outcome evaluation. In: Chen HT, Donaldson SI (eds) Advancing validity in outcome evaluation: theory and practice. New directions for evaluation, vol 130. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 93–106

  13. Leviton LC, Gutman MA (2010) Overview and rationale for the systematic screening and assessment method. In: Leviton LC, Kettel Khan L, Dawkins N (eds) The systematic screening and assessment method: finding innovations worth evaluating. New directions for evaluation, vol 125. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 7–31

  14. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE (2003) Evaluation: a systematic approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wholey JS (2004) Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (eds) Handbook of practical program evaluation. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 15–39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dawkins N, Wethington H, Khan LK, Grunbaum JA, Robin L, Barnes SP et al (2010) Applying the systematic screening and assessment method to childhood obesity prevention. In: Leviton LC, Kettel Khan L, Dawkins N (eds) The systematic screening and assessment method: finding innovations worth evaluating. New directions for evaluation, vol 125. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 33–49

  17. Fretchling JA (2007) Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung K, Boyce SP, Heisler H, Cash S, Lara C, Kinsella E et al (2013) Evaluation of a bundled payment system in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Women’s Wellness Connection in Colorado. In: American Public Health Association annual meeting, 2–6 Nov, Boston, MA

  19. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC (2003) Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 93:1261–1267

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spencer LM, Schooley MW, Anderson LA, Kochtitzky CS, DeGroff AS, Devlin HM et al (2013) Seeking best practices: a conceptual framework for planning and improving evidence-based practices. Prev Chronic Dis. doi:10.5888/pcd10.130186

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DeGroff A, Royalty J, Gressard L, Myles Z, Melillo S, Rice K, Joseph K, Wong F, Miller J, Kammerer W, Helsel W, Howe W, Rockwell W (2014) Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. In: Prevent Cancer Foundation’s Dialogue for Action conference, 21 March 2014, Baltimore, MD

  22. Durlak JA, DuPre EP (2008) Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol 41:327–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yancy B, DeGroff A, Royalty J, Marroulis S, Mattingly C, Bernard V (2014) Using data to effectively manage a national screening program. Cancer 120(16):2575–2583

  24. DeGroff A, Royalty J, Howe W, Buckman D, Gardner J, Poister T (2014) When performance management works: a study of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer 120(16):2566–2574

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS K-57, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA

    Amy DeGroff, Stephanie Melillo & Rebecca Glover-Kudon

  2. Public Health and Survey Research, ICF International, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Karen Cheung, Nicola Dawkins-Lyn & Mary Ann Hall

Authors
  1. Amy DeGroff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicola Dawkins-Lyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary Ann Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephanie Melillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rebecca Glover-Kudon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy DeGroff.

Additional information

Disclaimer The findings and conclusions of this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeGroff, A., Cheung, K., Dawkins-Lyn, N. et al. Identifying promising practices for evaluation: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Causes Control 26, 767–774 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0538-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation