Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Boundaries of Human Resource Managers’ Responsibilities

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses two longstanding challenges for human resource (HR) managers; how far they can and should represent the interests of both management and workers and how they can gain the power to do so. Adopting a Kantian perspective, it is argued that to pursue an ethical human resource management (HRM), HR managers need to go some way to resolving both. Three possible avenues are considered. Contemporary approaches to organisation of the HR role associated with the work of Ulrich are explored as a means of enhancing power, but rejected on the basis of research evidence as unlikely to succeed. Promotion of worker outcomes in the context of developing the link between HRM and performance offers the potential for a more ethical HRM but has not been seized by most HR managers. Finally, implementation of legislative and moral requirements to promote quality of working life is explored through the case of bullying at work. This highlights the boundaries of the HR role in a context of limited power and leads to the conclusion that it is unrealistic to look to HR managers, or at least HR managers alone, to achieve an ethical HRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, S., Givan, R., & Forth, J. (2009). The public sector in transition. In W. Brown, A. Bryson, J. Forth, & K. Whitfield (Eds.), The evolution of the modern workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., & Wright, P. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., Huselid, M., Pickus, P., & Spratt, M. (1997). HR as a source of shareholder value: Research and recommendations. Human Resource Management, 31, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Nehles, A. (2010). The line makes the difference: Line managers as effective HR partners. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, C., & Larsen, H. (2000). Responsibility in human resource management: The role of the line. In C. Brewster & H. Larsen (Eds.), Human resource management in northern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Association. (2006). Bullying and harassment of doctors in the workplace. London: British Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyens, D., & de Vos, A. (2001). Perceptions of the value of the HR function. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(3), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, R. (2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 983–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. (2007). The problem of workplace bullying. The Psychologist, 20, 284–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD/IES. (2007). The changing human resource function. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J., Lui, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 50, 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., & Cherns, A. (1975). The quality of working life. New York: Free Press. (Vols. 1 and 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., & Njoya, W. (2008). The legal framework of employment relations. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), The sage handbook of industrial relations (pp. 284–304). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2001). Beyond the high performance paradigm? An analysis of variation in Canadian managerial perceptions of reform programme effectiveness. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & De Cieri, H. (2007). Stakeholder theory and the ethics of HRM. In A. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human resource management: Ethics and employment (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. (1997). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D., & Bos-Nehles, A. (2012). HRM and performance: The role of effective implementation. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest & P. Wright (Eds.), Human resource management and performance: Progress and prospects. Chichester: Wiley.

  • Guest, D., & Bryson, A. (2009). From industrial relations to human resource management: The changing role of the personnel function. In W. Brown, A. Bryson, J. Forth, & K. Whitfield (Eds.), The evolution of the modern workplace (pp. 120–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D., Isaksson, K., & De Witte, H. (Eds.). (2010). Employment contracts, psychological contracts and employee well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D., & King, Z. (2004). Power, innovation and problem-solving: The personnel managers’ three steps to heaven? Journal of Management Studies, 41, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B., Allen, B., & Sargent, L. (2007). High performance work systems and employee experience of work in the service sector. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 607–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Democracy in Europe Group (IDE). (1993). Industrial democracy in Europe revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T. (1990). HRM: A case of the wolf in sheep’s clothing? Personnel Review, 2, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G., & Oxenbridge, S. (2006). Inside the workplace: Findings from the 2004 workplace employment relations survey. London: Routledge.

  • Khilji, S., & Wang, X. (2006). ’Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: The missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1171–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki, M., Virtanen, M., Vartia, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2003). Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60, 779–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. (2007). Social legitimacy of the HRM profession: A US perspective. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamsa, A.-M. (1999). Organizational downsizing—An ethical versus managerial viewpoint. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 20, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. (1986). High involvement management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (1978). Power, innovation and problem solving in personnel management. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (1998). Is HRM ethical? Can HRM be ethical? In M. Parker (Ed.), Ethics and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (2001). Silver bullet or spent round? Assessing the meaning of the high commitment management/performance relationship. In J. Storey (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (2nd ed., pp. 21–36). London: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (2007). The ethics of HRM in dealing with individual employees without collective representation. In A. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human resource management: Ethics and employment (pp. 35–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1966). A short history of ethics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1992). Culture in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, P., Gratton, L., Hope Hailey, V., Stiles, P., & Truss, K. (1997). Human resource management on the line? Human Resource Management Journal, 7(4), 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The ethical business. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L., Lepak, D., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the ‘why’ of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviours, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J. (Ed.). (1973). Work in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (1994). How common is workforce transformation and who adopts it? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R. (2004). Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Inaugural Address. Rotterdam: Erasmus Institute of Management (ERIM).

  • Peccei, R., van de Voorde, K., & van Veldhoven, M. (2012). HRM, well-being and performance: A theoretical and empirical review. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest & P. Wright (Eds.), Human resource management and performance: Progress and prospects. Chichester: Wiley.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B. (2000). Employees and high performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38, 501–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, C., & McIvor, K. (2008). Research report on the dignity at work project. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Trice, H. (1969). An occupation in conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. (2006). Is there such a thing as evidence-based management? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, W. (1981). Big hat, no cattle; managing human resources. Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, P., Young, S., Bartram, T., & Leggat, S. (2010). Singing the same song: Translating HRM messages across management hierarchies in Australian hospitals. International Journal of Human Resource, 21, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1992). Developments in the management of human resources. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Beatty, R. (2001). From partners to players: Extending the HR playing field. Human Resource Management, 40, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR value proposition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. (2002). The study of well-being, behaviour and attitudes. In P. Warr (Ed.), Psychology at work (5th ed., pp. 1–25). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1977). The personnel managers: A study in the sociology of work and industry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (2007). HRM, ethical irrationality and the limits of ethical action. In A. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human resource management: Ethics and employment (pp. 223–236). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (Eds.). (2000). Ethical issues in contemporary human resource management (Chap. 1, pp. 3–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Woodall, J., & Winstanley, D. (2001). The place of ethics in HRM. In J. Storey (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (pp. 37–56). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, C., & Guest, D. (2012a). When good HR gets bad results: Exploring the challenges of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying. Working Paper: Department of Management, King’s College, London.

  • Woodrow, C., & Guest, D. (2012b). Public violence, staff harassment and the well-being of UK National Health Service nurses. Health Services Management Research, 25(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Boswell, W. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28, 247–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., Gardner, T., Moynihan, L., & Allen, M. (2005). The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: Examining causal ordering. Personnel Psychology, 58, 409–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2003). Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, S. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editors and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback and guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, King’s College London, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE19NH, UK

    David E. Guest & Christopher Woodrow

Authors
  1. David E. Guest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Woodrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Guest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guest, D.E., Woodrow, C. Exploring the Boundaries of Human Resource Managers’ Responsibilities. J Bus Ethics 111, 109–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1438-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1438-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation