Abstract
Current corporate social responsibility (CSR) approaches attempt to implement the vision of sustainable development at the corporate level. In fact, the term “corporate sustainability” may be a more accurate descriptive label for these attempts. Ambitious governmental, business and academic goals, and corresponding efforts have been established. Nonetheless, a truly satisfactory implementation of the broad CSR concept as well as the more specific challenges of corporate sustainability continue to be an elusive goal at the corporate management level. This article presents a description of a new management tool, a systematic method for implementing CSR successfully on the basis of a triple bottom line approach to sustainability. It fills in many of the still missing gap on the corporate level. The method presented here offers a multi-purpose approach for the collection, systematization, quantification, and evaluation of all the relevant issues found within a corporate environment. It allows for specifying and systematizing appropriate areas of action, taking into account the continuum of economic, ecologic,1 and social dimensions. Accordingly, the article is best characterized as a treatment of complex CSR issues, developed against the normative anchor of sustainability as the conceptual background.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achleitner, P.: 1985, Sozio-politische Strategien multinationaler Unternehmungen – ein Ansatz gezielten Umweltmanagements (Haupt, Berne).
Berle, A. and G. Means: 1932, The modern corporation and private property (Commerce Clearing House, New York).
Callens, I. and D. Tyteca: 1999, ‹Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms – A productive efficiency perspective’, Ecological Economics 28, 41-53.
CSI: 2006, The Social Footprint – Introduction and Proof of Concept 2006, Draft 3.1. (Centre for Sustainable Innovation, VT), http://www.sustainableinnovation.org. Retrieved 23 Aug 2006
Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March: 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).
Czymmek, F.: 2003, Ökoeffizienz und unternehmerische Stakeholder (Josef Eul, Cologne).
Dyllick, T. and K. Hockerts: 2002, ‹Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability’, Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 130-141.
EFQM: 2003, The EFQM Excellence Model (European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels).
EFQM: 2004, The EFQM Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels).
Elkington, J.: 1994, ‹Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win–Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development’, California Management Review 36(2), 90-100.
European Commission: 2002, A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development 2002 (COM, 347 final), http://ec.europa.eu/. Retrieved 8 Mar 2006
Figge, F.: 2001, ‹Environmental Value Added – ein neues Maß zur Messung der Ökoeffizienz’, Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung 14(1-4), 184-197.
Figge, F. and T. Hahn: 2002, Sustainable Value Added – Measuring Corporate Sustainable Performance beyond Eco-Efficiency (Centre for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg).
Freeman, E. R.: 1984, Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston et al.).
German Council for Sustainable Development: 2006, ‹Corporate Responsibility in a Globalised World – German Profile of Corporate Social Responsibility – Recommendations of the German Council for Sustainable Development’, Berlin
GRI: 2002, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2002 (Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam), http://www.globalreporting.org. Retrieved 23 Aug 2006
GRI: 2006, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.0 (Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam), http://www.globalreporting.org. Retrieved 18 Aug 2007
ISEA: 1999, Account Ability 1000 (AA1000) Framework – Standards, Guidelines and Professional Qualification 1999 (Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability, London), http://www.accountability.org.uk. Retrieved 22 Aug 2006
Kakabadse, N. K., C. Rozuel and L. Lee-Davis: 2005, ‹Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach – a conceptual review’, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1(4), 277-302.
Kleine, A.: 2005, ‹Das Integrierende Nachhaltigkeits-Dreieck zur interdisziplinären und systematischen Diskussion der Nachhaltigen Entwicklung’, UmweltWirtschaftsForum 13(4), 22-27.
Kleine, A., S. Kurz and C. Schmidkonz: 2005, ‹Application of the Sustainability Triangle for BYC’, in S. Kurz and C. Schmidkonz (eds.), The impact of direct investment of BASF in Nanjing, China on the sustainable development of the region (GTZ, Nanjing), pp. 55-62.
Landesregierung Rheinland-Pfalz: 2005, ‹3. Agenda 21-Programm der Landesregierung 2005 – Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie – Perspektiven für Rheinland-Pfalz’, 14/4821, Mainz
McDonough, W. and M. Braungart: 2002, Cradle to cradle – Remaking the Way We make Things (North Point Press, New York).
Meadows, D. L., D. H. Meadows, J. Randers and W. W. Behrens: 1972, The limits to growth – a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind (Universe Books, New York).
OECD: 1998, Towards sustainable Development – environmental indicators (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris).
Rapport, D., A. Friend: 1979, Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics: a stress response approach (Statistics Canada, Ottawa).
SAI: 2001, Social Accountability 8000 (Social Accountability International, New York), http://www.sa-intl.org. Retrieved 22 Aug 2006
Saling, P., A. Kicherer, B. Dittrich-Krämer, R. Wittlinger, W. Zombik, I. Schmidt, W. Schrott and S. Schmidt: 2002, ‹Eco-efficiency Analysis by BASF – The Method’, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(4), 203-218.
SAM: 2004, Corporate Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire 2004 (Sustainable Asset Management, Zurich), http://www.sam-group.com. Retrieved 22 Aug 2006
Schaltegger, S.: 1998, ‹Accounting for Eco-Efficiency’, in B. Nath, L. Hens, P. Compton and D. Devuyst (eds.), Environmental Management in Practice – Instruments for Environmental Management, vol. 1 (Routledge, London), pp. 272-287.
Schaltegger, S. and R. Burritt: 2005, ‹Corporate sustainability’, in H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg (eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics – a survey of current issues (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham et al.), pp. 185-222.
Schaltegger, S., C. Herzig, O. Kleiber and J. Müller: 2003, Sustainability Management in Business Enterprises – Concepts and Instruments for Sustainable Development (German Federal Ministry for the Environment and Federation of German Industries, Bonn and Berlin).
Schaltegger, S. and A. Sturm: 1990, ‹Ökologische Rationalität – Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von Ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten’, Die Unternehmung 4, 273-290.
Schmidheiny, S.: 1992, Changing Course – A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Schmidt, I., M. Meurer, P. Saling, A. Kicherer, W. Reuter and C. O. Gensch: 2004, ‹Managing Sustainability of Products and Processes with the Socio-Eco-Efficiency Analysis by BASF’, Greener Management International 45, 79-94.
Simonis, U. E.: 1998, ‹Das magische Dreieck zukunftsfähiger Entwicklung’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte 49(6-7), 466.
Ulrich, P.: 1977, Das Großunternehmen als quasi-öffentliche Institution (Poeschel, Stuttgart).
UNCED: 1992, Agenda 21 (United Nations, New York).
UNCTAD: 2004, A Manual for the Preparers and Users of Eco-efficiency indicators (United Nations, New York and Geneva).
van Marrewijk, M.: 2006, ‹Corporate sustainability and sustainable development’, in J. Allouche (ed.), Concepts, accountability and reporting (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke et al.), pp. 73-98.
VDI: 2006, Sustainable management in small and medium-sized enterprises – Guidance notes for sustainable management (Beuth, Berlin).
Verfaillie, H. A. and R. Bidwell: 2000, Measuring Eco-Efficiency – A Guide to Reporting Company Performance (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva), www.wbcsd.org. Retrieved 18 Nov 2002
von Hauff, M. and A. Kleine: 2005, ‹Methodischer Ansatz zur Systematisierung von Handlungsfeldern und Indikatoren einer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie – Das Integrierende Nachhaltigkeits-Dreieck’, http://kluedo.ub.uni-kl.de/volltexte/2005/1802/. Retrieved 21 Jan 2005
von Hauff, M. and A. Kleine: 2006, ‹Methodological Approach for the Systematization of the Areas of Action and the Indicators of a Sustainability Strategy – The Integrative Sustainability Triangle’, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 5(4), 372-394.
WBCSD: 1996, Eco-Efficient Leadership for Improved Economic and Environmental Performance (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva), www.wbcsd.org. Retrieved 18 Nov 2002
WCED: 1987, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
WSSD: 2002, Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (United Nations, New York).
Zink, K. J.: 1998, Total Quality Management as a Holistic Management Concept (Springer, Berlin et al.).
Zink, K. J.: 2003 Corporate Social Responsibility Promoting Ergonomics. In: H. Luczak and K. J. Zink (eds.), Redesigning Work and Macroergonomics – Future Perspectives and Challenges vol. 7 IEA-Press, Santa Monica, pp. 63-72.
Zink, K. J.: 2005, ‹Stakeholder Orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility as a Precondition for Sustainability’, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16(8-9), 1041-1052.
Zukunftskommission der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: 1998, Wirtschaftliche Leistungsfähigkeit, sozialer Zusammenhalt, ökologische Nachhaltigkeit – Drei Ziele – ein Weg (Dietz, Bonn)
Acknowledgments
The IST has gratefully being developed within a research project funded by the ministry of environment, forest and consumer protection of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleine, A., von Hauff, M. Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 3), 517–533 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z