Skip to main content
Log in

Maynard Smith on the levels of selection question

Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The levels of selection problem was central to Maynard Smith’s work throughout his career. This paper traces Maynard Smith’s views on the levels of selection, from his objections to group selection in the 1960s to his concern with the major evolutionary transitions in the 1990s. The relations between Maynard Smith’s position and those of Hamilton and G.C. Williams are explored, as is Maynard Smith’s dislike of the Price equation approach to multi-level selection. Maynard Smith’s account of the ‘core Darwinian principles’ is discussed, as is his debate with Sober and Wilson (1998) over the status of trait-group models, and his attitude to the currently fashionable concept of pluralism about the levels of selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold A.J. and Fristrup K. (1982). The theory of evolution by natural selection: a hierarchical expansion. Paleobiology 8:113–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Avital E. and Jablonka E. (2000). Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss L. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J. and Heisler I.L. (1988). Alternative formulations of multi-level selection. Biol. Philos. 3:407–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Reeve H.K. (1994). Behavioural ecology and levels of selection: dissolving the group selection controversy. Adv. Study Behav. 23:101–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M. and Schuster P. (1979). The Hypercycle, a Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Berlin, Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M., Schuster P., Gardiner W. and Winkler-Oswatitsch R. (1981). The Origin of Genetic Information. Sci. Am. 244(4):78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank S.A. (1995). George Price’s Contribution to Evolutionary Genetics. J. Theor. Biol. 175:373–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank S.A. (1998). Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A. (1985). A Geometric View of Relatedness. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 2:28–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J. (2000). The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behaviour. Am. Nat. 97:354–356, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1–16, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 31–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. (1970). Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model. Nature 228:1218–1220, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. 1975a. Innate social aptitudes in man: an approach from evolutionary genetics, reprinted in R. Fox (ed.) Biosocial Anthropology. Wiley, New York, pp. 133–155, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 315–352

  • Hamilton W.D. (1975b). Gamblers since life began: barnacles, aphids, elms. Q. Rev. Biol. 50:175–180, reprinted in Hamilton (1996), 357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. (1996). Narrow Roads of Gene Land Volume 1: Evolution of Social Behaviour. New York, W.H. Freeman

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. (1981). Units of evolution: a metaphysical essay. In: Jensen U.J. and Harré R. (eds). The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton, Harvester Press, pp. 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr B. and Godfrey-Smith P. (2002). Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations. Biol. Philos. 17:477–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr B., Neuhauser C., Bohannan B.J.M. and Dean A.M. (forthcoming). Local Migration Promotes Competitive Restraint in a Host-Pathogen ‘Tragedy of the Commons’

  • Lack D. (1966). Population Studies of Birds. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. (1970). The units of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1976). Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 61:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1979). Hypercycles and the origin of life. Nature 20:445–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1983). Game theory and the evolution of cooperation. In: Bendall D.S. (eds). Evolution from Molecules to Man. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 445–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1984). Paleontology at the high table. Nature 309:401–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1987). How to model evolution. In: Dupré J. (eds). The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1988a). Evolutionary progress and the levels of selection. In: Nitecki M.H. (eds). Evolutionary Progress. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1988b). Selection for recombination in a polygenic model – the mechanism. Genet. Res. 51:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1988c). ‘Current Controversies in Evolutionary Biology’, in Did Darwin Get it Right?. New York, Chapman-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1991). A Darwinian view of symbiosis. In: Margulis L. and Fester R. (eds). Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1998). The origin of altruism. Nature 393:639–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (2002). Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith. Biol. Philos. 17(4):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. and Price G.R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. and Szathmáry E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod R.E. (1999). Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney L. (1985). Group selection, altruism, and structured-deme models. Am. Nat. 126:212–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. (2001). Why won’t the group selection controversy go away?. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 52(1):25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. (2004). Multi-level selection and the partitioning of covariance: a comparison of three approaches. Evolution 58(3):486–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. (2006a). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford, Oxford University Press (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. 2006b. Multi-level Selection and the Major Transitions in Evolution, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of the 2004 PSA) (in press)

  • Price G.R. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann. Hum. Genet. 35:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price G.R. (1995). The nature of selection. J. Theor. Biol. 175:389–396 (written circa 1971)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queller D.C. (1992). Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 139:540–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segersträle U. (2000). Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. Chicago, Chicago University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. and Lewontin R. (1982). Artifact, cause and genic selection. Philos. Sci. 49:157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. and Wilson D.S. (1998). Unto Others: the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Szathmáry E. and Hammerstein P. (2004). John Maynard Smith (1920–2004). Nature 429:258–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szathmáry E. and Maynard Smith J. (1997). From replicators to reproducers: the first major transitions leading to life. J. Theor. Biol. 187:555–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama M. and Feldman M.W. (1980). Theories of Kin and group selection: a population genetics perspective. Theor. Popul. Biol. 17:380–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade M. (1985). Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am. Nat. 125:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G.C. (1992). Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, Challenges. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.S. (1975). A theory of group selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7(2):143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.S. (1980). The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park CA, Benjamin/Cummings

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.S. (1987). Altruism in Mendelian populations derived from sibling groups: the haystack model revisited. Evolution 41:1059–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1980). Genic and organismic selection. Evolution 34:825–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards V.C. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Okasha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okasha, S. Maynard Smith on the levels of selection question. Biol Philos 20, 989–1010 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9019-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9019-1

Keywords

Navigation