Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics for evaluating the conservation value of species hybrids

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent and rationale for protecting species hybrids in North America is inconsistent, leading to gaps in species conservation. Currently, neither the Canadian Species at Risk Act nor the U.S. Endangered Species Act provide protection or management guidelines for hybrids. Hybrids are often viewed negatively, but occur frequently and do not always result in negative ecological or genetic consequences. With the global decline in biodiversity and potential importance of hybrids in maintaining and preserving biodiversity, it is essential that conservation and management guidelines for hybrids be established. Therefore, we analyzed 62 hybrids of potential conservation concern in Canada and the United States to identify cases where opportunities for hybrid conservation are being overlooked in policy. Hybrids were classified by cause of hybridization (natural, intentional anthropogenic, or unintentional anthropogenic), parent taxa origin (native or non-native), taxonomic class, genetic background, parent taxa protection status, hybrid conservation status (protected or managed), and prevailing attitude toward the hybrid (positive, neutral, or negative). Generally, attitudes toward hybrids depended largely on the real or perceived effect the hybrid has on human life or other highly valued species. These attitudes are influenced by the cause of hybridization and the origin of the parental taxa. Based on these findings, we identify specific gaps in current hybrid conservation research and suggest opportunities for hybrid conservation based on relevant hybrid characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ESA:

United States Endangered Species Act

SARA:

Canadian Species at Risk Act

U.S.:

United States

WWF:

World Wide Fund for Nature

References

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1948) Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold ML (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 23:237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 16:113–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann C, Mansfield B (2014) Biodiversity, purity, and death: conservation biology as biopolitics. Environ Plan D 32:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer MC, Muhlfeld CC, Allendorf FW (2008) Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) invasion and the spread of hybridization with native westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynshus clarkia lewisi). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65(4):658–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks K (2002) Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 16:488–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deatsman R (2012) Grizzlies move into Polar bear territory. Available from http://www.arcticjournal.ca/index.php/news-item/species-at-risk/. Accessed March 2014

  • Edmands S (2007) Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 16:463–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Biggs D, Kaus A, Lubinsky P, McDade LA, Preston K, Regan HM, Rorive V, Ryder OA, Schierenbeck KA (2010) Got hybridization? A multidisciplinary approach for informing science policy. Bioscience 60:384–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farlee L, Woeste K, Ostry M, McKenna J, Weeks S (2010) Conservation and management of Butternut trees. Available from https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/FNR/FNR-421-W.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Ferrier EA (2011) Perception of naturalness in a hybrid landscape: a case study of citizens engaged in Oak Ridges Moraine conservation. A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Environment and Resource Studies. Waterloo, Ontario

  • Forest Gene Conservation Association. (2014) Butternut tree—a landowner’s resource guide. Available from http://www.fgca.net/conservation/sar/pdf/Butternut_LO_Guide.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Goedbloed DJ, van Hooft P, Megens H, Langenbeck K, Lutz W, Crooijmans RPMA, van Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC, Herbert HT (2013) Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar. BMC Genet 14(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2013) Golden-winged Warbler. Available from http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/species/speciesDetails_e.cfm?sid=942. Accessed March 2014

  • Government of Canada (2014) Species at risk act. Available from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/s-15.3/. Accessed March 2014

  • Gutiérrez RJ, Cody M, Courtney S, Franklin AB (2007) The invasion of barred owls and its potential effect on the spotted owl: a conservation conundrum. Biol Invasions 9:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guynup S (2002) Interbreeding threatens rare species, experts say. National Geographic News. Available from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/12/1217_021226_tvinterbreeding.html. Accessed March 2014

  • Havinga D, Ontario Invasive Plants Working Group (2000) Sustaining biodiversity: a strategic plan for managing invasive plants in southern Ontario. Available from http://www.serontario.org/pdfs/sustain.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Hedrick PW (2009) Conservation genetics and North American bison (Bison bison). J Hered 100:411–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill KD (1993) The endangered species act: what do we mean by species? Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev 20:239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler JA, Onorato DP, Jansen D, Oli MK (2012) A cat’s tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence. J Anim Ecol 82:608–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huxel GR (1999) Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biol Conserv 89:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackiw R, Mandil G, Hager HA (2015) A framework to guide the conservation of species hybrids based on ethical and ecological considerations. Conserv Biol (in press)

  • James MC, Martin K, Dutton PH (2004) Hybridization between a green turtle, Chelonia mydas, and loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, and the first record of a green turtle in Atlantic Canada. Can Field-Nat 118:579–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch J, Mason M, Eyles A, Carey Dl, Larson R, Chan C, Smithley D, Bonello P, Herms D (2007) Development of novel ash hybrids to introgress emerald ash borer resistance to North American ash species. In: Proceedings of the 18th U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species. Available from http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs-p-28.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Kunte K, Shea C, Aardema ML, Scriber JM, Juenger TE, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR (2011) Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among Tiger Swallowtail butterflies. PLoS Genet 7:e1002274

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaneo V (2002) Bee alert: Africanized honey bee facts. Available from http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8068.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Le Clere JB, Hoaglund EP, Scharosch J, Smith CE, Gamble T (2012) Two naturally occurring intergeneric hybrid snakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi ×Pantherophis vulpinus; Lampropeltini, Squamata) from the Midwestern United States. J Herpetol 46:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (2002) Hybridization and extinction: in protecting rare species, conservationists should consider the dangers of interbreeding, which compound the more well-known threats to wildlife. Am Sci 90:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Francisco-Ortega J, Jansen RK (1994) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv Biol 10:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10:294–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20:229–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara S, Zuzek K, Rose N, Pellett H, Hokanson SC (2005) ‘Firefall’ Freeman maple. HortScience 40:269–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2007) Red Mulberry (Morus rubra) in Ontario: Ontario recovery strategy series. Available from http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@species/documents/document/stdprod_099159.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Pekkala N, Knott KE, Kotiaho JS, Nissinen K, Puurtinen M (2012) The benefits of interpopulation hybridization diminish with increasing divergence of small populations. J Evol Biol 25:2181–2193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penney M (2010) Hybrid cattails (Typha × glauca). Available from http://www.seagrant.sunysb.edu/glhabitat/PDFS/ELODWAFactSheetCattails.pdf. Accessed March 2014

  • Pfennig KS (2007) Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 318:965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price DK, Muir C (2008) Conservation implications of hybridization in Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:1217–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purves WK, Sadava D, Orians GH, Heller HC (2001) Life: the science of biology, Sixth edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, pp 178–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Randi E (2010) Wolves in the Great Lakes region: a phylogeographic puzzle. Mol Ecol 19:4386–4388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebek EJ, Herms DA, Smitley DR (2008) Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environ Entomol 37:242–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter DK, Brunson MW, Schmidt RH (1999) Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildl Soc Bull 27(3):746–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 27:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan ME, Johnsona JR, Fitzpatrick BM (2009) Invasive hybrid tiger salamander genotypes impact native amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:11166–11171

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte U, Veith M, Hochkirch A (2012) Rapid genetic assimilation of native wall lizard populations (Podarcis muralis) through extensive hybridization with introduced lineages. Mol Ecol 21(17):4313–4326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MK, Pilgrim KL, McKelvey KS, Lindquist EL, Claar JJ, Loch S, Ruggiero LF (2004) Hybridization between Canada lynx and bobcats: genetic results and management implications. Conserv Genet 5:349–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz D, Matta BM, Shakir-Botteri NL, McPheron BA (2005) Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybridspeciation. Nature 436:546–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Star W (2013) Meet the coywolves. Available from http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=2ca57382-fa2d-4ef8-8ac9-32f4402997a8. Accessed March 2014

  • Stronen AV, Paquet PC (2013) Perspectives on the conservation of wild hybrids. Biol Conserv 167:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Government (2013) Endangered species Act of 1973. Available from http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/esa/text.htm. Accessed March 2014

  • Verbrugge LNH, Van den Born RJG, Lenders HJR (2013) Exploring public perception of non-native species from a visions of nature perspective. Environ Manag 52:1562–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas J (2013) How killer bees kill. Discovery news. Available from http://news.discovery.com/animals/insects/how-killer-bees-kill-130604.htm. Accessed March 2014

  • Vila M, Weber E, D’Antonio CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS, Nammack M, Cochrane JF, Hutchings JA (2013) A tale of two acts: endangered species listing practices in Canada and the United States. Bioscience 63:723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakimowski SB, Rieseberg LH (2014) The role of homoploid hybridization in evolution: a century of studies synthesizing genetics and ecology. Am J Bot 101:1247–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Gibbs, R. Jackiw, S. Jones, G. Mandil, A. Munene, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. H. A. H. was supported by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

    Sarah Piett, Heather A. Hager & Chelsey Gerrard

Authors
  1. Sarah Piett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather A. Hager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chelsey Gerrard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather A. Hager.

Additional information

Communicated by Jan C Habel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supporting information: A list of all species hybrids and their corresponding characteristics (Appendix S1) is available online. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of material) should be directed to the corresponding author.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 333 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piett, S., Hager, H.A. & Gerrard, C. Characteristics for evaluating the conservation value of species hybrids. Biodivers Conserv 24, 1931–1955 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0919-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0919-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation