Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ranking threats using species distribution models in the IUCN Red List assessment process

  • Comment
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), species distribution models (SDM) are used with two main purposes: (1) to estimate extents of occurrence as a parameter of risk of extinction and, more recently, (2) to explore potential impacts of climate change on species distribution. In this article I propose a third use of SDM: to generate objective and quantitative rankings of threats for the species categorized within the Red List. Although, some authors have published threat analyses based on SDM, most current ranking of threats conducted within IUCN Specialist Groups still relies on the subjective perspectives of workshop attendees or individual experts. I found that SDMs are ideal for incorporating theoretical and mathematical rigour to the ranking threat process, because: (1) they are of relatively easy and fast implementation, (2) they can be used with different levels of knowledge about the species in question, and (3) they are particularly suitable for use at the geographical scale for which the IUCN Red List is designed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 157:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MJ, Ferson S, Akcakaya HR (1993) Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassini MH (2011) Ecological principles of species distribution models: the habitat matching law. J Biogeogr (in press)

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham HS, Wilson KA, Moilanen A, Rebelo T, Possingham HP (2009) Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait? Ecol Lett 12:293–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MW (2009) The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List. Conserv Biol 23:1568–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen R, Luoto M, Aráujo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progr Phys Geogr 30:751–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002) Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83:2027–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland ii + 30 pp

  • IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, ii + 26 pp

  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2010) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 8.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2011

  • Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Townsend Peterson A (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J Biogeogr 34:102–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Div Distr 11:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from CONICET (PIP Nº 11420090100367) and the University of Luján (Fondos Finalidad 3.5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo H. Cassini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassini, M.H. Ranking threats using species distribution models in the IUCN Red List assessment process. Biodivers Conserv 20, 3689–3692 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0126-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0126-9

Keywords

Navigation