Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Acacia invasive success in South Africa on the basis of functional traits, native climatic niche and human use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australian Acacia species have been widely planted worldwide for different purposes. Some of them have spread and altered the native ecosystem functions to the extent of being considered economic and ecologic threats. Understanding factors that allow these species to become invasive is an important step for mitigating or preventing the damaging effects of invasive species. We aimed to test the importance of native niche climatic width and average, plant functional traits (plant height, leaf area, seed mass and length of flowering season) and anthropogenic factors (number of uses, time since introduction) for predicting invasive success, in terms of abundance and range, of 16 Australian Acacia species in South Africa. By using multiple regression analysis, we constructed one different model for each type of predicting factors. When more than two predicting variables were available in a category, they were reduced to a maximum of two predictors by means of principal component analysis. Acacia spp. abundance and range in South Africa were highly correlated. The anthropogenic model (using number of human uses as predictor) was the best to explain both abundance and range of acacias in South Africa. This may be attributed to the importance of humans as dispersal vectors and to the relatively recent introduction of these species (circa 150 years). The functional traits model was the next best model explaining Acacia range, but not abundance, acacias with higher height and leaf area being more widespread in South Africa. Taller plants may disperse their seeds more efficiently by attracting dispersal agents, such as birds. The climatic affinities model was the following in the ranking explaining both range and abundance, acacias coming from moister, cooler and less seasonal regions in Australia being more successful in South Africa. This pattern may be attributed to the fast growth genotype generally selected for under low climatic stress conditions. Acacias with wide climatic niche in the native region were also more widespread and abundant in South Africa, probably because the same traits that allow them to be widespread in Australia, also contribute to overcome the climatic filters to establish throughout South Africa. This study provides managers with tools to identify those exotic Acacia ssp. having more chances to become successful invaders in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FL:

Length of flowering time

H:

Plant mean height

LA:

Leaf area

No.uses:

Number of uses

Pm.range:

Annual precipitation range

Pm:

Annual precipitation

Pseas.range:

Precipitation seasonality range

Pseas:

Precipitation seasonality

RT:

Mean residence time

SM:

Mean seed mass

Tm.range:

Annual temperature range

Tm:

Annual temperature

Tseas.range:

Temperature seasonality range

Tseas:

Temperature seasonality

References

  • AGIS (2007) Agricultural Geo-Referenced Information System. http://www.agis.agric.za/wip. Accessed on May 2009

  • Albright TP, Chen H, Chen L, Qinfeng G (2010) The ecological niche and reciprocal prediction of the disjunct distribution of an invasive species: the example of Ailanthus altissima. Biol Invasions 12:2413–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3:52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston KP, Richardson DM (2006) The roles of habitat features, disturbance, and distance from putative source populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Biol Conserv 132:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton C, Guerin J, Ducatillion C, Medail F, Kull CA, Berville A (2008) Taming the wild and ‘wilding’ the tame: tree breeding and dispersal in Australia and the Mediterranean. Plant Sci 175:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns JH (2004) A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib 10:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Lovett-Doust J (2001) Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Ecoscience 8:230–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Murray BR, Lovett-Doust J (2006a) Ecological patterns and biological invasions: using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol Invasions 8:809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Murray BR, Lovett-Doust J (2006b) Evolutionary and ecological influences of plant invader success in the flora of Ontario. Ecoscience 13:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro SA, Figueroa JA, Munoz-Schick M, Jaksic FM (2005) Minimum residence time, biogeographical origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographical extent of naturalized plants in continental Chile. Divers Distrib 11:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Saldaña A, Richardson DM (2011) Predicting invasiveness of Australian Acacia species on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life-history traits and human use. Divers Distrib (in press)

  • Daehler CC (2003) Performances’s comparisons of co-ocurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:183–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson W, Burslem D, Hulme PE (2009) Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J Ecol 97:657–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennill GB, Donnelly D (1991) Biological-control of Acacia longifolia and related weed species (Fabaceae) in South-Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 37:115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications, London, p 779

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman J (2003) The introduction of American plant species into Europe: issues and consequences. In: Child LE, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pyšek P (eds) Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 17–39

  • Gaston KJ (1998) Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 353:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson M, Fuentes A, Johnson SD, Millar M, Pauw A, Richardson DM, Rodger J, Wandrag E (2011) Reproductive ecology of Australian acacias: fundamental mediator of invasive success? Divers Distrib (in press)

  • Glyphis JP, Milton SJ, Siegfried WR (1981) Dispersal of Acacia cyclops by birds. Oecologia 48:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1988) The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies-origins, implications and tests. In: Gottlieb LD, Jain SK (eds) Plant evolutionary biology. Chapman and Hall, Cambridge, pp 371–393

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M (2007) High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am J Bot 94:526–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett 8:1066–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson L (2007) Invasive, naturalized and casual alien plants in southern Africa: a summary based on the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas (SAPIA). Bothalia 37:215–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am Nat 153:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron S, Parra J, Jones P, Jarvis A, Richardson K (2009) WorldClim. Global climate data. Version 1.4 (release 3). http://www.worldclim.org/. Accessed on July 2008

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Küster EC, Kühn I, Bruelheide H, Klotz S (2008) Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora. J Ecol 96:860–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake JC, Leishman MR (2004) Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores. Biol Conserv 117:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Maitre DC, van Wilgen BW, Chapman RA, McKelly DH (1996) Invasive plants and water resources in the Western Cape province, South Africa: modeling the consequences of a lack of management. J Appl Ecol 33:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 853

    Google Scholar 

  • Leishman MR, Haslehurst T, Ares A, Baruch Z (2007) Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons. New Phytol 176:635–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret F, Medail F, Brandu G, Hulme PE (2004) Local and regional abundance of exotic plant species on Mediterranean islands: are species traits important? Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret F, Médail F, Brundu G, Camarda I, Moragues E, Rita J, Lambdon P, Hulme PE (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J Ecol 93:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll EJ (1978) Blackwood Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. In: Stirton CH (ed) Plant invaders, beautiful but dangerous. ABC Press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 52–55

  • Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, p 457

  • Morris MJ (1991) The use of plant pathogens for biological weed control in South Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 37:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel JL, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Mgidi TN, Mdzeke N, Le Maitre DC, van Wilgen BW, Schonegevel L, Henderson L, Neser S (2004) A proposed classification of invasive alien plant species in South Africa: towards prioritizing species and areas for management action. S Afr J Sci 100:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Rooney TP (2006) On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (2005) Aquatic nuisance species in the New York State Canal and Hudson River systems and the Great Lakes Basin: an economic and environmental assessment. Environ Manage 35:692–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R (2002) Which species become aliens? Evol Ecol Res 4:385–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biol invasions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 97–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78:375–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Kluge RL (2008) Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspect Plant Ecol 10:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM (2003) Understanding patterns of plant invasion at different spatial scales: quantifying the roles of environment and propagule pressure. In: Child L, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pysek P, Wade PM, Child L, Brock JH, Brundu G, Prach K, Pysek P, Wade PM, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions. Backhuys, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM, Nel JL, Le Maitre DC, Egoh B, Mgidi T (2004) Mapping the potential ranges of major plant invaders in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland using climatic suitability. Divers Distrib 10:475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JK, Panetta FD (1993) Predicting the Australian weed status of Southern African plants. J Biogeogr 20:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy GL (1986) A case study of some woody plant introductions to the Cape Town area. In: Macdonald IAW, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA (eds) The ecology and management of biological invasions in Southern Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 37–46

  • Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for prediction the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biol 11:2234–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Proches S, Wilson JRU (2006) Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87:1755–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleunen M, Johnson SD (2007) South African Iridaceae with rapid and profuse seedling emergence are more likely to become naturalized in other regions. J Ecol 95:674–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleunen M, Johnson SD, Fischer M (2007) Predicting naturalization of Southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J Appl Ecol 44:594–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wilgen BW, Le Maitre DC, Cowling RM (1998) Ecosystem services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: South Africa’s working for water programme. Trends Ecol Evol 13:378–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E (2003) Invasive species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Welk E (2004) Constraints in range predictions of invasive plant species due to non-equilibrium distribution patterns: purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Ecol Model 179:551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelenik SG, Stock WD, Richardson DM (2004) Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acacia saligna in the South African fynbos. Restor Ecol 12:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelenik SG, Stock WD, Richardson DM (2007) Functional group identity does not predict invader impacts: differential effects of nitrogen-fixing exotic plants on ecosystem function. Biol Invasions 9:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng YL, Feng YL, Liu WX, Liao ZY (2009) Growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and its native congeners grown at four irradiances. Plant Ecol 203:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grants CGL2007-61873/BOS, CGL2010-16388/BOS of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, POII10-0179-4700 of Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha and the REMEDINAL network S2009/AMB-1783 (Comunidad de Madrid). T. Langendoen acknowledges the University of Wageningen for the Erasmus grant during his stay at Alcalá University. We are indebted to Fabio Suzart for his technical support to the GIS work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Castro-Díez.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castro-Díez, P., Langendoen, T., Poorter, L. et al. Predicting Acacia invasive success in South Africa on the basis of functional traits, native climatic niche and human use. Biodivers Conserv 20, 2729–2743 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0101-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0101-5

Keywords

Navigation