Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat loss effects on spatial distribution of non-vascular epiphytes in a Brazilian Atlantic forest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vertical distribution of the richness, abundance, and composition of epiphytic bryophytes was studied in a matrix of fragmented habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest of the Murici Ecological Station (9°11′05″–9°16′48″ S, 35°45′20″–35°55′12″ W), northeastern Brazil. The aim was to compare the horizontal (between sites) and vertical (between phorophyte heights) turnover to test a hypothesis based on niche width vulnerability. There was a highly significant decreasing of richness accompanying the loss of habitat, and the most conserved fragment housed a total richness more than 10 times higher than the less conserved fragment. Epiphytes failed to colonize lower trunks (2.1–10 m) and higher zones in most of the non-conserved fragments; they were restricted to the base (0–2 m) and displayed a clear altered floristic composition. The species with restricted ecological amplitudes such as sun and shade tolerant taxa were more negatively affected by habitat loss than generalists. Although the mean richness of generalists decreased in non conserved fragments, the proportional contribution of this guild increased, proving that these taxa are the ones which persist in disturbed sites. The forest fragments capable of harboring rich epiphyte flora in the area studied are over 300 ha in size, which is far from being a common size among Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragments. Hence, our results highlight the need of conserving the few large remnants in this ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acebey A, Gradstein SR, Krömer T (2003) Species richness and habitat diversification of bryophytes in submontane rain forest and fallows of Bolivia. J Trop Ecol 19:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga LDP, Pôrto KC (2007) Patch size and isolation effects on epiphytic and epiphyllous bryophytes in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biol Conserv 34(3):415–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarenga LDP, Pôrto KC, Silva MPP (2009) Relations between regional-local habitat loss and metapopulation properties of epiphyllous bryophytes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica (in press). doi:10.1111_j.1744-7429.2009.00532

  • Andersson MS, Gradstein SR (2005) Impact of different management intensities on non-vascular epiphyte diversity in cacao plantations in western Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 14:1101–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryanti NS, Bos MM, Kartawiniata K, Tjitrosoedirdjo SS, Guhardja E, Gradstein SR (2008) Bryophytes on tree trunks in natural forests, selectively logged forests and cacao agroforests in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biol Conserv 141:2516–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Peres CA, Henriques LMP et al (2006) The responses of understorey birds to forest fragmentation, logging and wildfires: an Amazonian synthesis. Biol Conserv 128:182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott W, Schimt-Neuerburg V, Nieder J et al (2001) Diversity and abundance vegetation and primary montane rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant Ecol 152:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-Malvido J, Martínez-Ramos M (2003) Impact of forest fragmentation on understory plant species richness in Amazonia. Conserv Biol 17(2):389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzing DH (1990) Vascular epiphytes. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop J, Myers LW (2005) Associations between avian functional guild response and regional landscape properties for conservation planning. Ecol Indic 5:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil—MMA (2000) Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a conservação da biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica e Campos Sulinos. Conservation International do Brasil, Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica, Fundação Biodiversitas, Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, SEMAD/Instituto Estadual de Florestas-MG, Brasília

  • Buck WR (1998) Pleurocarpous mosses of the West Indies. Mem N Y Bot Gard 1:1–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S-C, Lai I-L, Wu J-T (2002) Estimation of fog deposition on epiphytic bryophytes in a subtropical montane forest ecosystem in northeastern Taiwan. Atmos Res 64:159–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleavitt NL (2005) Patterns, hypotheses and processes in the biology of rare bryophytes. Bryologist 108:554–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC, Gradstein SR (1990) On the occurrence of bryophytes and macrolichens in different lowland rain forest types at Mabura Hill, Guyana. Trop Bryol 3:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC, ter Steege H (1989) Distribution and ecology of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in dry evergreen forest of Guyana. J Trop Ecol 5:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa DP (1999) Epiphytic bryophyte diversity in primary and secondary lowland rainforest in southeastern Brazil. Bryologist 102(2):320–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florschütz PA (1964) The mosses of Suriname. E.J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer GW, Trofymow JA, Lertzman KP (2000) Canopy openness and leaf area in chronosequences of coastal temperate rainforests. Can J For Res 30:239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR (1992) Threatened bryophytes of the neotropical rain forest: a status report. Trop Bryol 6:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR (1994) Lejeuneaceae, Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotrop Monogr 62:1–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR (2008) Epiphytes of tropical montane forests—impact of deforestation and climate change. In: Gradstein SR, Homeier J, Gansert D (eds) The tropical mountain forest. University Press, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR, Costa DP (2003) Liverworts and hornworts of Brazil. Mem N Y Bot Gard 87:1–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR, Hietz P, Lücking R et al (1996) How to sample the epiphytic diversity of tropical rain forests. Ecotropica 2:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar Allen N (2001) Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Mem N Y Bot Gard 86:1–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Parker GR (1994) Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landsc Urban Plan 29:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietz-Siefert U, Hietz P, Guevara S (1996) Epiphyte vegetation and diversity on remnant trees after forest clearance in southern Veracruz, Mexico. Biol Conserv 75:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JL, Curran PJ (2003) Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J Biogeogr 30:1391–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (1985) Atlas Nacional do Brasil: Região Nordeste. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness J (2006) Surface tools (surf_tools.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 1.6a. Jenness Enterprises. Available in: http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/surface_tools.htm

  • Kapos V (1989) Effects of isolation on water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon. J Trop Ecol 5:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krömer T, Gradstein SR (2004) Species richness of epiphytes in montane rain forests and fallows in Bolivia. Selbyana 25:190–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence WF (1999) Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biol Conserv 91:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence WF, Ferreira LV, Rankin-de Merona JM et al (1998) Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79(6):2032–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leerdam A, Veneklaas EJ (1990) The distribution of epiphyte growth-forms in the canopy of a Colombian cloud forest. Vegetatio 87:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General technical report PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffet MW, Lowman MD (1995) Canopy access techniques. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest canopies. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Montfoort D, Ek RC (1990) Vertical distribution and ecology of epiphytic Bryophytes and lichens in a lowland rain forest in French Guiana. PhD Thesis, Institute of Systematic Botany, Utrecht

  • Moura FBP (2006) A Mata Atlântica em Alagoas. Editora da UFAL, Maceió

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöske N, Hilt N, Werner F, Brehm G, Fiedler K, Sipman HJ, Gradstein SR (2008) Disturbance effects on diversity of epiphytes and moths in a montane forest in Ecuador. Basic Appl Ecol 9:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MA, Grillo AS, Tabarelli M (2003) Forest edge in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: drastic changes in trees species assemblages. Oryx 38:389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmawathe R, Qureshi Q, Rawat GS (2004) Effects of selective logging on vascular epiphyte diversity in a moist lowland forest of eastern Himalaya, India. Biol Conserv 119:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda E, Halffter G (2004) Species diversity and habitat fragmentation: frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico. Biol Conserv 117:499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pócs T (1982) The tropical bryophytes. In: Smith AJE (ed) Bryophyte ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 54–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pócs T, Tóthmérész B (1997) Foliicolous bryophyte diversity in tropical rainforest. Abstr Bot 21:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Rodrigues H (2001) Biologia da Conservação. Midiograf, Londrina

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ (1996) Community ecology. TJ Press (Padstow) Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Blom T, Niemelä J et al (1998) The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades FM (1995) Nonvascular epiphytes in forest canopies: worldwide distribution, abundance and ecological roles. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest canopies. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 353–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards PW (1984) The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes. In: Schuster RM (ed) New manual of bryology. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, pp 1233–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp AJ, Crum H, Eckel PM (1994) The moss flora of Mexico. Mem N Y Bot Gard 69:1–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MPP, Pôrto KC (2009) Effect of fragmentation on the community structure of epixylic bryophytes in Atlantic Forest remnants in the Northeast of Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18:317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporn SG, Bos MM, Hoffstätter-Müncheberg M, Kessler M, Gradstein SR (2009) Microclimate determines community composition but not richness of epiphytic understory bryophytes of rainforest and cacao agroforest in Indonesia. Funct Plant Biol 36:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Mantovani W, Peres CA (1999) Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant guild structure in the montane Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Biol Conserv 91:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonhasca A Jr (2005) Ecologia e história natural da Mata Atlântica. Editora Interciência, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner TH, Tan HTW, Wee YC et al (1994) A study of plant species extinction in Singapore, lessons for conservation of tropical biodiversity. Conserv Biol 83:705–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniyal PL (1999) Role of bryophytes in conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity. Botanica 49:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso HP, Rangel-Filho ALR, Lima JCA (1991) Classificação da vegetação brasileira adaptada a um sistema universal. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneklaas EJ, Zagt RJ, Leerdam A et al (1990) Hydrological properties of the epiphyte mass of a montane tropical rain forest, Colombia. Vegetatio 89:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JHD (2005) The response of epiphytes to anthropogenic disturbance of pine-oak forest in the highlands of Chiapas, México. For Ecol Manage 212:376–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman CE (2003) Habitat fragmentation impacts on epiphyllous bryophyte communities in central Amazonia. Ecology 84:948–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank W. L. Silva, M. Dantas de Paula, A. Alves-Araújo and S. O. Costa for technical, logistical, and scientific support, as well as Dr. C. P. Alves-Costa for aid in analyzing the data. This study was carried out with the financial support of the Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisi Dámaris Pereira Alvarenga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvarenga, L.D.P., Pôrto, K.C. & de Oliveira, J.R.d.P.M. Habitat loss effects on spatial distribution of non-vascular epiphytes in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodivers Conserv 19, 619–635 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9723-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9723-2

Keywords

Navigation