Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity of reproductive modes in anurans communities in the Caatinga (dryland) of northeastern Brazil

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anuran reproductive activities in xeric environments are strongly influenced by local rainfall and temperatures. Anuran species that inhabit the Caatinga biome in northeastern Brazil demonstrate numerous behavioral and reproductive strategies that avoid or minimize the negative effects of elevated temperatures and scarce water resources on egg development. Among the various anuran species found in the Caatinga region, members of the family Leptodactylidae demonstrate the greatest number of reproductive modes adapted to a terrestrial life style while most of the Hylidae species are more susceptible to variations in water availability. Laying eggs in foam nests is a common strategy among species that inhabit environments with open vegetation forms and water resources that are restricted to only short periods during the year. Data concerning anuran communities in the localities examined here indicated a greater diversity of reproductive modes in ponds with more diverse vegetation structures and longer periods of water availability indicating that the deeper the temporary ponds (permitting a longer hydroperiod) the more diverse will be the aquatic and bordering vegetation, and the richer will be the diversity of anuran species observed and the number of reproductive modes encountered there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ab’Sáber NS (1977) Problemática da desertificação e da savanização no Brasil intertropical. Geomorfologia 53:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichinger M (1987) Annual activity patterns of anurans in a seasonal neotropical enviroment. Oecologia 71:583–592. doi:10.1007/BF00379302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AmphibiaWeb (2008) Information on amphibian biology and conservation. http://amphibiaweb.org. Cited 04 Feb 2008

  • Arzabe C (1999) Reproductive activity patterns of anurans in two different altitudinal sites within the Brazilian Caatinga. Rev Bras Zool 16(3):851–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzabe C, Prado CPA (2006) Distinct architectures of subterranean nests in the genus Leptodactylus of the fuscus group (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Herpetol Rev 37(1):23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzabe C, Carvalho CX, Costa MAG (1998) Anurans assemblages in Crasto Forest ponds (Sergipe, State, Brazil): comparative, structure and calling activity patterns. J Herpetol 3:111–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzabe C, Skuk G, Santana GG, Delfim FR, Lima YCC, Abrantes SHF (2005) Herpetofauna da area de Curimataú, Paraíba. In: Araújo FS, Rodal MJN, Barbosa MRV (eds) Análise das variações da biodiversidade do bioma Caatinga: Suporte a estratégias regionais de conservação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, pp 260–273

  • Ávila RW, Ferreira VL (2004) Riqueza e densidade de vocalização de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool 21(4):887–892. doi:10.1590/S0101-81752004000400024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT (2002) Utilização de habitats reprodutivos e micro-habitats de vocalização em uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) da Mata Atlântica do sudeste do Brasil. Pap Avulsos Zool 42(11):287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell JP (1986) Selection of egg deposition sites: a seasonal shift in the southern leopard frog, Rana sphenocephala. Copeia 1:249–255. doi:10.2307/1444923

  • Caldwell JP, Lopez PT (1989) Foam generating behavior in tadpoles of Leptodactylus mystaceus. Copeia 2:498–502. doi:10.2307/1445453

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso AJ, Arzabe C (1993) Corte e desenvolvimento larvário de Pleurodema diplolistris (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Rev Bras Biol 53(4):561–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro MCL, Magalhães PS, Junca FA (2004) Descrição do girino e vocalização de Scinax pachychrus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arq Mus Nac 62(3):241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascon P (1987) Observações sobre Diversidade, Ecologia e Reprodução na Anurofauna de uma Área de Caatinga. Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

  • Castelletti CHM, Santos AMM, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC (2003) Quanto ainda resta da Caatinga? Uma estimativa preliminar. In: Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC (eds) Ecologia e conservação da Caatinga. Editora da Universitária da UFPE, pp 719–734

  • Crump ML (1974) Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Misc Publ Mus Nat Hist Univ Kans 61:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Riva I (1999) A new Phyllomedusa from southwesttern Amazonia (Amphibia: Anura). Rev Esp Herpetol 13:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Paniagua C (1990) Temporary ponds as breeding sites of amphibians at a locality in southwestern Spain. Herpetol J 1:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie JR (1984) How Leptodactylus fuscus tadpoles make foam, and why. Copeia 3:778–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1978) The ecology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Kansas

  • Duellman WE (1985) Reproductive modes in anuran amphibians: phylogenetic significance of adaptive strategies. S Afr J Sci 81:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1986) Diversidad y evolucion adaptativa de los hilidos neotropicales (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae). An Mus Hist Nat Valpar 17:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1995) Temporal fluctuations in abundances of anuran amphibians in a seasonal Amazonian rainforest. J Herpetol 29(1):13–21. doi:10.2307/1565080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1999) Distribution patterns of amphibians in South America. In: Duellman WE (ed) Patterns of distribution of amphibians: a global perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 255–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1994) Biology of amphibians. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Eterovick PC, Fernandes GW (2001) Why do breeding frogs colonize some puddles more than others? Phyllomedusa 1(1):31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Eterovick PC, Sazima I (2000) Description of the tadpole of Leptodactylus syphax, with a comparasion of morphological and ecological characters of tadpoles and adults of the species in the L. pentadactylus group (Leptodactylidae, Anura). Amphib-reptil 21:341–350. doi:10.1163/156853800507534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost DR (2007) Amphibian species of the world. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. Cited 04 Feb 2008

  • Giarreta AA, Facure CG (2004) Reproductive ecology and behavior of Thoropa miliaris (Spix, 1824) (Anura, Leptodactylidae, Telmatobiine). Biotaneotropica 4(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RC, Buley KR (2004) Maternal care and oblicatory oophagy in Leptodactylus fallax: a new reproductive mode in frogs. Copeia 1:128–135. doi:10.1643/CE-02-091R2

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (1998) Distribution of woodland amphibians along a fragmentation gradient. Landsc Ecol 13:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad CFB, Hödl W (1997) New reproductive mode in anurans: bubble nest in Chiasmocleis leucosticta (Mycrohylidae). Copeia 3:585–588. doi:10.2307/1447563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad CFB, Pombal JP (1998) Redescription of Physalaemus spiniger (Anura: Leptodactylidae) and description of two new reproductive modes. J Herpetol 32(4):557–565. doi:10.2307/1565210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad FB, Sawaya RJ (2000) Reproductive modes of Atlantic Forest Hylid frogs: a general overview and description of a new mode. Biotropica 32(4):862–871. doi:10.1646/0006-3606(2000)032[0862:RMOAFH]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA (2005) Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55(3):207–217. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0207:RMIFAT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad CFB, Pombal JP, Gordo M (1990) Foam nesting in a hylid frogs (Amphibia, anura). J Herpetol 24(2):225–226. doi:10.2307/1564239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hero JM (1990) An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in Central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Amazoniana 11(2):201–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR (1969) The adaptive ecology of the species group of genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Evolution Int J Org Evolution 23:421–428. doi:10.2307/2406697

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR (1973) Systematics of the mamoratus group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Contrib Sci 252(9):1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR (1974) Relationships of the marmoratus species group (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) within the subfamily Leptodactylinae. Contrib Sci Nat Hist Mus Los Angel Cty 253:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hödl W (1990) Reproductive diversity in Amazonian lowland frogs. Fortschr Zool 38:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA, Mossman MJ, Hemesath LM, Lannoo M (1999) Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conserv Biol 13(6):1437–1446. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaClaire VL (1995) Vegetation of sekected upland temporary ponds in north and north-central Florida. Mus Nat Hist 38(3):69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León JR (1975) Desarrollo temprano y notas sobre la historia natural de la larva de Hyla x-signata (Amphybia: Hylidae). Caribb J Sci 15(1–2):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson EE, Hero JM (1991) Predation and evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia 86:310–318. doi:10.1007/BF00317595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins M (1988) Biologia reprodutiva de Leptodactylus fuscus em Boa Vista, Roraima (Amphibia, Anura). Rev Bras Biol 48(4):969–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos RHR, Andrade GV, Hass A (2000) Reproductive biology and territoriality of Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis in northeastern Brazil. Herpetol Rev 31(2):84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton EM, Herman JR, Celarier EA, Wilkinson JW, Carey C, Rusin RJ (2000) Evaluating ultraviolet radiation exposure with satellite data at sites of amphibian declines in Central and South America. Conserv Biol 15(4):914–929. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004914.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SL (1991) Intermale spacing and calling site characteristics in a southern Mississippi chorus of Hyla cinerea. Copeia 2:521–524. doi:10.2307/1446601

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira G, Lima AP (1991) Seasonal patterns of juvenile recruitment and reproduction in four species of leaf litter frogs in Central Amazonia. Herpetologica 47(3):295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Muedeking MH, Heyer WR (1976) Descriptions of eggs and reproductive patterns of Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica 32:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitzky AH, Wells KD (2004) Herpetology, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  • Perotti MG (1994) Aportes preliminaries sobre la reproducción en una comunidad de anuros chaqueños en Argentina. Cuad Herpetol 8(1):39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Hopey ME, Jennings BT, Baird SD, Boone SJ (1994) Breeding habitat of wood frogs and American toads: the role of interespecific tadpole predation and adult choice. Copeia 3:691–697. doi:10.2307/1447185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombal JP, Haddad CFB (2005) Estratégias e modos reprodutivos de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poça permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, sudeste do Brasil. Pap Avulsos Zool 45(15):201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Lopes FS (2000) Reproductive strategies of Leptodactylus chaquensis and L. podicipinus in the Pantanal, Brazil. J Herpetol 34(1):135–139. doi:10.2307/1565249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB (2002) Description of a new reproductive mode in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with a review of the reproductive specialization toward terrestriality in the genus. Copeia 4:1128–1133. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[1128:DOANRM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB (2005) Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphib-reptil 26(2):211–221. doi:10.1163/1568538054253375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JD (1989) Non-foamy egg masses in Limnodynastes tasmaniensis (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from South Australia. Copeia 2:488–492. doi:10.2307/1445450

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues MT (2003) Herpetofauna da Caatinga. In: Leal I, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC (eds) Ecologia e conservação da Caatinga. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, pp 181–236

  • Rossa-Feres DC, Jim J (1994) Distribuição sazonal em comunidades de anfíbios anuros na região de Botucatu, São Paulo. Rev Bras Biol 54(2):323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossa-Feres DC, Nomura F (2006) Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil. BiotaNeotropica 6(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe SN, Duellman WE (1973) Quantitative constraints with reproductive mode in anurans. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio EVSB (1995) Overview of the Brazilian Caatinga. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 35–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos AM, Tabarelli M (2002) Distance from roads and cites as a predictor of habitat loss and fragmentation in the Caatinga vegetation of Brazil. Braz J Biol 64(4):897–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1987) Relationship of pond drying to the reproductive success of the salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Copeia 1:61–69. doi:10.2307/1446038

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva WR, Giaretta AA, Facure KG (2005) On the natural history of the South American pepper frog, Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae). J Nat Hist 39(7):555–566. doi:10.1080/00222930410001671273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RC, Cohen NW (1995) A natural history of amphibian. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo LF, Haddad CFB (2005) Acoustic Repertoire and call behavior of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura, Hyliade). J Herpetol 39(3):455–464. doi:10.1670/139-04A.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo LF, Zina J, Haddad CFB (2003) Distribuição espacial e temporal de uma comunidade de anfíbios anuros do município de Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil. Holos Environ 3(2):136–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak SC, Frissel CA (1999) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14(1):18–30. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC (2005) Diversidade, distribuição espacial e temporal de anfíbios anuros (Amphibia, anura) na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. BiotaNeotropica 5(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Velloso A, Sampaio EVSB, Paryen FGC (2002) Ecorregiões: propostas para o bioma Caatinga. Instituto de Conservação Ambiental, The Nature Conservancy do Brasil, Associação Plantas do Nordeste

  • Viera WLS (2006) Anurofauna associada a ambientes aquáticos temporários em uma área de Caatinga (São João do Cariri, Paraíba, Brasil). Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

  • Viera WLS, Arzabe C, Santana GG (2007a) Composição e distribuição espaço-temporal de anuros no Cariri Paraibano, Nordeste do Brasil. Oecol Bras 11(3):383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viera WLS, Santana GG, Vieira KS (2007b) Description of the tadpole of Leptodactylus vastus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Zootaxa 1529:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1987) Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68(5):1437–1452. doi:10.2307/1939227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wogel H, Abrunhosa PA, Pombal JP (2002) Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambiente temporário. Iheringia Ser Zool 92(2):57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BL, Rodrigues MT (1990) Frogs, snakes, and lizards of the INPA–WWF Reserve near Manaus, Brazil. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 427–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BL, Simberloff D (1996) An historical interpretation of habitat use by frogs in a central amazonian forest. J Biogeogr 23:27–46. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.d01-218.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Eunice Braz (in memoria) for her support in undertaking the herptofauna inventory at the Fazenda Almas Private Nature Reserve; Dr. Maria Regina de Vasconcellos Barbosa (General Coordinator of PELD/PB); Roberto Lima for his invaluable help and collaboration; as well as the PELD (Programa Ecológico de Longa Duração)/UFPB/PB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Washington Luiz da Silva Vieira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva Vieira, W.L., Santana, G.G. & Arzabe, C. Diversity of reproductive modes in anurans communities in the Caatinga (dryland) of northeastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18, 55–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9434-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9434-0

Keywords

Navigation