Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Participatory Resource Monitoring as a Means for Promoting Social Change in Yunnan, China

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent international forest policies stimulate involvement of communities in forest management as a strategy to improve biodiversity conservation and the quality of local livelihoods. Increasingly, the role of local people in monitoring forest resources is also acknowledged. This paper presents a participatory resources monitoring (PRM) system developed and implemented by representatives of 12 villages, six each within and adjacent to two nature reserves in Yunnan, China. The short-term objectives are to monitor resource and wildlife abundance, resource use, wildlife damage to crops, and land use. Main methods used by the village monitoring team are: (1) observation through forest walk, (2) village interview, and (3) market survey. Monitoring is implemented throughout the year to fit in the daily work of villagers. Staff from the nature reserve or forestry bureau provide support by visiting the villages several days per year. Results indicate that participatory monitoring is a valuable tool for villagers to engage in self-owned management actions. We discuss how monitoring is also a process which could lead to social change. Based on narratives we suggest that participatory monitoring builds trust between stakeholders, changes perceptions and attitudes and leads to more democratic and transparent decision-making. In discussing accuracy, we argue that all stakeholders perceive and interpret nature differently based on different worldviews, knowledge systems, values and beliefs. We argue that if participatory monitoring is to be sustainable, community-based monitoring – preferably linked to scientific monitoring and patrolling – should be designed as a discursive institution where the process of building social capital and inter-actor learning is extremely important. Finally, we briefly reflect upon efforts to scale up participatory monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Agrawal C.C. Gibson (1999) ArticleTitleEnchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation World Develop. 27 629–649 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose-Oji B., Lawrence A., Wong J., Lysinge R., Fraser P., Hall J., O’Connor H. and Healey J. 2002. Obtaining local values for biodiversity: protocols used by the ERP Mount Cameroon Project. Summarised case study. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRNEnvironmental Change Institute DFID and Tropenbos International.

  • Becker C.D., AgredaA., Astudillo E., Constantino M. and Torres P. 2005. Community-based surveys of fog capture and biodiversity monitoring at Loma AltaEcuador enhance social capital and institutional cooperation. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2695–2707.

  • Berger P.L. and Luckmann T. 1981. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

  • J. Bliss G. Aplet C. Hartzell P. Harwood P. Jahnige D. Kittredge S. Lewandowski M.L. Soscia (2001) ArticleTitleCommunity-based ecosystem monitoring J. Sustain. Forest. 12 143–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen F., Burgess N. and Balmford A. 2005. Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2507–2542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupar M. and Badenoch N. 2002. EnvironmentLivelihoods, and Local Institutions. Decentralisation in Mainland Southeast Asia. World Resources Institute, Washington DC, USA.

  • M. Estrella J. Gaventa (1998) Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: a literature review Institute of Development Studies Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Fisher (1995) Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development. Issues in forest conservation IUCN and WWF GlandSwitzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt I., Arevalo M. and Saladores K. 1998. Tracking change together. In: Arevalo M. et al. (eds),PLA Notes 31: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. IIED, London, UK, pp. 28–36.

  • IUCN 2003. 2003 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.redlist.org.

  • S.R. Kellert J.N. Mehta S.A. Ebbin L.L. Lichtenfeld (2000) ArticleTitleCommunity natural resource management: promises, rhetoric, and reality Soc. Nat. Resour. 13 705–715 Occurrence Handle10.1080/089419200750035575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A. 2002. The Art of Science: Background Paper for the ETFRN PAMEB Conference. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRNEnvironmental Change Institute DFID and Tropenbos International.

  • Lawrence A. and Elphick M. 2002. Summary report. In: Lawrence A. and Elphick M. (ed.), Policy Implications of Participatory Biodiversity Assessment. ETFRN International Seminar for Policy-Makers and Implementers, London, UK. ETFRN Environmental Change InstituteDFID and Tropenbos International.

  • Lawrence A. and van Rijsoort J. 2003. How should a participatory biodiversity assessment be conducted?. In: UNEP World Conservation and Monitoring Centre(ed.), Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring. Guidance for Practitioners. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.

  • M. Leach (2002) Plural perspectives and institutional dynamics: challenges for community forestry J.A.E. Oglethorpe (Eds) Adaptive Management: From Theory to Practice IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z.B., Zhao X.D., Yang S.Y., Shi X.C., Yang X.H., Ning B., Cheng B.R., Zhang S.Q., Zhang Y.B., Liu H.Z., Xia L. and Li A.P. 1999. Preliminary Integrated Management Plan of the provincial level Xiaoheishan Nature Reserve. Unpublished project report. Xiaoheishan Nature Reserve Management Office, Baoshan, Yunnan, P.R. China.

  • Y. Malhotra (2001) ArticleTitleExpert systems for knowledge management: crossing the chasm between information processing and sense making Expert Syst. Appl. 20 7–16 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00045-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijsoort J. and Zhang J. 2002. Development of participatory resources monitoring in two nature reserves in Yunnan, P.R. China. A case study. In: ETFRN (ed.), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). 7–25 January 2002. ETFRN, Environmental Change Institute, DFID and Tropenbos International.

  • J. van Rijsoort J. Zhang (In press) The development of a strategy for Participatory Resources Monitoring in Yunnan, P.R. China and its value for forest conservation and local needs A. Lawrence (Eds) Taking Stock of Nature Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • C.F. Sabel (1994) Learning by monitoring: the institutions of economic development N.J. Smelser R. Swedberg (Eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology Princeton Press and Russel Sage Foundation Princeton, NJ and New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Schanz (2002) ArticleTitleNational forest programmes as discursive institutions Forest Policy and Economics 4 269–279 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00077-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Sheil (2001) ArticleTitleConservation and biodiversity monitoring in the Tropics: realities, priorities, and distractions Conserv. Biol. 15 1179–1182 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041179.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum K.F. 1999. Normative pluriformity in forest management: professional and community perspectives. In: FAO et al. (eds),Pluralism and Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development. FAO, RomeItaly. 9–12 December 1997, pp. 365–380.

  • P.R. Wilshusen S.R. Brechin C.L. Fortwangler P.C. West (2002) ArticleTitleReinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation Soc. Nat. Resour. 15 17–40 Occurrence Handle10.1080/089419202317174002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong J., Healey J. and Phyllips O. 2002. Incorporating values into biodiversity assessment and monitoring – An introduction to some current issues. In: ETFRN (eds), Internet Conference on Participatory AssessmentMonitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB). ETFRN, Environmental Change Institute, DFID and Tropenbos International.

  • Xu J., Zuo T. and Yang Y. 2001. The Impact of Decentralisation and Local Participation on Upland Watersheds Management in Yunnan, China. A collaborative Project between Resources Policy Support Initiative (REPSI) and Centre for Biodiversity and Indigenous Knowledge (CBIK). Project document. Centre for Biodiversity and Indigenous Knowledge (CBIK), Kunming, P.R. China.

  • Zhuo P.Y., Qu L.S., Chang Z.J. and Peng H.F. 2000. Preliminary Integrated Management Plan of the Provincial level Tongbiguan Nature Reserve. Unpublished project document.Tongbiguan Nature Reserve Management Office, Mangshi, Yunnan, P.R. China.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeannette Van Rijsoort.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Rijsoort, J., Jinfeng, Z. Participatory Resource Monitoring as a Means for Promoting Social Change in Yunnan, China. Biodivers Conserv 14, 2543–2573 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8377-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-8377-y

Key words

Navigation