Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Bird and Small Mammal BACI and IG Design Studies in a Wind Farm in Malpica (Spain)

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Wind farms have shown a spectacular growth during the last 10 years. As far as we know, this study is the first where the relationship between wind power and birds and small mammals have been considered. Before–after control impact (BACI) study design to birds and Impact Gradient (IG) study design to small mammals to test the null hypothesis of no impact of a wind farm were used. In the BACI model Windfarm Area and a Reference Area were considered. Distance from turbines was considered in the IG model. Windfarm installations did not clearly affect bird and small mammal populations. Flight height of nesting and no nesting birds did not show a clear tendency. Small mammals populations suffered high variations in numbers through times by intrinsic population factors. There are many practical problems of detection of human influence on abundances of populations so sampling in the long run can be suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso C. 2002. Parque Natural de las Islas Atlánticas de Galicia. La fuerza del mar. Ambienta (http://hispagua.cedex.es).

  2. R. Anderson M. Morrison K. Sinclair D. Strickland (1999) Studying Wind Energy/Bird Interactions: A Guidance Document National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC) Washington

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.C. Blanco J.L. González (1992) Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España Colección Técnica ICONA Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.K. Chase W.B. Kristan SuffixIII A.J. Lynam M.V. Price J.T. Rotenberry (2000) ArticleTitleSingle species as indicators of species richness and composition in California coastal sage scrub birds and small mammals Conserv. Biol. 14 474–487 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98312.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dirksen S., Winden J.v.d. and Spaans A.L. 1998. Nocturnal collision risks of birds with wind turbines in tidal and semi-offshore areas. Wind Energy Landscape 99–107.

  6. Erickson W.P., Johnson G.D., Strickland M.D., Young D.P., Sernka K.J. and Good R.E. 2001. Avian Collisions with Wind Turbines: A Summary of Existing Studies and Comparisons to Other Sources of Avian Collision Mortality in the United States. National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC) Resource Document.

  7. C. Ferry B. Frochot (1958) ArticleTitleUne methode pour denombrer les oiseaux nicheurs Terra e Vie 105 IssueID2 85–102

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.H. Green (1979) Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologist John Wiley and Sons New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Guillemette J.K. Larsen (2002) ArticleTitlePostdevelopment experiments to detect anthropogenic disturbance: the case of Sea Ducks and Wind Park Ecol. Appl. 12 IssueID3 868–877

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guillemette M., Larsen J.K. and Clausager I. 1998. Impact Assessment of an Off-shore Wind Park on Sea Ducks. National Environmental Research Institute, Report number 227.

  11. S.H. Hurlbert (1984) ArticleTitlePseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments Ecol. Monogr. 54 IssueID2 187–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howell J.A. 1997. Avian Use and Mortality at the Sacramento Municipal Utility District Wind Energy Development Site, Montezuma Hills, Solano County, California. Sacramento Municipal Utility District, California.

  13. J.K. Larsen J. Madsen (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of wind turbines and other physical elements on field utilization by pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus): a landscape perspective Landscape Ecol. 15 755–764 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008127702944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K.L. Leddy K.F. Higgins D.E. Naugle (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of wind turbine on upland nesting birds in conservation reserve program grasslands Wilson Bull. 111 IssueID1 100–104

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.d. Lucas G. Janss M. Ferrer (2004) ArticleTitleThe effects of a wind farm on birds in a migration point: the Strait of Gibraltar Biodiv. Conserv. 13 395–407 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006507.22024.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.L. Morrison K. Sinclair (1998) Avian Risk and Fatality Protocol National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.J.M. Musters M.A.W. Noordervliet W.J. Terkeus (1996) ArticleTitleBird casualties caused by a wind energy project in an estuary Bird Study 43 124–126

    Google Scholar 

  18. Natural S.G.d.H. 1995a. Atlas de Vertebrados de Galicia. Tomo II: Aves. Santiago de Compostela.

  19. Natural S.G.d.H. 1995b. Atlas de Vertebrados Terrestres de Galicia. Tomo I: Peixes, Anfibios, Re´ ptiles e Mamı´ feros. Santiago de Compostela.

  20. Nelson H.K. and Curry R.C. 1995. Assessing avian interactions with windplant development and operation. Trans. 60th No. Am. Wildl. & Natur. Resour. Conf. 266–277.

  21. S. Orloff A. Flannery (1992) Wind Turbine Effects on Avian Activity, Habitat Useand Mortality in Altamont Pass and Solano County Wind Resource Areas California Energy Commission (CEC) California

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.L. Orrock J.F. Pagels W.J. McShea E.K. Harper (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting presence and abundance of a small mammal species: the effect of scale and resolution Ecol. Appl. 10 IssueID5 1356–1366

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.G. Osborn K.F. Higgins R.E. Usgaard C.D. Dieter R.D. Neiger (2000) ArticleTitleBird mortality associated with wind turbines at the buffalo ridge wind resource areaMinnesota Am. Midland Nat. 143 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Page D.S., Gilfillan E.S., Boehm P.D. and Harner E.J. 1993. Shoreline ecology program for Prince William Sound, Alaska, flowing the Exxon Valdez oil spill: Part 1- Study design and methods. DRAFT. Third Symposium on Environmental Toxicology and Risk: Aquatic Plant, and Terrestrial. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, PA.

  25. S. Rivas-Martínez (1987) La vegetación de España Universidad Alcalá Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  26. A.D. Rodewald R.H. Yahner (2001) ArticleTitleInfluence of landscape composition on avian community structure and associated mechanisms Ecology 82 IssueID12 3493–3504

    Google Scholar 

  27. D.P. Snyder (1978) Populations of small mammals under natural condition The University Pittsburgh 237

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stekoll M.S., Deyster L., Highsmith R.C., Saupe S.M., Guo Z., Erickson W.P., McDonald L. and Strickland D. 1993. Coastal Habitat Injury Assessment: Intertidal communities and the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Presented at the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium, February 2–5, 1993. Anchorage, Alaska.

  29. A. Stewart-Oaten (1986) The Before-After/Control-Impact-Pairs Design for Environmental Impact Assessment Marine Review Committee California

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Strickland G.D. Johnson W.P. Erickson S.A. Sarappo R.M. Halet (1998) Avian UseFlight Behaviorand Mortality on the Buffalo RidgeMinnesotaWind Resource Area National Avian - Wind Power Planning Meeting III San DiegoCalifornia

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tellerı´ a J.L. 1986. Manual para el Censo de los Vertebrados Terrestres. Madrid.

  32. Thelander C.G. and Rugge L. 1998. Bird Risk Behaviors and Fatalities at the Altamont Wind Resource Area. National Avian - Wind Power Planning Meeting III. San Diego, California.

  33. Thomas L., Laake J.L., Strindberg S., Marques F.F.C., Bochers D.L., Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burham K.P., Hedley S.L. and Pollard J.H. 2002. Distance 4.0 Beta 6. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment University of St. Andrews, UK. (http://www.ruwpa. stand.ac.uk/distance).

  34. A.J. Underwood (1994) ArticleTitleOn beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances Ecol. Appl. 4 IssueID1 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.E. Winkelman (1990) Bird collision victims in the experimental wind park near Oosterbierum (Fr), during building and partly operative situations (1986–1989) Instituut voor Bos- en Natuuronderzoek Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela de Lucas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Lucas, M., Janss, G. & Ferrer, M. A Bird and Small Mammal BACI and IG Design Studies in a Wind Farm in Malpica (Spain). Biodivers Conserv 14, 3289–3303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0447-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0447-z

Keywords

Navigation