Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exchange of biological control genetic resources in India: prospects and constraints for access and benefit sharing

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Nagoya Protocol for access and benefit sharing (ABS) attaches significance to India since the country exchanges classical biological control agents to manage invasive alien species. Classical biological control differs from commercial biological control in that it involves the use of co-evolved, host specific natural enemies from the host’s native region to control the host wherever invasive. The national Biological Diversity Act is responsible for implementing ABS in India. It stipulates the means for use of biological resources for various purposes including research and commerce. However, commercial use of bioresources as biological control agents is not included. ABS regulates the exchange of research results using biological resources and related intellectual property rights. India is yet to implement the Nagoya Protocol effectively due to certain gaps in the Biological Diversity Act concerning some of the key provisions in the protocol that need to be addressed. However, some examples of the application of ABS measures for export of biological resources are discussed here. For export of biological control agents from India, collaborative research with the recipient country is necessary and is governed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Multiplication of biological control agents for commercial use and release is governed by ABS regulations. For importation of biological control agents into India, the exporting country regulations apply, and the Plant Protection Advisor grants permission. To implement the Nagoya Protocol effectively in India, we recommend that: (1) user country policies include clauses that discourage misuse of biological resources, (2) the consent of local communities be sought before accessing biological resources instead of just ‘consulting’ them, (3) ABS provisions are clearly stated, including what is covered and what is not covered under the Biological Diversity Act, (4) ABS provisions be made more flexible to facilitate compliance, and (5) the roles and responsibilities of each agency involved in ABS implementation be clearly defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brahmi P, Choudhary V, Tyagi V (2021) An overview of framework and case studies related to ABS in plant genetic resources. Indian J Plant Genet Resour 34:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera MJ, Tvedt MW, Perron-Welch F, Jorem A, Phillips F-K (2013) The interface between Nagoya Protocol on ABS and the ITPGRFA at the international level: potential issues for consideration in supporting mutually supportive implementation at the national level.https://www.fni.no/getfile.php/131657-1469868920/Filer/Publikasjoner/FNI-R0113.pdf

  • Claudio C (2008) The question of minimum standards of access and benefit-sharing under the CBD international regime: lessons from the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Asian Biotech Dev Rev 10:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 55:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2008) Report of the meeting of the group of legal and technical experts on concepts, terms, working definitions and sectoral approaches. https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/abs/abswg-07/official/abswg-07-02-en.pdf. Accessed 16 November 2022

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2022a) The convention on biological diversity. https://cbd.int/convention. Accessed 15 Nov 2022

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2022b) Access and benefit sharing clearing house. Country records India. http://absch.cbd.int/search/nationalRecords. Accessed on 15 Oct 2022

  • Ellison CA, Pollard KM, Varia S (2020) Potential of a coevolved rust fungus for the management of Himalayan balsam in the British Isles: first field releases. Weed Res 60:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garforth K, Frison C (2007) Key issues for the relationship between the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Occasional Paper No. 2. Quaker International Affairs Programme, Ottawa, Canada. https://biogov.uclouvain.be/staff/frison/OP2-Final_000.pdf

  • Goeden RD (1978) Biological control of weeds Part II. In: Clausen CP (ed) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. Agriculture Handbook 480, Agriculture Research Service, USDA, Washington DC, USA, pp 357- 414

  • Halewood M, Andrieux E, Crisson L, Gapusi JR, Mulumba JW, Koffi EK, Dorji TY, Bhatta MR, Balma D (2013) Implementing ‘Mutually Supportive’ access and benefit sharing mechanisms under the Plant Treaty, Convention on Biological Diversity, and Nagoya Protocol, 9/1 Law, Environment and Development Journal, p. 68, http://www.lead-journal.org/content/13068.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2022

  • Heimpel GE, Mills NJ (2017) Biological control. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEEP, Ecologic and GHK (2012) Study to analyse legal and economic aspects of implementing the Nagoya Protocol on ABS in the European Union. Executive Summary of the Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels and London http://minisites.ieep.eu/assets/1225/ABS_executive_summary.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2022

  • ITPGRFA (2022) International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. https://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/areas-of-work/farmers-rights/en/. Accessed 12 October 2022

  • Mason PG, Barratt BIP, Mc Kay F, Klapwijk JN, Silvestri L, Hill M, Hinz HL, Sheppard A, Brodeur J, Diniz Vitorino M, Weyl P, Hoelmer KA (2023) Impact of access and benefit-sharing implementation on biological control genetic resources. BioControl, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10176-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Biodiversity Authority (2014) Guidelines for international collaboration research projects involving transfer or exchange of biological resources or information relating thereto between institutions including government sponsored institutions and such institutions in other countries. http://nbaindia.org/uploaded/pdf/notification/7%20%20collaborative%20guidelines.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2022

  • National Biodiversity Authority (2022a) The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and Biological Diversity Rules, 2004, National Biodiversity Authority (2004). http://nbaindia.org/uploaded/act/BDACT_ENG.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2022

  • National Biodiversity Authority (2022b) Compendium of Biological Diversity Act 2002, Rules 2004 & Notifications. http://nbaindia.org/content/18/21/1/notifications.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2022

  • National Biodiversity Authority (2022c) Guidelines on access to biological resources and associated knowledge and benefits sharing regulations, 2014. http://nbaindia.org/uploaded/pdf/Gazette_Notification_of_ABS_Guidlines.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2022

  • National Biodiversity Authority (2022d) Access and benefit sharing experiences from India. http://nbaindia.org/uploaded/pdf/ABS_Factsheets_1.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2022

  • Nijar GS (2011) Food security and access and benefit sharing laws relating to genetic resources: promoting synergies in national and international governance. Int Environ Agreements 11:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nlsabs (2022) Biodiversity and access and benefit sharing in India https://abs.nls.ac.in/?page_id=219. Accessed 15 November 2022

  • Pisupati B (2015) Access and benefit sharing: issues and experiences from India. Jindal Global Law Review 6(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran KV, Suresh TA (2013) Evaluation of classical biological control of Mikania micrantha with Puccinia spegazzinii. KFRI Research Report No. 472, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India

  • Sankaran KV, Puzari, KC, Ellison CA, Kumar PS, Dev U (2008) Field release of the rust fungus Puccinia spegazzinii to control Mikania micrantha in India: protocols and raising awareness. In: Julien MH, Sforza R, Bon MC, Evans HC, Hatcher PE, Hinz HL, Rector BG (eds), Proceedings of the XII international symposium on biological control of weeds, Montpellier, France, 22–27 April 2007. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 384–389

  • Sankaran T (1973) Biological control of weeds in India: a review of introductions and current investigations of natural enemies. In: Dunn PH (ed) Proceedings of the second international symposium on biological control of weeds, Rome, Italy, 4–7 October 1971, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK, pp 82–88

  • Singh SP (2001) Biological control of invasive weeds in India. In: Sankaran KV, Murphy ST, Evans HC (eds) Alien weeds in moist tropical zones. Proceedings of a workshop, 2–4 November 2001, Kerala, India, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and CABI Bioscience, UK, pp 11–19

  • Sreerama Kumar P, Sreedevi K, Amala U, Gupta A, Verghese A (2022) Shipment of insects and related arthropods into and out of India for research or commercial purposes. Rev Scie Tech/Off Int Des Epizooties 41(1):158–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G, Moreno SP, Åhrén M, Carrasco JN, Kamau EC, Medaglia JC, Oliva MJ and Perron-Welch F, Ali N, China W (2012) An explanatory guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 83, https://doc1.bibliothek.li/abd/FLM9151088.pdf Accessed 2 November 2022

  • Tryon H (1910) The ‘wild cochineal insect’, with reference to its injurious action on prickly pear (Opuntia spp.) in India, etc., and to its availability for the subjugation of this plant in Queensland and elsewhere. Queensland Agric J 25:188–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt MW (2014) Beyond Nagoya: towards a legally functional system of access and benefit-sharing. In: Oberthur S, Rosendal GK (eds) Global governance of genetic resources access and benefit sharing after the Nagoya Protocol. Routledge, UK, pp 158–177

  • Winston RL, Schwarzlander M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, and Julien MH (2023) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. Based on FHTET-2014–04, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team. https://www.ibiocontrol.org/catalog/. Accessed 27 Feb 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr ST Murphy, CABI Bioscience, UK Centre, Egham and the two anonymous reviewers for useful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Dr R Suganthasakthivel, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India and Dr Keerthy Vijayan for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India

    Kavita Gupta

  2. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Thrissur, India

    K. V. Sankaran

  3. Indian Council of Agricultural Research- National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, India

    P. Sreerama Kumar

Authors
  1. Kavita Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. V. Sankaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Sreerama Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Sankaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There were no potential conflicts of interest between the authors while preparing this paper.

Human and animal rights

Humans or animals were not involved in this research.

Consent for publications

Consent of all the authors were taken before submitting this paper.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Peter Mason

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, K., Sankaran, K.V. & Kumar, P.S. Exchange of biological control genetic resources in India: prospects and constraints for access and benefit sharing. BioControl 68, 281–289 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10199-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10199-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation