Skip to main content
Log in

Competition is the mechanism of biocontrol of brown rot in stone fruit by Penicillium frequentans

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanism of biocontrol of brown rot in stone fruit by Penicillium frequentans Westling (Pf909) was investigated using in vitro and in vivo growth assays and a benomyl-resistant strain of Monilinia fructicola (G Winter) Honey (Mf3C). For the in vitro assays, Pf909 and Mf3C conidia were suspended in Czapek-Dox broth, which was amended or not amended with a skin extract of mature peaches. The growth and germination of Pf909 and Mf3C conidia were determined by counting the number of colony-forming units on potato dextrose agar plates, which were amended or not amended with 0.5 g ml−1 benomyl. In some of the assays, germinated Pf909 conidia were used before their exposure to Mf3C conidia. For the in vivo assays, healthy cherries were inoculated with Mf3C conidia before and after applying Pf909 conidia on the cherry surface and the incidence of brown rot was recorded for seven days. Since we found that Pf909 conidia compete with Mf3C conidia for space and nutrients in the different assays, we concluded that competition is the probable primary mechanism of biocontrol of Pf909.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdee SR, Pfender WF, Hartnett DC (1990) Competition between Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Septoria nodorum in the wheat leaf as measured with de Wit replacement series. Phytopathology 80:1177–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeman JP, Fokkema NJ (1982) Potential for biological control of plant diseases on the phylloplane. Ann Rev Phytopathology 20:167–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie IDS, Blakeman JP (1976) Competition for exogenous substrates in vitro by leaf surface micro-organisms and germination of conidia of Botrytis cinerea. Physiol Plant Pathol 9:227–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CL, Madden LV (1990) Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cal A, M-Sagasta E, Melgarejo P (1988) Antifungal substances produced by Penicillium frequentans and their relationship to the biocontrol of Monilinia laxa. Phytopathology 78:888–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cal A, Mateo-Sagasta E, Melgarejo P (1990) Biological control of peach twig blight (Monilinia laxa) with Penicillium frequentans. Plant Pathol 39:612–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cal A, Pascual S, Melgarejo P (1994) In vitro studies on the effects of fungicides on beneficial fungi of peach twig mycoflora. Mycopathologia 126:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cal A, Larena I, Guijarro B, Melgarejo P (2002) Solid state fermentation to produce conidia of Penicillium frequentans, a biocontrol agent against brown rot on stone fruits. Biocontrol Sci Technol 12:715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cal A, Larena I, Guijarro B, Melgarejo P (2012) Use of biofungicides for controlling plant diseases to improve food availability. Agriculture 2:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan HK, Leveau JHJ (2015) Artificial surfaces in phyllosphere microbiology. Phytopathology 105:1036–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guijarro B, Larena I, Melgarejo P, De Cal A (2006) Effect of drying on conidial viability of Penicilllium frequentans, a biological control agent against peach brown rot disease caused by Monilinia spp. Biocontrol Sci Tecnol 16:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guijarro B, Melgarejo P, Torres R, Lamarca N, Usall J, De Cal A (2007) Effect of different biological formulations of Penicillium frequentans on brown rot of peach. Biol Control 42:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guijarro B, Melgarejo P, Torres R, Lamarca N, Usall J, De Cal A (2008) Penicillium frequentans population dynamics on peach surfaces after its application against brown rot in orchards. J Appl Microbiol 104:659–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hjeljord LG, Tronsmo A (2003) Effect of germination initiation on competitive capacity of Trichoderma atroviride P1 conidia. Phytopathology 93:1593–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KB, Dileone JA (1999) Effect of antibiosis on antagonist dose-plant disease response relationships for the biological control of crown gall of tomato and cherry. Phytopathology 89:974–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Köhl J, Lombaers-van der Plas CH, Molhoek WML, Kessel GJT, Goossen-van der Geijn HM (1999) Competitive ability of the antagonist Ulocladium atrum at temperatures favourable for Botrytis spp. development. BioControl 44:329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin RP, Fravel DR (1999) Mechanisms of action and dose response relationships governing biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by nonpathogenic Fusarium spp. Phytopathol 89:1152–1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinuz A, Schouten A, Sikora RA (2012) Systemically induced resistance and microbial competitive exclusion: implications on biological control. Phytopathology 102:260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo P, M-Sagasta E (1984) Fungal antagonism in relation to peaches. In: Woodbine M (ed) Antimicrobials and agriculture. Butterworths, London, pp 127–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo P, Carrillo R, Sagasta EM (1985) Mycoflora of peach twigs and flowers and its possible significance in biological control of Monilinia laxa. Trans Br Mycol Soc 85:313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgarejo P, Carrillo R, Sagasta EM (1986) Potential for biological control of Monilinia laxa in peach twigs. Crop Prot 5:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos E, Bonaterra A (1996) Dose-response models in biological control of plant pathogen: an empirical verification. Phytopathology 86:464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton MR, Kinkel LL, Leonard KJ (1998) Determinants of density- and frequency-dependent fitness in competing plant pathogens ecology and population biology. Phytopathology 88:45–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pal KK, Gardener BM (2006) Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health Instr. doi:10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer DB, Burroughs R (1986) Disinfection of seed surfaces with sodium hypochlorite. Phytopathology 76:745–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shams-Ghahfarokhi M, Kalantari S, Razzaghi-Abyaneh M (2013) Terrestrial bacteria from agricultural soils: versatile weapons against aflatoxigenic fungi. In: Razzaghi-Abyaneh M (ed) Aflatoxins – recent advances and future prospects. InTech, Rijeka, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikora RA, Schäfer K, Dababat AA (2007) Modes of action associated with microbially induced in planta suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes. Australas Plant Pathol 36(2):124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilanick JL, Denis-Arrue R, Bosch JR, Gonzalez AR, Henson D, Janisiewicz WJ (1993) Control of postharvest brown rot of nectarines and peaches by Pseudomonas species. Crop Prot 12:513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Spadaro D, Gullino ML (2004) State of the art and future prospects of the biological control of postharvest fruit diseases. Int J Food Microbiol 91:185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villarino M, Melgarejo P, De Cal A (2016) Growth and aggressiveness factors affecting Monilinia spp. survival peaches. Int J Food Microbiol 227:6–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XM, Jeger MJ (2013) Combined use of two biocontrol agents with different biocontrol mechanisms most likely results in less than expected efficacy in controlling foliar pathogens under fluctuating conditions: a modeling study. Phytopathology 103:108–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with financial support from BIOCOMES project (EU FP7 612713). We wish to thank to Y. Herranz and R. Castillo for technical support. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Arieh Bomzon, Consul Write (http://www.consulwrite.com).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonieta De Cal.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Monica Hofte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guijarro, B., Hernandez-Escribano, L., Larena, I. et al. Competition is the mechanism of biocontrol of brown rot in stone fruit by Penicillium frequentans . BioControl 62, 557–566 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9808-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9808-x

Keywords

Navigation