Abstract
Several building codes propose methodologies to account for epistemic uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by selecting a knowledge level and reducing material strengths by means of the associated value of the confidence factor. Previous works showed that, in the case of masonry structures, this approach has various limitations, such as the lack of proper consideration of experimental tests performed. This article focuses on the issue of imperfect knowledge on material properties of existing masonry buildings and proposes a probabilistic methodology for the assessment, based on Bayesian updating of mechanical properties. The use of a Bayesian approach allows to update the values of the material properties assumed a priori as knowledge on the building increases, by taking into account all the experimental information gathered during the assessment process. A large number of simulated assessments is carried out and the values of the confidence factors on material properties are defined through the comparison between the obtained results and those of the reference structure, assumed to be perfectly known. These factors are useful in a more general framework for the assessment of masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang AH-S, Tang WH (2006) Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications in civil and environmental engineering. Wiley, Hoboken
Augenti N, Parisi F, Acconcia E (2012) MADA: online experimental database for mechanical modelling of existing masonry assemblages. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal
Beck JL, Au SK (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech-ASCE 128(4):380–391
Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. Part I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech-ASCE 124(4):455–461
Binda L, Saisi A, Tiraboschi C (2000) Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries. J Constr Build Mater 14:199–233
Borri A, Corradi M, Castori G, De Maria A (2015a) A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bull Earthq Eng 13(9):2647–2665
Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M (2015b) Determination of shear strength of masonry panels through different tests. Int J Archit Herit 9(8):913–927
Bosiljkov V, Totoev Y, Nichols J (2005) Shear modulus and stiffness of brickwork masonry: an experimental perspective. Struct Eng Mech 20(1):21–43
Bracchi S, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2015a) Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach. Bull Earthq Eng 13(11):3423–3448
Bracchi S, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2015b) Definition of mechanical properties of existing masonry accounting for experimental knowledge by Bayesian updating. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete Island, Greece
Brozovič M, Dolšek M (2014) Envelope-based pushover analysis procedure for the approximate seismic response analysis of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(1):77–96
Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Bosiljkov V, D’Ayala D (2015) Sensitivity analysis for setting up the investigation protocol and defining proper confidence factors for masonry buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 13(1):129–151
Chiostrini S, Galano L, Vignoli A (2003) In situ shear and compression tests in ancient stone masonry walls of Tuscany, Italy. J Test Eval 31(4):1–15
CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (2014) Istruzioni per la valutazione affidabilistica della sicurezza sismica di edifici esistenti. CNR-DT 212/2013 (in Italian)
Corigliano M, Lai CG, Rota M, Strobbia CL (2012) ASCONA: automated selection of compatible natural accelerograms. Earthq Spectra 28(3):965–987
Costa AA, Penna A, Magenes G (2011) Seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry: from experimental testing of the in-plane capacity of walls to building response simulation. J Earthq Eng 15(1):1–31
Diamantidis D (ed) (2001) Probabilistic Assessment of Existing Structures. JCSS Report 032, pp 176
Drysdale RG, Hamid AA, Baker LR (1999) Masonry structures. Behavior and design. The Masonry Society, Boulder
EN 1998–1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Bruxelles
EN 1998–3 (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN, Bruxelles
Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592
Fajfar P, Marusic D, Perus I (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. J Earthq Eng 9(6):831–854
Franchin P, Pinto PE, Rajeev P (2010) Confidence factor? J Earthq Eng 14(7):989–1007
Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A (2006) On the Use of Pushover Analysis for Existing Masonry Buildings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland; ISBN-10:2-8399-0190-0
Gardoni P, Der Kiureghian A, Mosalam KM (2002) Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. J Eng Mech-ASCE 128(10):1024–1038
Geyskens P, Der Kiureghian A, Monteiro P (1998) Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of concrete. J Struct Eng-ASCE 124(1):89–95
Giannini R, Sguerri L, Paolacci F, Alessandri S (2014) Assessment of concrete strength combining direct and NDT measures via Bayesian inference. Eng Struct 64:68–77
Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81:23–69
Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):339–362
Jalayer F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures. Struct Saf 32(3):220–228
Jalayer F, Elefante L, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2011) Knowledge-based performance assessment of existing RC buildings. J Earthq Eng 15(3):362–389
Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2012) The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):695–715
Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799
Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A, Rota M (2010) Experimental characterization of stone masonry mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of 8th International Masonry Conference, Dresden, Germany
Marsaglia G (2006) Ratios of normal variables. J Stat Softw 16(4):1–10
MIT Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation (2009) Circ. C.S.Ll.Pp. No. 617 of 2/2/2009 “Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008,” Consiglio superiore dei lavori pubblici. S.O. n.27 alla G.U. del 26.02.2009, No. 47, 2009 (in Italian)
Monti G, Alessandri S (2009) Application of Bayesian techniques to material strength evaluation and calibration of confidence factors. In: Proceedings of the Reluis Research Project Final Workshop, Naples, Italy
Monti G, Goretti A, Quaranta G, Marano GC (2014) Gestione delle incertezze nell’analisi del comportamento sismico di strutture esistenti in c.a. attraverso l’uso di modelli numerici. Report of the RELUIS Special Project RS11 “Treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of existing buildings” (in Italian)
Mouyiannou A, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) Identification of suitable limit states from nonlinear dynamic analyses of masonry structures. J Earthq Eng 18(2):231–263
MPW Ministry for Public Works (1981) Circ. No. 21745 of 30/7/1981 “Istruzioni relative alla normativa tecnica per la riparazione ed il rafforzamento degli edifici in muratura danneggiati dal sisma”, Legge 14 Maggio 1981, n. 219, Art. 10 (in Italian)
NTC (2008) Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008: “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni,” Ministero delle Infrastrutture. S.O. n.30 alla G.U. del 4.2.2008, No. 29 (in Italian)
Papadimitriou C, Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (2001) Updating robust reliability using structural test data. Probab Eng Mech 16(2):103–113
Penna A (2015) Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies. Bull Earthq Eng 13(4):1051–1071
Penna A, Rota M, Mouyiannou A, Magenes G (2013) Issues on the use of time-history analysis for the design and assessment of masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece
Penna A, Lagomarsino S, Galasco A (2014) A nonlinear macro-element model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(2):159–179
Ramos LF, Miranda T, Mishra M, Fernandes FM, Manning E (2015) A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: the Saint Torcato church case study. Eng Struct 84:120–129
Robert CP (2001) The Bayesian choice, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Romão X, Gonçalves R, Costa A, Delgado R (2012) Evaluation of the EC8-3 confidence factors for the characterization of concrete strength in existing structures. Mater Struct 45(11):1737–1758
Rosti A, Penna A, Rota M, Magenes G (2016) In-plane seismic response of low-density AAC URM walls. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-016-0825-5
Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 32(5):1312–1323
Rota M, Zuccolo E, Taverna L, Corigliano M, Lai CG, Penna A (2012) Mesozonation of the Italian territory for the definition of real spectrum-compatible accelerograms. Bull Earthq Eng 10(5):1357–1375
Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) A framework for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings taking into account different sources of uncertainty. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(7):1045–1066
Sahlin S (1971) Structural masonry. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Silva B, Dalla Benetta M, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (2014) Compression and sonic tests to assess effectiveness of grout injection on three-leaf stone masonry walls. Int J Arch Herit 8(3):408–435
Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1998) Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. J Struct Eng 124(8):922–929
Tondelli M, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2012) Evaluation of uncertainties in the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings. J Earthq Eng 16(S1):36–64
Acknowledgments
This work was mainly carried out within different EUCENTRE Executive Projects in the years 2009–2014, funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Prof. Federico Bassetti, who greatly helped in the mathematical derivation of the methodology, Marco Tondelli and Giulia Grecchi, who contributed to the initial phases of the work. Finally, the manuscript has significantly benefited from the very useful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Magenes, G. et al. Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 2273–2297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8