Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several building codes propose methodologies to account for epistemic uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by selecting a knowledge level and reducing material strengths by means of the associated value of the confidence factor. Previous works showed that, in the case of masonry structures, this approach has various limitations, such as the lack of proper consideration of experimental tests performed. This article focuses on the issue of imperfect knowledge on material properties of existing masonry buildings and proposes a probabilistic methodology for the assessment, based on Bayesian updating of mechanical properties. The use of a Bayesian approach allows to update the values of the material properties assumed a priori as knowledge on the building increases, by taking into account all the experimental information gathered during the assessment process. A large number of simulated assessments is carried out and the values of the confidence factors on material properties are defined through the comparison between the obtained results and those of the reference structure, assumed to be perfectly known. These factors are useful in a more general framework for the assessment of masonry buildings accounting for different sources of uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang AH-S, Tang WH (2006) Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications in civil and environmental engineering. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Augenti N, Parisi F, Acconcia E (2012) MADA: online experimental database for mechanical modelling of existing masonry assemblages. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Beck JL, Au SK (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Eng Mech-ASCE 128(4):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (1998) Updating models and their uncertainties. Part I: Bayesian statistical framework. J Eng Mech-ASCE 124(4):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binda L, Saisi A, Tiraboschi C (2000) Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries. J Constr Build Mater 14:199–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Corradi M, Castori G, De Maria A (2015a) A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bull Earthq Eng 13(9):2647–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M (2015b) Determination of shear strength of masonry panels through different tests. Int J Archit Herit 9(8):913–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosiljkov V, Totoev Y, Nichols J (2005) Shear modulus and stiffness of brickwork masonry: an experimental perspective. Struct Eng Mech 20(1):21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracchi S, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2015a) Consideration of modelling uncertainties in the seismic assessment of masonry buildings by equivalent-frame approach. Bull Earthq Eng 13(11):3423–3448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracchi S, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2015b) Definition of mechanical properties of existing masonry accounting for experimental knowledge by Bayesian updating. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete Island, Greece

  • Brozovič M, Dolšek M (2014) Envelope-based pushover analysis procedure for the approximate seismic response analysis of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(1):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Bosiljkov V, D’Ayala D (2015) Sensitivity analysis for setting up the investigation protocol and defining proper confidence factors for masonry buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 13(1):129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiostrini S, Galano L, Vignoli A (2003) In situ shear and compression tests in ancient stone masonry walls of Tuscany, Italy. J Test Eval 31(4):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (2014) Istruzioni per la valutazione affidabilistica della sicurezza sismica di edifici esistenti. CNR-DT 212/2013 (in Italian)

  • Corigliano M, Lai CG, Rota M, Strobbia CL (2012) ASCONA: automated selection of compatible natural accelerograms. Earthq Spectra 28(3):965–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AA, Penna A, Magenes G (2011) Seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry: from experimental testing of the in-plane capacity of walls to building response simulation. J Earthq Eng 15(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantidis D (ed) (2001) Probabilistic Assessment of Existing Structures. JCSS Report 032, pp 176

  • Drysdale RG, Hamid AA, Baker LR (1999) Masonry structures. Behavior and design. The Masonry Society, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998–1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998–3 (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P, Marusic D, Perus I (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. J Earthq Eng 9(6):831–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchin P, Pinto PE, Rajeev P (2010) Confidence factor? J Earthq Eng 14(7):989–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galasco A, Lagomarsino S, Penna A (2006) On the Use of Pushover Analysis for Existing Masonry Buildings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland; ISBN-10:2-8399-0190-0

  • Gardoni P, Der Kiureghian A, Mosalam KM (2002) Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. J Eng Mech-ASCE 128(10):1024–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens P, Der Kiureghian A, Monteiro P (1998) Bayesian prediction of elastic modulus of concrete. J Struct Eng-ASCE 124(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannini R, Sguerri L, Paolacci F, Alessandri S (2014) Assessment of concrete strength combining direct and NDT measures via Bayesian inference. Eng Struct 64:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81:23–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):339–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalayer F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures. Struct Saf 32(3):220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalayer F, Elefante L, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2011) Knowledge-based performance assessment of existing RC buildings. J Earthq Eng 15(3):362–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2012) The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):695–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Penna A, Galasco A, Cattari S (2013) TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng Struct 56:1787–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G, Penna A, Galasco A, Rota M (2010) Experimental characterization of stone masonry mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of 8th International Masonry Conference, Dresden, Germany

  • Marsaglia G (2006) Ratios of normal variables. J Stat Softw 16(4):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportation (2009) Circ. C.S.Ll.Pp. No. 617 of 2/2/2009 “Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008,” Consiglio superiore dei lavori pubblici. S.O. n.27 alla G.U. del 26.02.2009, No. 47, 2009 (in Italian)

  • Monti G, Alessandri S (2009) Application of Bayesian techniques to material strength evaluation and calibration of confidence factors. In: Proceedings of the Reluis Research Project Final Workshop, Naples, Italy

  • Monti G, Goretti A, Quaranta G, Marano GC (2014) Gestione delle incertezze nell’analisi del comportamento sismico di strutture esistenti in c.a. attraverso l’uso di modelli numerici. Report of the RELUIS Special Project RS11 “Treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of existing buildings” (in Italian)

  • Mouyiannou A, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) Identification of suitable limit states from nonlinear dynamic analyses of masonry structures. J Earthq Eng 18(2):231–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MPW Ministry for Public Works (1981) Circ. No. 21745 of 30/7/1981 “Istruzioni relative alla normativa tecnica per la riparazione ed il rafforzamento degli edifici in muratura danneggiati dal sisma”, Legge 14 Maggio 1981, n. 219, Art. 10 (in Italian)

  • NTC (2008) Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008: “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni,” Ministero delle Infrastrutture. S.O. n.30 alla G.U. del 4.2.2008, No. 29 (in Italian)

  • Papadimitriou C, Beck JL, Katafygiotis LS (2001) Updating robust reliability using structural test data. Probab Eng Mech 16(2):103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penna A (2015) Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies. Bull Earthq Eng 13(4):1051–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penna A, Rota M, Mouyiannou A, Magenes G (2013) Issues on the use of time-history analysis for the design and assessment of masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece

  • Penna A, Lagomarsino S, Galasco A (2014) A nonlinear macro-element model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(2):159–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos LF, Miranda T, Mishra M, Fernandes FM, Manning E (2015) A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: the Saint Torcato church case study. Eng Struct 84:120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP (2001) The Bayesian choice, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Romão X, Gonçalves R, Costa A, Delgado R (2012) Evaluation of the EC8-3 confidence factors for the characterization of concrete strength in existing structures. Mater Struct 45(11):1737–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosti A, Penna A, Rota M, Magenes G (2016) In-plane seismic response of low-density AAC URM walls. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-016-0825-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 32(5):1312–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rota M, Zuccolo E, Taverna L, Corigliano M, Lai CG, Penna A (2012) Mesozonation of the Italian territory for the definition of real spectrum-compatible accelerograms. Bull Earthq Eng 10(5):1357–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2014) A framework for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings taking into account different sources of uncertainty. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(7):1045–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin S (1971) Structural masonry. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva B, Dalla Benetta M, da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (2014) Compression and sonic tests to assess effectiveness of grout injection on three-leaf stone masonry walls. Int J Arch Herit 8(3):408–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1998) Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. J Struct Eng 124(8):922–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondelli M, Rota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2012) Evaluation of uncertainties in the seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings. J Earthq Eng 16(S1):36–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was mainly carried out within different EUCENTRE Executive Projects in the years 2009–2014, funded by the Italian Department of Civil Protection. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Prof. Federico Bassetti, who greatly helped in the mathematical derivation of the methodology, Marco Tondelli and Giulia Grecchi, who contributed to the initial phases of the work. Finally, the manuscript has significantly benefited from the very useful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bracchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Magenes, G. et al. Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 2273–2297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8

Keywords

Navigation