Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of explosive compaction (EC) for liquefaction mitigation using CPT records

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Explosive compaction (EC) or Blast densification (BD) has been realized as an efficient technique for soil improvement and mitigation of the liquefaction potential in loose saturated sands. Due to providing continuous and precise records, Piezocone (CPTu) is the most applicable in situ test in geotechnical practice for evaluation of liquefaction potential. In this research a data bank including eight case histories in different locations has been compiled for investigation of EC effects on mitigation of loose sands instability. The sites geomaterials are in the category of fine to medium sand, silty sand and mixture of sand and gravel with relative density between 30 and 60 % and thickness of 5–40 m. Four CPT-based criteria have been used including cyclic stress ratio approach, cone tip resistance (qc) variations before and after modification, Qtn and qc1N, and soil behavior classification charts. Analyses have shown that due to EC the state of soil changes from loose to dense, the contractive behavior of sands changes to dilative, and the liquefaction potential diminishes. Also, by using soil behavior classification charts pre and post explosion, it can be observed that improved soils are not in the liquefiable zone, anymore. This improvement has a significant effect on layers where located in deeper zones, whereas in surface layers in some cases, liquefaction phenomenon has been observed. Moreover, by blasting in two stages between first and phases for boreholes, liquefaction potential decreases significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campanella RG, Kokan M (1993) A new approach to measuring dilatancy in saturated sands. ASTM Geotech Test J 16(6):485–495

  • Campanella RG, Robertson PK, Gillespie D (1986) Seismic cone penetration test. In: Proceeding of in situ 86, ASCE specialty conference, Blacking, Virginia, pp 116–130

  • Charlie WA, Veyera GE, Abt SR (1985) Predicting blast induced pore-water pressure increases in soils. Civ Eng Pract Des Eng 43:311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas BJ, Olsen RS (1981) Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer. In: Symposium on cone penetration testing and experience, ASCE, Geotechnical Engineering Division, St. Louis, pp 209–227

  • Dowding CH, Hryciw RD (1986) A laboratory study of blast densification. J Geotech Eng 112:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami A, Fellenius BH (2004) CPT and CPTu data for soil profile interpretation: review of methods and a proposed new approach. Iran J Sci Technol Trans B 28(B1):69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami A, Mollabasi H, Tabatabaee P (2014) A polynomial model for predicting liquefaction potential from cone penetration test data. Sci Iran 21(1):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi S, Dey A, Selvam S (1999) Densification of pond ash by blasting. J Geotech. Geoeinviron Eng 125:889–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohl WB, Jefferies MG, Howie JA, Digge D (2000) Explosive compaction: design, implementation and effectiveness J Geotech 50(6):657–667

  • Hachey JE, Plum RL, Byrne J, Kilian AP, Jenkins DV (1994) Blast densification of a thick, loose debris flow at Mt. St. Helen’s, Washington. In: Proceedings, vertical and horizontal deformations of foundations and embankments, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 40, pp 502–512

  • Hausmann MR (1990) Engineering principles of ground modification. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Yoshimine M (1992) Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils Found J 32(1):173–188

  • Ivanov PL (1967) Compaction of noncohesive soils by explosions (translated from Russian). National Technical Information Service Report No TT70-57221. US Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA, 211 pp

  • Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuko F, Yasuda S (1978) A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on microzonation, San Francisco, pp 885–896

  • Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on microzonation, Seattle, pp 1319–1330

  • Jefferies MG, Davies MO (1991) Soil classification by the cone penetration test: discussion. Can Geotech J 28(1):173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minaev OP (1993) Effective compaction of water-saturated soils by blasting translated from Russian. Osnovaniya Fundamenty Mekhanika Gruntov 30(2):17–19

  • Moseley MP, Kirsch K (eds) (2004) Ground improvement. CRC Press

  • Murray P, Singh NK, Huber F, Siu D (2006) Explosive compaction for the seymour falls dam seismic upgrade. In: Proceedings on the 59th Canadian geotechnical conference

  • Narin WA (1997) Investigation of the mechanisms and predictive methodologies for explosive compaction. In: Civil and environmental engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif

  • Narin WA, Mitchell JK (1994) Soil improvement by blasting. J Explos Eng 12(3):34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Narsilio GA, Carlos Santamarina J, Hebeler T, Bachus R (2009) Blast densification: multi-instrumented case history. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(6):723–734

  • Robertson PK (1990) Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 27(1):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Gillespie D, Grieg J (1986) Use of piezometer cone data. In: Clemence S (ed) Proceedings of American society of civil engineers, ASCE, In-Situ 86 Specialty Conference, Geotechnical Special Publication GSP No. 6, Blacksburg, 23–25 June, pp 1263–1280

  • Robertson PK (2012) Interpretation of in situ tests—some insights. In: Mayne PW, Coutinho RQ (eds) Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35:442–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, De Alba P (1986) Use of SPT and CPT test for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of soils. Proceedings of the insitu. ASCE

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluation soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 107(SM9):1249–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakeran M, Farhadi Nasl H, Eslami A (2012) A performance measurement of deep soil improvement in problematic soils by CPT and CPTu results. In: 9th international congress on civil engineering, May 8–10, 2012. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

  • Sladen JA, Hewitt KJ (1988) Influence of placement method on the in situ density of hydraulic sand fills. Can Geotech J 22:564–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymar ZV (1984) Compaction of alluvial sands by deep blasting. Can Geotech J 21:305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymar ZV, Ioabachie BC, Gupta RC, Williams LR (1984) Earth foundation treatment at Jebba dam site. Geotech Eng J ASCE 110(10):1415–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Liam Finn WD, Harder Jr LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson III WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe II KH (2001) Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(10):336–449

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Abolfazl Eslami

Authors
  1. Abolfazl Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Eslami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eslami, A. Investigation of explosive compaction (EC) for liquefaction mitigation using CPT records. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 3239–3257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9776-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9776-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation