Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality Instances and the Structure of the Concrete Particular

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I examine a puzzle that emerges from what J. P. Moreland has called the traditional realist view of quality instances. Briefly put, the puzzle is to figure out how quality instances fit into the overall structure of a concrete particular, given that the traditional realist view of quality instances prima facie seems incompatible with what might be called the traditional realist view of concrete particulars. After having discussed the traditional realist views involved and the puzzle that emerges from their juxtaposition, I propose an alternative realist view of quality instances which resolves the puzzle. In short, the puzzle is solved by treating the distinction between a concrete particular and its quality instances as a distinction of reason, and by adopting the view that the individuating element of a concrete particular must also serve as its unifying element – a view which Moreland, one of traditional realism’s most stalwart contemporary defenders, rejects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. I. Aaron (1952) The Theory of Universals Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • E. B. Allaire (1963) ‘Existence, Independence, and Universals’ E. B. Allaire (Eds) Iowa Publications in Ontology, Vol. 1. Essays in Ontology Martinus Nijhoff The Hague 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • E. B. Allaire (1970) ‘Bare Particulars’ M. J. Loux (Eds) Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame 281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Armstrong (1989) Universals: An Opinionated Introduction Westview Press Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bergmann (1967) Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong The University of Wisconsin Press Madison, Milwaukee, London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Boler (1963) Charles Pierce and Scholastic Realism University of Washington Press Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J.: 2001, ‘Medieval Theories of Relations,’ in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2001 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2001/entries/relations-medieval/>.

  • D. Brownstein (1973) Aspects of the Problem of Universals University of Kansas Press Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Campbell (1997) ‘The Metaphysic of Abstract Particulars’ Mellor Oliver (Eds) Properties Oxford University Press Oxford 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume V, ‘Bl. John Duns Scotus’, Copyright © 1909 by Robert Appleton Company, Online Edition Copyright © 2003 by K. Knight, URL= <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05194a.htm>.

  • G. Fine (1995) On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gilson (1949) Being and Some Philosophers Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl (1970) Logical Investigations Humanity Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Lewis (1984) ArticleTitle‘What is Aristotle’s Theory of Essence?’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 IssueIDsuppl 89–131

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Lewis (1992) Substance and Predication in Aristotle Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Maurer (1962) Medieval Philosophy Random House New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore G. E.: 1900–1901, ‘Identity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103–127.

  • Moore, G. E.: 1923, ‘Are the Characteristics of Particular Things Universal or Particular?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 3 (reprinted in Moore’s Philosophical Papers, New York: Collier Books 1962, pp. 17–32).

  • G. E. Moore (1953) Some Main Problems of Philosophy George Allen & Unwin London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland (1989a) ArticleTitle‘Keith Campbell and the Trope View of Predication’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 IssueID4 379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland (1989) ArticleTitle‘Was Husserl a Nominalist?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 IssueIDJune 661–674

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland (1996) ArticleTitle‘Issues and Options in Exemplification’ American Philosophical Quarterly 33 IssueID2 133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland (1998) ArticleTitle‘Theories of Individuation: A Reconsideration of Bare Particulars’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 251–263 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0114.00061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland (2001) Universals McGill-Queen’s University Press Montreal and Kingston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Moreland S. B. Rae (2000) Body and Soul: Human Nature and the Crisis in Ethics InterVarsity Press Downers Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J.: 1956, Reportatio: The Essential and Accidental Character of Being, and the Historical Controversy Surrounding the Problem of the Real Distinction, unpublished manuscript, J. R. Catan (ed.), URL = <http://pvspade.com/Logic/index.html>.

  • J. Owens (1992) Cognition: An Epistemological Enquiry Center for Thomistic Studies Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • C. D. C. Reeve (2000) Substantial Knowledge: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Hackett Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Scaltsas (1994) Substances and Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Cornell University Press Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Seargent, D: 1985, Plurality and Continuity: An Essay in G. F. Stout’s Theory of Universals, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancater: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

  • B. Smith (1994) Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano Open Court Chicago and La Salle

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, P. V: 1995, History of the Problem of Universals in the Middle Ages: Notes and Text, unpublished course packet, URL = <http://pvspade.com/Logic/docs/univers.pdf>.

  • Stout, G. F. 1923, ‘Are the Characteristics of Particular Things Universal or Particular?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. Vol. 3.

  • Stout, G. F.: 1936, ‘Universals Again.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 15.

  • Suarez, F.: 1947, On the Various Kinds of Distinctions(Disputationes Metaphysicae, Disputatio VII, de variis distinctionum generibus), Trans. Cyril Vollert, S. J., Milwaukee: S.T.D, Marquet University Press.

  • M.M. Tweedale (1999) Scotus vs Ockham: A Medieval Dispute over Universals The Edwin Mellon Press Lewiston, Queenston, Lampeter

    Google Scholar 

  • M. V. Wedin (2000) Aristotle’s Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, D.: 1964, Meaning and Universals in Husserl’s Logische Untersuchungen. Madison: University of Wisconsin doctoral dissertation, available through University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • D. Willard (1984) Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge Ohio University Press Athens, OH

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Aaron Preston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preston, A. Quality Instances and the Structure of the Concrete Particular. Axiomathes 15, 267–292 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-6680-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-6680-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation