Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Objectification and Condom Use Self-Efficacy in Women University Students

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the roles of indicators of the self-objectification process in women’s condom use self-efficacy. Data were collected from 595 college women. Self-objectification variables were assessed with measures of internalization of cultural standards of beauty, body surveillance, and body shame. Participants also completed measures of perceived control over sexual activity, acceptance of sexuality, and condom use self-efficacy. Measurement and structural invariance were supported, indicating that the measurement model and hypothesized structural model did not differ across participants who were or were not sexually active. Structural equation modeling results were consistent with hypotheses and prior evidence indicating that body surveillance partially mediated the link between internalization of cultural standards of beauty and body shame. Results also indicated that body shame was associated with lower condom use self-efficacy both directly and indirectly through the partial mediation of perceived control over sexual activity; acceptance of sexuality was not a significant mediator of this link but was associated directly with greater condom use self-efficacy. These results connect the substantial literature on the self-objectification process with women’s condom use self-efficacy. Specifically, these results point to interrupting the self-objectification process and reducing body shame as well as to enhancing acceptance of sexuality and control over sexual activity as potentially fruitful targets for interventions to promote women’s condom use self-efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142–161. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amaro, H., Raj, A., & Reed, E. (2001). Women’s sexual health: The need for feminist analysis in public health in the decade of behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 324–334. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2010). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auslander, B. A., Baker, J., & Short, M. B. (2012). The connection between young women’s body esteem and sexual assertiveness. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 25, 127–130. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2011.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brafford, L. J., & Beck, K. H. (1991). Development and validation of a condom use self-efficacy scale for college students. College Health, 39, 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, T. M., Thombs, D. L., Mahoney, C. A., & Wallnau, L. (1994). Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users. Journal of American College Health, 42, 167–174. doi:10.1080/07448481.1994.9939665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. L., Webb-Bradley, T., Cobb, P. D., Spaw, D., & Aldridge, K. N. (2014). African American women’s safer sexual practices: The influence of ethnic-racial socialisation and body esteem. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16, 518–532. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.891048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, Kelly D., & Napolitano, Melissa A. (1995). Distorting reality for children: Body size proportions of Barbie and Ken dolls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18, 295–298. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(199511)18:3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1997). Young women’s condom use: The influence of acceptance of sexuality, control over the sexual encounter, and perceived susceptibility to common STDs. Health Psychology, 16, 468–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6, 145–148. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2010. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, S., & Bridges, S. K. (2010). The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objecification theory. Body Image, 7, 32–38. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, A. C., Gurgel, A. P., Chagas, B. S., Coimbra, E. C., & do Amaral, C. M. (2012). Susceptibility to cervical cancer: An overview. Gynecological Oncology, 126, 304–311. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.047.

  • Fairchild, K. (2012). Review of self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 117–118. doi:10.1177/0361684311426127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. E., Weiss, H. A., Glynn, J. R., Cross, P. L., Whitworth, J. A., & Hayes, R. J. (2006). Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS, 20, 73–83. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000198081.09337.a7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, M. M., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Shearer, C. L. (2006). Does body image play a role in risky sexual behavior and attitudes? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 243–255. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-9005-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Gerend, M. A., Bird, S. T., Posner, S., Huszti, H. C., et al. (2006). A conceptual model of women’s condom use intentions: Integrating intrapersonal and relationship factors. AIDS Care, 18, 698–709. doi:10.1080/13548500500294435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg, L. J., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(199501)17:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2011). Identification: Overview. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/identify.htm. Accessed 25 June 2014.

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., & Shahar, G. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, H., Breitkopf, C. R., & Berenson, A. (2005). Body image and risky sexual behaviors: An investigation in a tri-ethnic sampl. Body Image, 2, 193–198. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269–298. doi:10.1177/0011000004272260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 634–647. doi:10.1177/0146167206297403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, F. J., Newton, J. D., Windisch, L., & Ewing, M. T. (2013). Gender differences in beliefs about condom use among young, heterosexual Australian adults. Health Education Journal, 72, 443–449. doi:10.1177/0017896912450240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W., Wambach, K. G., Harrison, D. F., Byers, J., Levine, P., Imershein, A., et al. (1993). The multiple jeopardy of race, class, and gender for AIDS risk among women. Gender & Society, 7, 99–120. doi:10.1177/089124393007001006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. doi:10.1177/0011000012445176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011a). An abbreviated tool for assessing conformity to masculine norms: Psychometric properties of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12, 339–353. doi:10.1037/a0021904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011b). His biceps become him: A test of objectification theory’s application to drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256. doi:10.1037/a0021398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, S. J. (2012). Public health interventions for body dissatisfaction and eating disorders: Learning from Victoria. In G. McVey, M. P. Levine, N. Piran, & H. B. Ferguson (Eds.), Preventing eating-related and weight-related disorders: Collaborative research, advocacy, and policy change (pp. 71–84). Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulerwitz, J., & Dworkin, S. L. (2006). Give-and-take in safer sex negotiations: The fluidity of gender-based power relations. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 3, 40–51. doi:10.1525/srsp.2006.3.3.40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satinsky, S., Reece, M., Sanders, S., Dennis, B., & Bardzell, S. (2012). An assessment of body appreciation and its relationship to sexual function in women. Body Image, 9, 137–144. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, D., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. S. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 324–334. doi:10.1080/00224490509552288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., & Williams, C. J. (2010). Bare bodies: nudity, gender, and the looking glass body. Sociological Forum, 25, 47–67. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01156.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C., & Davis-Beaty, K. (2002). Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003255.

  • Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. doi:10.1177/0011000006286345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrom, L., Joesoef, R., Reynolds, G., Hagdu, A., & Thompson, S. E. (1992). Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility: A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopy. Sexually Transmitted Dieases, 9, 185–192. doi:10.1097/00007435-199207000-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woertman, L., & van den Brink, F. (2012). Body image and female sexual functioning and behavior: A review. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 184–211. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.658586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2013). Baseline report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance 2012. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (2013). Women and gender: Making a difference. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-2051, USA

    Mike C. Parent

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Bonnie Moradi

Authors
  1. Mike C. Parent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bonnie Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike C. Parent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parent, M.C., Moradi, B. Self-Objectification and Condom Use Self-Efficacy in Women University Students. Arch Sex Behav 44, 971–981 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0384-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0384-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation