Skip to main content
Log in

Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluidity in attractions and behaviors among same-sex attracted women has been well-documented, suggesting the appropriateness of dynamical systems modeling of these phenomena over time. As dynamical systems modeling offer an approach to explaining the patterns of complex phenomena, it may be apt for explaining variability in female same-sex sexuality. The present research is the first application of this analytical approach to such data. Dynamical systems modeling, and specifically generalized local linear approximation modeling, was used to fit daily diary data on same-sex attractions and behaviors over a 21 day period among a group of 33 sexual minority women characterized as lesbian, bisexual or “fluid” based on their identity histories. Daily measures of women’s reported same-sex attractions were fit using a linear oscillator model and its parameters estimated the cyclicity in these attractions. Results supported the existence of a “core sexual orientation” for women in this sample, regardless of how they identified and despite a high degree of variability in daily same-sex attractions. Thus, modeling individual differences in the variability of attractions and behaviors of sexual minority women may be critical to furthering our understanding of female same-sex sexuality and human sexual orientation more broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). New York: Springer Science Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality band Social Psychology, 78, 524–536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. doi:10.1037/2909.126.3.347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1990). Intimate relationships and the creation of sexuality. In D. P. McWhirter, S. A. Sanders, & J. M. Reinisch (Eds.), Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation (pp. 307–320). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boker, S. M., Deboeck, P. R., Edler, C., & Keel, P. K. (2010). Generalized local linear approximation of derivatives from times series. In S. M. Chow & E. Ferrar (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 161–178). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 127–160. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumiere, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (1998). Development of sexual orientation among adolescent and young adult women. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1085–1095. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2000). Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a two-year period. Developmental Psychology, 36, 241–250. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003a). Was it a phase? Young women’s relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 352–364. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003b). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2005). A new view of lesbian subtypes: Stable vs. fluid identity trajectories over an 8-year period. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 119–128. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00174.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008a). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10 year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008b). Dynamical systems approach to the development and expression of female same-sex sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 142–161. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00034.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008c). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2012). The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: Contributions of dynamical systems theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 73–83. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9909-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2000). Explaining diversity in the development of same-sex sexuality among young women. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 297–313. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H. (1990). Gender preference in erotic relations: The Kinsey Scale and sexual scripts. In D. P. McWhirter, S. A. Sanders, & J. M. Reinisch (Eds.), Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation (pp. 177–207). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnets, L. D., & Kimmel, D. C. (2003). Lesbian, gay male, and bisexual dimensions in the psychology study of human diversity. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences (pp. 1–21). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. (1996). What’s in a name: Sexual self-identification among women. In R. C. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), The lives of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: Children to adults (pp. 229–249). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The genetics of sexual orientation. In J. S. Hyde (Ed.), Biological substrates of human sexuality (pp. 9–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S., & Tuler, B. (1984). A dynamical basis for action systems. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of neuroscience (pp. 321–356). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustanski, B. S., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2002). A critical review of recent biological research on human sexual orientation. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 89–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (2001). Rethinking women’s sexual orientation: An interdisciplinary, relationship-focused approach. Personal Relationships, 8, 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00025.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Garnets, L. M. (2000). A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rellini, A. H., McCall, K. M., Randall, P. K., & Meston, C. M. (2005). The relationship between self-reported and physiological measures of female sexual arousal. Psychophysiology, 42, 116–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. T., & Consolacion, T. B. (2003). Adolescent romance and emotional health in the US: Beyond binaries. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 499–508. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). Sexual identity trajectories among sexual minority youth: Gender comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 607–627. doi:10.1023/A:1002058505138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sex. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 189–231). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190. doi:10.1080/00926239608414655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L., & Diamond, L. M. (2001). Desegregating sexuality research: Combining cultural and biological perspectives on gender and desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, 33–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Oertzen, T., & Boker, S. M. (2010). Time delay embedding increases estimation precision of models of intraindividual variability. Psychometrika, 75, 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: Understanding bisexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the participants who generously shared their experiences as part of the longitudinal research project represented here. This work was supported, in part, by Grant 1 R21 HD044398 from the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, awarded to Sheri A. Berenbaum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel H. Farr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farr, R.H., Diamond, L.M. & Boker, S.M. Female Same-Sex Sexuality from a Dynamical Systems Perspective: Sexual Desire, Motivation, and Behavior. Arch Sex Behav 43, 1477–1490 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z

Keywords

Navigation