Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sociosexual Orientation and 2D:4D Ratios in Women: Relationship to Men’s Desirability Ratings as a Long-Term Pair Bond

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study examined whether men’s ratings of women’s desirability as a long-term pairbond, based on static photographs, were related to the women’s second-to-fourth digit (2D:4D) ratio and their sexual attitudes and behavior. The 2D:4D ratio was measured in 164 women and facial photographs were taken of 55 of these women. All women completed the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI). Male participants (n = 89), masked to this information, rated the 55 female participants on their desirability as a long-term sexual partner, specifically along dimensions of faithfulness, youthfulness, and attractiveness. Ten independent judges rated women’s photographed faces on masculinity. Results indicated a significant negative relationship between women’s SOI scores and men’s faithfulness ratings (more unrestricted sociosexuality was associated with lower faithfulness ratings). There was also a significant positive relationship between right (but not left) 2D:4D ratio and faithfulness ratings (women with female-like ratios were rated as being more faithful). The SOI scores of the women were not related to 2D:4D ratios. These results suggest that the potential for sexual infidelity can be gleaned from static facial cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabanschikov, V. (2010). What does the transmitted image of a human face tell an observer about personality traits? Social Science Information, 49, 291–327. doi:10.1177/0539018410371416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, A. A., Rudling, N., Kissling, C., Taurines, R., & Thome, J. (2011). Digit ratio (2D:4D), salivary testosterone, and handedness. Laterality, 16, 136–155. doi:10.1080/13576500903410369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Cross, C. P., Gray, A. W., Coombes, C., & Gregson-Curtis, K. (2011). Perceiving the facial correlates of sociosexuality: Further evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 422–425. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 211–218. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 523–534. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of American mate preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 491–503. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., Cronk, L., Simpson, J. A., Milroy, A., Wilson, C. L., & Dunham, B. (2009). The association between men’s ratings of women as desirable long-term mates and individual differences in women’s sexual attitudes and behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 509–513. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerda-Flores, R. M., Barton, S. A., Marty-Gonzalez, L. F., Rivas, F., & Chakraborty, R. (1999). Estimation of non-paternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: A validation study with blood group markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 281–293. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199907)109:3<281:AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. E., & Alexander, G. M. (2011). The association between 2D:4D ratios and sociosexuality: A failure to replicate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 587–595. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9715-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. P. (2004). Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women’s sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 113–124. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00085-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi experiments on the sociobiology of female beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925–993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1980). The face of man. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdenzi, C., Lemaître, J. F., Leongómez, J. D., & Roberts, S. C. (2011). Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts facial, but not voice or body odour, attractiveness in men. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 278, 3551–3557. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Schaefer, K., Bookstein, F. L., et al. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences, 272, 1995–2001. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., & Matts, P. J. (2008). The effects of skin color distribution and topography cues on the perception of female facial age and health. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 22, 493–498. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02512.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., DiGeronimo, K., & Biek, M. (1992). Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: Examination of a functional hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 688–698. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 34–47. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hönekopp, J., & Watson, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. American Journal of Human Biology, 22, 619–630. doi:10.1002/ajhb.21054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, N., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2004). How well does second-to-fourth-digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in males? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl. 5), S296–S298. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0163.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M. (1993). Inferring sexual interest from behavioral cues: Effects of gender and sexually relevant attitudes. Sex Roles, 29, 13–36. doi:10.1007/BF00289994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La France, B. H., Henningsen, D. D., Oates, A., & Shaw, C. M. (2009). Social–sexual interactions? Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76, 263–285. doi:10.1080/03637750903074701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9171-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. T., Trivers, R. L., Thornhill, R., & Singh, D. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children. Laterality, 5, 121132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matchock, R. L. (2008). Low digit ratio (2D:4D) is associated with delayed menarche. American Journal of Human Biology, 20, 487–489. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, M. H., Chapman, J. F., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2007). Index-to-ring finger length ratio (2D:4D) predicts levels of salivary estradiol, but not progesterone, over the menstrual cycle. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 434–436. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, K., Windhager, S., Wallner, B., & Schaefer, K. (2012). Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: The lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 279, 2457–2463. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2351.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–150. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00045-2.

  • Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1255–1266. doi:10.1177/0146167204264754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound, N., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., Sporter, R. J., & McBurney, D. H. (2004). Sex hormones and finger length: What does 2D:4D indicate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 182–199. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, K. A., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). Familiarity and person construal: Individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 852–861. doi:10.1002/ejsp.596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saal, F. E., Johnson, C. B., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 263–276. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, G., Muller, H., Chakraborty, R., & Ott, J. (1994). Estimating the frequency of non-paternity in Switzerland. Human Heredity, 44, 337–343. doi:10.1159/000154241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, P. S., & Johnston, V. S. (2005). Individual differences in women’s facial preferences as a function of digit ratio and mental rotation ability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 509–526. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051.

  • Schuetzwohl, A., DeLecce, T. L., Asamoah-Russell, B., Johnson, J. S., Sidhu, R., & Jethwa, N. (2010). Detecting infidelity. Unpublished manuscript, Brunel University, West London, UK.

  • Schwarz, S., Mustafić, M., Hassebrauck, M., & Jörg, J. (2011). Short- and long-term relationship orientation and 2D:4D finger-length ratio. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 565–574. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9698-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. L., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., … Hillier, S. G. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 135–140. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3296.

  • Stoyanov, Z., Marinov, M., & Pashalieva, I. (2009). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) in left- and right handed males. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119, 1006–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. P. (1983). Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00224498309551166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 1871–1971). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voracek, M. (2005). Shortcomings of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory: Can psychometric properties inform evolutionary psychology? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 296–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voracek, M., Manning, J. T., & Dressler, S. G. (2007). Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 142–146. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 147–154. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1129–1135. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9850-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all of the male and female participants who graciously volunteered their time and YTI Career Institute, Altoona Campus, for use of some of their students as research participants. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments about the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward Ave., Office 7405, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Tara L. DeLecce

  2. Psychology Department, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus, Altoona, PA, USA

    John P. Polheber & Robert L. Matchock

Authors
  1. Tara L. DeLecce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John P. Polheber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert L. Matchock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara L. DeLecce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeLecce, T.L., Polheber, J.P. & Matchock, R.L. Sociosexual Orientation and 2D:4D Ratios in Women: Relationship to Men’s Desirability Ratings as a Long-Term Pair Bond. Arch Sex Behav 43, 319–327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0201-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0201-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation