A Critique of the Proposed DSM-V Diagnosis of Pedophilia
- William O’Donohue
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Given their foundational role, examining the adequacy of diagnostic criteria and attempting to improve these is one of the most important activities our profession undertakes. However, devising and implementing satisfactory diagnostic criteria is a very difficult task for several reasons: (1) there is no consensual methodology that can be used to produce valid diagnostic criteria; (2) language is complex and attaching words to clinical phenomena gives rise to a whole host of thorny linguistic subproblems (e.g., the meaning of each word used); and (3) there is often missing information that would be useful in revisions identifying what the major problems are regarding the current diagnostic criteria (e.g., sources of current inter-rater reliability). However, despite these problems, the profession and other stakeholders are interested in the question of the extent to which the current criteria “carve nature at its joints” and can be successfully implemented by clinicians.
- Abel, G. G., Becker, J., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleou, J. L., & Murphy, W. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25. CrossRef
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Blanchard, R. (2009). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0.
- Levenson, J. S. (2004). Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 357–369. CrossRef
- Marques, J. K., Miederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s Sex Offender Treatment Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79–107. CrossRef
- O’Donohue, W., Regev, L., & Hagstrom, A. (2000). Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 95–105. CrossRef
- A Critique of the Proposed DSM-V Diagnosis of Pedophilia
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 3 , pp 587-590
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, 89557, USA