Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using biodiversity to valorise local food products: the case of fish ponds in a cultural landscape, their biodiversity, and carp production

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, we need to produce sufficient food and simultaneously conserve biodiversity. But, could biodiversity associated with certain food production practices also be used in marketing products? We analyse this possibility for creating a food quality label for carp raised in the Dombes territory, a cultural landscape of fish ponds in France. The biodiversity of 99 fish ponds was studied in the Dombes territory by analysing aquatic vegetation, dragonflies, amphibians, macroinvertebrates, habitats around ponds, and water quality. In addition, a survey with 200 questionnaires and interviews was conducted with consumers to investigate fish and carp consumption and knowledge about quality labels and biodiversity. Findings reveal that fish production practices conserve remarkable species diversity, particularly for aquatic vegetation, dragonflies and amphibians, and habitats around the ponds. This relatively high level of biodiversity is found in spite of having very nutrient-rich fish pond systems, systems for which normally a low level of biodiversity is expected. Nevertheless, currently this biodiversity cannot be valorised for setting up a quality label for locally produced carp. Firstly, few consumers have adequate knowledge about carp and are interested in eating it. Secondly, most of them have less knowledge about the quality label which wanted to be established for carp from the Dombes. Thirdly, only less than one-third of the consumer is familiar with the term “biodiversity”. Fourthly, the stakeholder network of the supply chain is presently not able to communicate the message of biodiversity as they themselves lack a sufficient knowledge about biodiversity of their systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthaud F, Mousset M, Vallod D, Robin J, Wezel A, Bornette G (2012) Effect of light stress from phytoplankton on the relationship between aquatic vegetation and the propagule bank in shallow lakes. Freshw Biol 57:666–675. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02730.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthaud F, Vallod D, Wezel A, Robin J, Bornette G (2013) Short–term succession of aquatic plant species richness along ecosystem productivity and dispersal gradients in shallow lakes. J Veg Sci 24(1):148–156. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01436.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham E (2003) Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. J Rural Stud 19:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérard L, Marchenay P (2007) Localized products in France: definition, protection and value-adding. Anthropol Food. http://aof.revues.org/index415.html. Retrieved February 2012

  • Bérard L, Marchenay P (2008) From localized products to geographical indications. Awareness and action. Bourg-en-Bresse, CNRS Ressources des terroirs, France, p 64

  • Bernard A, Lebreton P (2007) Les oiseaux de la Dombes: une mise à jour. Académie de la Dombes, Fondation Pierre Vérots. No 27 de la revue “Dombes”, France, p 168

  • Bissardon M, Guibal L (1997) CORINE Biotopes. Types d’habitats français. ENEGREF, Nancy, France, p 175

  • Boisvert V, Caron A (2010) La conservation de la biodiversité: un nouvel argument de différenciation des produits et de leur territoire d’origine. Geogr Econ Soc 12:307–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Hansson LA (2002) Environmental issues in lakes and ponds: current state and perspectives. Environ Conserv 29:290–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavrois A (2009) Biodiversité et signes de reconnaissance agricoles. UICN, Paris, France, p 159 http://www.uicn.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Biodiversite_signes_reconnaissance_agricoles.pdf. Retrieved March 2012

  • Davies B, Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Sear D, Bray S, Maund S (2008) Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125(1–4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI, Arnott SE, Cottingham KL (2000) The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81:2662–2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvarsen A, Okland RH (2006) Variation in plant species richness in and adjacent to 64 ponds in SE Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Aquat Bot 85:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) EU agricultural product quality policy. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/. Retrieved February 2012

  • European Commission (2012a) Organic farming—logo and labeling. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/consumer-confidence/logo-labelling_en. Retrieved May 2012

  • European Commission (2012b) NATURA 2000 network. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/index_en.htm. Retrieved May 2012

  • Gauttier M (2006) AOC et paysage. INAO, Ministère d’Agriculture et de la Pêche, Paris, France, p 75. http://agriculture.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/inaoetpaysage_0207.pdf. Retrieved March 2012

  • Gros M (2009) La difficile mise en valeur d’un produit de terroir: Exemple des poissons la Dombes. Master thesis, ISARA Lyon, France, p 55

  • Huet F (2009) Evaluation des conditions de rencontre offre/demande autour de la biodiversité. Exemple de la Carpe de la Dombes. Master thesis, ISARA Lyon, France, p 56

  • IFEN (2008) Espaces naturels. Les habitats naturels en France métropolitaine. http://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/lessentiel/ar/253/1115/habitats-naturels-france-metropolitaine.html. Retrieved June 2012

  • INAO (Institut National de l’Origine et de la Qualité) (2012) Les Signes de la Qualité et de l’Origine. http://www.inao.gouv.fr/public/home.php?pageFromIndex=produits/index.php~mnu=145. Retrieved May 2012

  • Indermuehle N, Angélibert S, Rosset V, Oertli B (2010) The pond biodiversity index “IBEM”: a new tool for the rapid assessment of biodiversity in ponds from Switzerland. Part 2. Method description and examples of application. Limnetica 29:105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc D, Angélibert S, Rosset V, Oertli B (2010) Les Libellules (Odonata) des étangs piscicoles de la Dombes. Martinia 26(3–4):98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Menetrey N, Sager L, Oertli B, Lachavanne JB (2005) Looking for metrics to assess the trophic state of ponds. Macroinvertebrates and amphibians. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resource Institute, Washington, DC, USA

  • Moonen AC, Bàrberi P (2008) Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B (1995) Odonates de la vallée de la Saône. Martinia 11(2):35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Auderset Joye D, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne J-B (2002) Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Auderset Joye D, Castella E, Juge R, Lehmann A, Lachavanne J-B (2005) PLOCH: a standardised method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH (2003) Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems—a global problem. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10:126–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Søndergard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Amsinck SL (2005) Water framework directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. Ecology 42:616–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thévenod-Mottet E (2010) Geographical indications and biodiversity. In: Lockie S, Carpenter D (eds) Agriculture, biodiversity and markets. Livelihoods and agroecology in comparative perspective. Earthscan, London, pp 201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Arthaud F, Dufloux C, Renoud F, Vallod D, Robin J, Sarrazin B (2013a) Varied impact of land use on water and sediment parameters on fish ponds of the Dombes agroecosystem, France. Hydrol Sci J 58(4):1–17. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.780656

  • Wezel A, Guerin M, Robin J, Arthaud F, Vallod D (2013b) Management effects on water quality, sediments and fish production in extensive fish ponds in the Dombes region, France. Limnologica 43(3):210–218. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2012.11.003

  • Xiao C, Dou W-F, Liu G-H (2010) Variation in vegetation and seed banks of freshwater lakes with contrasting intensity of aquaculture along the Yangtze River, China. Aquat Bot 92(3):195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We highly acknowledge the work of Florent Huet, Bruno Perico, Charlotte Ruger, and Fanny Lamiraux who carried out the questionnaire survey and the interviews with the consumers. We thank also Florent Arthaud and Veronique Rosset who provided the baseline data for some species groups. Many thanks also to Karly Burch for editing the paper. This study was supported by the French Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development through the DIVA2 program, the Water Agency (Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse) and the Rhône-Alpes Region. We sincerely thank the fish farmers who allowed us to work in their fish ponds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Wezel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wezel, A., Chazoule, C. & Vallod, D. Using biodiversity to valorise local food products: the case of fish ponds in a cultural landscape, their biodiversity, and carp production. Aquacult Int 21, 1395–1408 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9641-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9641-x

Keywords

Navigation