Skip to main content
Log in

Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation?

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming to recognize the distribution patterns of the mite fauna in soybean crops and to determine the existence of similarity in the composition of species between Cerrado fragments and these plantations, samplings were carried out in 10 areas located in Brazilian Mid-Western and Southeastern regions. Each area was comprised of one fragment of Cerrado sensu stricto and one adjacent soybean crop plantation, with simultaneous samplings carried out on both of them. From the total sampled species, 111 were recorded in the Cerrado and 25 in soybean crops. About 68 % were common in both environments and only eight were exclusively found in soybean. All the species of Phytoseiidae recorded in soybean were also found in the Cerrado. The tetranychid mite Mononychellus planki (McGregor) was the most abundant species (96.3 % of the total individuals) and the only one recorded in every sampled crop. The main occurrence of M. planki was verified in soybean crops using the transgenic cultivar ANTA 82. In general terms, it has been observed that Cerrado fragments do not shelter pest species that may attack soybean and can contribute to the increase of possible predator species in this agroecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adami M, Hastenreiter FA, Flumignan DL, de Faria RT (2008) Estimativa de área de folíolos de soja usando imagens digitais e dimensões foliares. Bragantia 67:1053–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amusa NA, Ojo JB (2002) The effect of controlling Mononychellus tanajoa (Acari: Tetranychidae) the cassava green spider mite using Typhlodromalus aripo (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the severity of cassava diseases in Transition forest, Nigeria. Crop Prot 21:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom C, Jepson W, Filippi AM, Redo D, Xu Z, Ganesh S (2008) Land change in the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado), 1986–2002: comparative analysis and implications for land-use policy. Land Use Policy 25:579–595. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conab (2013) Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: grãos, quarto levantamento, janeiro/2013. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft BA, Blackwood JS, McMurtry JA (2004) Classifying life-style types of phytoseiid mites: diagnostic traits. Exp Appl Acarol 33:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degrande PE, Reis PR, Carvalho GA, Belarmino LE (2002) Metodologia para avaliar o impacto de pesticidas sobre inimigos naturais. In: Parra JPR, Botelho PSM, Ferreira BSC, Bento JMS (eds) Controle biológico no Brasil: parasitóides e predadores. Manole, São Paulo, pp 71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Demite PR, Feres RJF (2008) Influência de Fragmentos de Cerrado na Distribuição de Ácaros em Seringal. Neotrop Entomol 37:196–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Smiley RL, Ochoa R (2003) Mites (acari) for pest control. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gnanvossou D, Hanna R, Dicke M, Yaninek SJ (2001) Attraction of the predatory mites Typhlodromalus manihoti and Typhlodromalus aripo to cassava plants infested by cassava green mite. Entomol Exp Appl 101:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes JVC, Návia D, Lofego AC, Dequech STB (2007) Ácaros associados à cultura da soja no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Neotrop Entomol 36:288–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman-Campo CB, Moscardi F, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Oliveira LJ, Sosa-Gómez DR, Panizzi AR, Corso IC, Gazonni DL, Oliveira EB (2000) Pragas da soja no Brasil e seu manejo integrado. Embrapa soja, Londrina

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified theory of biogeography and biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) A conservação do Cerrado Brasileiro. Megadiversidade 1:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler HH (1999) Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist EE (1986) The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): a morphological, phylogenetic and systematic revision, with reclassification of family group taxa in Heterostigmata. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofego AC, Moraes GJ (2006) Ácaros (Acari) associados a Mirtáceas (Myrtaceae) em áreas de Cerrado no Estado de São Paulo com Análise Faunística das famílias Phytoseiidae e Tarsonemidae. Neotrop Entomol 35:731–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry JA, de Moraes GJ, Sourassou NF (2013) Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst Appl Acarol 18:297–320. doi:10.11158/saa.18.4.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2011) Plano de Ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento e das queimadas: cerrado. MMA, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes GJ, Flechtmann CHW (2008) Manual de Acarologia: acarologia básica e ácaros de plantas cultivadas no Brasil. Holos Editora, Ribeirão Preto

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton DC, DeFries RS, Shimabukuro YE, Anderson LO, Arai E, Espirito-Santo FB, Freitas R, Morisette J (2006) Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci 39:14637–14641. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606377103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Návia D, Flechtmann CHW (2004) Rediscovery and redescription of Tetranychus gigas (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae). Zootaxa 547:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezende JM, Lofego AC, Návia D, Roggia S (2012) Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata, Sarcoptiformes and Trombidiformes) associated to soybean in Brazil, including new records from the Cerrado areas. Fla Entomol 95:683–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenhouse NL, Barrett GW, Zimmerman DM, Kemp JC (1992) Effects of uncultivated on arthropod abundances and crop yields in soybean agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 38:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggia S, Guedes JVC, Kuss RCR, Arnemann JA, Návia D (2008) Spider mites associated to soybean in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 43:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SoyStat (2013) World soybean production 2011. The American Soybean Association. http://www.soystats.com/2012/Default-frames.htm. (Accessed 12 June 2013)

  • Tixier M-S, Kreiter S, Auger P (2000) Colonization of vineyards by phytoseiid mites: their dispersal patterns in the plot and their fate. Exp Appl Acarol 24:191–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wissuwa J, Salamon J-A, Frank T (2012) Effects of habitat age and plant species on predatory mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in grassy arable fallows in Eastern Austria. Soil Biol Biochem 50:96–107. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ (2003) Mites of greenhouses: identification, biology and control. CABI International, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ (ed) (2011) Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148:1–237

Download references

Acknowledgments

To FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) (Procs. 06/57868-9, 08/07835-2 and 10/19935-1) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for providing the financial support for this study. To CNPq (National Council for Technological and Scientific Development) for authors’ research fellowships. To land owners for providing access to the forest fragments and crops in their properties. To Dr. Edson Hirose (Embrapa Soja), Dr. Márcio F. Peixoto (IFET—Rio Verde-GO) and Dr. Luis Adriano Maia Cordeiro (Embrapa Cerrados), for help on the selection of the studied areas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Rezende.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezende, J.M., Lofego, A.C., Nuvoloni, F.M. et al. Mites from Cerrado fragments and adjacent soybean crops: does the native vegetation help or harm the plantation?. Exp Appl Acarol 64, 501–518 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9844-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9844-5

Keywords

Navigation