Skip to main content
Log in

Asian family enterprises and family business research

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 December 2013

Abstract

This article discusses some of the notable trends in family business research. The critical role of context in building usable knowledge on family enterprises is highlighted. The Asia Pacific region offers a plethora of unique opportunities to build such knowledge as illustrated by some articles in this Special Issue. Families and their enterprises are integral to all Asia Pacific countries. However, the heterogeneity of institutional development and conditions in which these enterprises must operate offer unique research opportunities for scholars to build deeper understanding of family enterprises and contribute to the global knowledge in this important field of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. 2013. Financial performance of family firms. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, L., Hitt, M., Sirmon, D., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaba, S. 2013. Patient investment of family firms in the Japanese electric machinery industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9319-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, K., Chiang, F. T., Birtch, T. A., & Ding, Z. 2013. Incubating the next generation to venture: The case of a family business in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. 1991. A treatise on the family. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergfeld, M. M. H., & Weber, F. M. 2011. Dynasties of innovation: Highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(1): 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnberg, Å., & Nicholson, N. 2007. The family climate scales—Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20(3): 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunkanwanicha, P., Fan, J. P. H., & Wiwattanakantang, Y. 2008. Why do shareholders value marriage?. ECGI working paper in Finance no. 227/2008, European Corporate Governance Institute, Social Science Research Network.

  • Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. 1991. The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organization Behavior, 13: 55–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(5): 555–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Chang, E. P. C. 2004. Are family firms born or made? An exploratory investigation. Family Business Review, 17(1): 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. 1999. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4): 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, N., & Hatten, K. 1987. Non-market based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 11(3): 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colli, A. 2012. Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history. Family Business Review, 25(3): 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. J. B., & Salvato, C. 2012. The distinctiveness, design, and direction of family business research: Insights from management luminaries. Family Business Review, 25(1): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Sharma, P., Chua, J., & Chrisman, J. 2012. Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. 2013. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1): 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., Hofman, P. S., & Newman, A. 2013. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9301-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. 2007. Families, human capital, and small business: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(2): 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, K., Davis, J., Hampton, M., & Landsberg, I. 1997. Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, K. E., & Neus, F. 2013. Governing the family enterprise: Practices, performance, and research. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., Peng, M. W., & Shapiro, D. M. 2011. Corporate governance and Asian companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, S., Jussila, I., & Ikäheimonen, T. 2013. Governance in family firms: A review and research agenda. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family business Review, 12(1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatum, A. 2007. Adaptation or expiration in family firms: Organizational flexibility in emerging economies. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Hatum, A., & Pettigrew, A. M. 2006. Determinants of organizational flexibility: A study in an emerging economy. British Journal of Management, 17: 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. T., Rutherford, M. W., & Kuratko, D. F. 2010. Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC. Family Business Review, 23(1): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, F., & Sharma, P. 2010. Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • James, A. E., Jennings, J. E., & Breitkruz, R. 2012. Worlds apart? Re-bridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25(1): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2011. Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1): 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. 2005. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29: 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, J., & Lievens, J. 2008. Pruning the family tree: An unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony. Family Business Review, 21(4): 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. 2006. Dynasties: Fortunes and misfortunes of the world’s great family businesses. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansberg, I. 1999. Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A., Pearson, A., & Litchfield, S. 2012. Charting the future of family business research: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25(1): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. G., & Chrisman, J. J. 2013. Management succession in family business. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lybaert, N., Voordeckers, W., & Huybrechts, J. 2013. Entrepreneurial risk-taking of private family firms: The influence of a non-family CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review.

  • Markson, E. W. 2007. Social gerontology today: An introduction. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.

  • McKelvie, A., McKenny, A., Lumpkin, G. T., & Short, J. C. 2013. Corporate entrepreneurship in family business: Past contribution and future opportunities. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, A. F., Short, J. C., Zachary, M. A., & Payne, G. T. 2012. Assessing espoused goals in private family firms using content analysis. Family Business Review, 25(3): 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, V., Morck, R., Jungwook, S., & Wiwattanakantang, Y. 2011. Adoptive expectations: Rising sons in Japanese family firms. NBER working paper no. 16874, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

  • Melin, L., Nordqvist, M., & Sharma, P. 2013. SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2005. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3): 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional change and economic performance. New York: Norton.

  • Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. 2008. Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32: 949–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. W., Holt, D. T., & Carr, J. C. 2013. Scales in family business studies. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., & Whetten, D. A. 2011. What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?. Family Business Review, 24(2): 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, P., Howorth, C., & Cruz, A. D. 2013. Habitual and portfolio entrepreneurship and the family in business. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S., Bartunek, J., & Daft, R. L. 2001. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C., Chirico, F., & Sharma, P. 2010. A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurial and Regional Development, 22(3/4): 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C., Minichilli, A., & Piccarreta, R. 2012. Faster route to the CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency?. Family Business Review, 5(2): 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, A. 2011. The family in family business: Case of the in-laws in Philippine businesses. Family Business Review, 24(4): 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerwald, S., & Peng, M. W. 2013. Informal institutions, shareholder coalitions, and principal–principal conflicts. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9312-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, A. 2013. Transgenerational succession in business groups in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9342-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. 2008. Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4): 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. 2004. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future. Family Business Review, 17(1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. 2008. Commentary: Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(6): 971–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. 2010. Advancing the 3Rs of family business scholarship—Rigor, relevance, reach. In A. Stewart, G. T. Lumpkin & J. Katz (Eds.). Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, vol. 12: 383–400. Emerald Books.

  • Sharma, P., & Carney, M. 2012. Value creation and performance in private family firms: Measurement and methodological issues. Family Business Review, 25(3): 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Gersick, K. 2012. 25 years of Family Business Review: An outlook on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Hoy, F., Astrachan, J. H., & Koiranen, M. 2007. The practice driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research, 60(10): 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Rao, S. A. 2000. Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firms: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 13(4): 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Salvato, C. 2013. Family firm longevity: A balancing act between continuity and change. In P. Fernández Pérez & A. Colli (Eds.). A global revolution: The endurance of large family businesses in the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, H., & Wang, L. 2013. The impact of private and family firms’ relational strength on financing performance in clusters. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9316-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, L. B. 2007. New venture creation and organization: A familial sub-narrative. Journal of Business Research, 60(10): 1099–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. 2012. Why can’t a family business be more like a non-family business: Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1): 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, V. 2012. Advising the family firm: Reviewing the past to build the future. Family Business Review, 25(2): 156–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, E., & Carney, M. 2013. Can China’s family firms create intellectual capital?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9302-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, W., & Lee, C.-Y. 2013. Effects of corporate governance on risk taking in Taiwanese family firms during institutional reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9292-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F. 2007. “I shall not remain insignificant”: Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 754–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2): 385–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamgishi, T. 1988. The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3): 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahsltrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, A., Lumpkin, G. T., Sorenson, R. L., & Brigham, K. H. 2012. The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25(1): 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. L. 1987. Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Labaki, R., Gawad, S. G. A., & Sciascia, S. 2013. Family firms and social innovation: Cultivating organizational embeddedness. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist & P. Sharma (Eds.). SAGE handbook of family business. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. 2012. From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2): 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank APJM Special Issue Editors Kevin Au, Mike Peng, and Yuan Lu for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jess H. Chua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, P., Chua, J.H. Asian family enterprises and family business research. Asia Pac J Manag 30, 641–656 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9350-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9350-z

Keywords

Navigation